1088
V. Aragão-Leoneti, I. Carvalho / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 1087–1089
Figure 2. Important intermediates applied to the synthesis of 2,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (4).
trifluoromethanesulfonate for reductive cleavage gave 4 in 19%
yield,18 while regio- and stereoselective cyclization of manno open
olefin 8 (Fig. 2) allowed the preparation of deuterium labeling in
performed in 1,4-dioxane, THF, DMF, and H2O using the same reac-
tion conditions applied to MeOH (90 °C for 1 h under microwave
irradiation). Despite the moderate yield (41%) of 11 achieved in
the reaction using a mixture of MeOH/H2O (8:2), diepoxide 10
was not converted into the product 11 in the