2
674
G. Nam et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2671–2674
7. Representative spectroscopic data of 8: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
) ppm 1
H
3
(
3c), quinoline (3d) and sulfur contained thienyl (3g) derivatives
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ppm 0.85 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 3H, 15-CH ), 0.98 (d,
3
)
2
were highly potent compounds within a series. But isoquinoline
derivative (3h) and pyrimidine substituent (3e) showed less po-
tency than the quinoline compound (3d) which having in different
placed nitrogen of ring. It seems to be important factor of the posi-
tion of nitrogen in the heteroaryl ring.
J = 6.90 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (d, J = 1.97 Hz, 3H), 1.22 (s, 3H, 12-Me), 1.25 (d,
J = 6.06 Hz, 3H), 1.30 (d, J = 2.89 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H,
6-Me), 1.46–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.65 (m, 1H), 1.69 (m, 1H), 1.97 (m, 1H), 2.26 (s, 6H,
NMe
2
), 2.46 (m, 1H), 2.56 (m, 1H), 2.74 (s, 3H, 6-OMe), 3.04 (m, 1H), 3.15–3.22
(
m, 2H), 3.32 (m, 1H), 3.45 (m, 1H), 3.57 (m, 1H), 3.68 (m, 1H), 3.85 (m, 1H),
3
.89 (m, 1H), 4.31 (dd, J = 6.36 Hz, 7.24 Hz, 2H), 4.46–4.49 (m, 3H), 5.18 (m,
13
The compounds having methoxy group in phenyl ring such as
1H), 5.22 (dd, J = 17.2 Hz, 16.8 Hz, 2H), 5.94 (m, 1H); C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl
3
)
ppm 11.0, 14.7, 14.8, 15.4, 16.6, 18.8, 19.93, 21.6, 21.9, 26.7, 31.0, 33.2, 38.0,
3
a (Ar = 3-OMePh), 3b (Ar = 3,4-(OMe)
and compounds having cyclic-ether type group, 3k (Ar = 3-CH{O(-
CH O}Ph) and 3l (Ar = 3-O(CH )-4-O–Ph) were showed lower
2
Ph) and 3f (Ar = 4-OMePh)
2
40.7 (NMe ), 46.3, 50.2, 51.3, 66.2, 69.8, 70.5, 70.7, 74.0, 75.0, 77.1, 78.1, 78.4,
1
03.6, 118.0, 134.6, 169.7 (C-9), 169.9 (C-1), 205.8 (C-3).
8. Representative spectroscopic data of 3; compound 3a: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
2
)
2
2
CDCl
.19 (s, 3H), 1.72–1.45 (m, 4H), 1.97 (m, 1H), 2.25 (m, 6H), 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.55
m, 1H), 2.76 (m, 3H), 3.26 (m, 5H), 3.54 (m, 2H), 3.78 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.82
3
) ppm 0.85 (t, J = 7.31 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J = 6.89 Hz, 3H), 1.15–1.01 (m, 9H),
activities against clinical strains of PRSPs. The potency of 3j con-
taining fused cyclopentanone also was low. Compound 3g
1
(
(
Ar = thienyl) and 3i (Ar = indol) exhibited good potency.
(m, 4H), 4.29 (m, 2H), 4.53 (m, 2H), 5.11 (m, 1H), 6.33 (m, 1H), 6.55 (d,
J = 19.05 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 7.57 Hz, 2H), 6.91 (s, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 7.66 Hz, 1H),
In summary, a new series of 9-O-arylpropenyloxime ketolide
7.23 (t, J = 7.91 Hz, 1H). (75 MHz, CDCl
3
) ppm 11.1, 14.8, 17.1, 18.9, 20.0, 21.6,
was designed, synthesized and evaluated for antibacterial activity
against clinically isolated gram-positive strains in Korea. Com-
pounds 3d (Ar = quinoyl) or 3g (Ar = thienyl) which having nitro-
gen or sulfur atom substituted heteroaryls were most potent
against S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes in clinical strains. These find-
ings present a good opportunity for the development of new mac-
rolide antibiotics to effectively combat the growing problems of
resistance strains in Korea.
2
1.9, 28.7, 33.3, 38.4, 40.6, 40.8, 47.1, 47.9, 50.3, 51.3, 55.6, 66.3, 69.9, 70.8,
74.1, 74.7, 78.2, 78.5, 79.8, 80.0, 83.8, 88.0, 103.9, 112.2, 113.9, 119.5, 126.1,
1
129.9, 130.7, 133.3, 138.5, 169.7, 170.2, 205.8. compound 3b:
H
NMR
) ppm 0.85 (t, J = 7.25 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J = 6.85 Hz, 3H), 1.05
m, 1H), 1.15 (d, J = 10.68 Hz, 3H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.30 (d, J = 7.65 Hz,
H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.68–1.46 (m, 4H), 1.97 (m, 2H), 2.26
(m, 6H), 2.48 (m, 1H), 2.60 (m, 1H), 2.74 (s, 3H), 3.19 (m, 4H), 3.57 (m, 1H), 3.65
(
(
300 MHz, CDCl
3
3
(
(
m, 1H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 4.31 (m, 2H), 4.33 (s, 1H), 4.61 (m, 2H), 5.11
m, 1H), 6.19 (m, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 15.81 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.40 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d,
13
3
J = 7.53 Hz, 1H), 6.93 (1H, s). C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl );ppm 11.1, 14.7, 15.0,
1
5
1
5.5, 16.6, 18.9, 20.1, 21.6, 21.9, 26.8, 28.7, 33.3, 38.4, 40.6, 47.1, 50.3, 51.3,
6.2, 56.3, 66.3, 69.8, 70.7, 70.7, 74.1, 74.9, 77.6, 78.2, 78.5, 103.9, 109.4, 111.5,
20.1, 123.8, 130.2, 133.4, 149.4, 169.7, 170.0, 205.9.
Acknowledgment
9
.
Clarithromycin was supported by Chong Kun Dang Corporation, CKD research
institute on purpose of research.
This work was financially supported by the MOST of Korea (2N
3250).
10. (a) Morimoto, S.; Adachi, T.; Asaka, T.; Kashimura, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Sota, K.
2
U.S. Patent 4,670,549, 1987.; (b) McGill, J. M.; Johnson, R. Magn. Reson. Chem.
1
993, 31, 273.
11. Nam, G.; Kang, T. W.; Shin, J. H.; Choi, K. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16,
69.
References and notes
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
Jacobs, M. R.; Bajaksouzian, S.; Windau, A.; Good, C. E.; Lin, G.; Pankuch, G. A.;
Appelbaum, P. C. Clin. Lab. Med. 2004, 24, 503.
Jacobs, M. R.; Femingham, D.; Appelbaum, P. C.; Gruneberg, R. N. J. Antimicrob.
Chemother. 2003, 52, 229.
Hsueh, P. R.; Teng, L. J.; Lee, C. M.; Huang, W. K.; Wu, T. L.; Wan, J. H.; Yang, D.;
Shyr, J. M.; Chuang, Y. C.; Yan, J. J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2152.
For recent reviews, see: (a) Asaka, T.; Manaka, A.; Sugiyama, H. Curr. Top. Med.
Chem. 2003, 3, 961; (b) Zhanel, G. G.; Walters, M.; Noreddin, A.; Vercaigne, L.
M.; Weirzbowski, A.; Embil, J. M.; Gin, A. S.; Dauthwaite, S.; Hoban, D. J. Drugs
12. Corey, E. J.; Kim, C. U. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1233.
13. (a) Agouridas, C.; Denus, A.; Auger, Y.; Benedetti, Y.; Bonnefoy, A.; Bretin, F.;
Chantot, J.-F.; Dussarat, A.; Fromentin, C.; D’Ambriéres, S. G.; Lachaud, S.;
Laurin, P.; Martret, O. L.; Loyau, V.; Tessot, N. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 4080; (b)
Tanikawa, T.; Asaka, T.; Kashimura, M.; Misawa, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Sato, M.; Kameo,
K.; Morimoto, S.; Nishida, A. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 4027.
14. (a). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 58, 141; (b) Kim, N. J.; Park, S. J.; Choi, S.-
H.; Lee, M. S.; Choo, E. J.; Kwak, Y. G.; Woo, J. H.; Ryu, J.; Jeong, J. Y.; Kim, Y. S.
Microb. Drug Resist. 2005, 11, 260.
2
002, 62, 1771.
15. All minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination was carried out
using clinically outcomes strains at Asan medical center in Seoul, Korea.
16. Leitner, F.; Misiek, M.; Pursiano, T. A.; Buck, R. E.; Chisholm, D. R.; Deregis, R. G.;
Tsai, Y. H.; Price, K. E. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1976, 10, 426.
5
.
.
(a) Xiong, Y. Q.; Le, T. P. Drugs Today 2001, 37, 617; (b) Nishaminy, N.; Acharya,
P. A. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2005, 62, 905.
(a) Hansen, L. H.; Mauvais, P.; Duthwaite, S. Mol. Microb. 1999, 31, 623; (b)
Capobianco, J. O.; Cao, Z.; Shortridge, V. D.; Ma, Z.; Flamm, R. K.; Zhong, P.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1562.
6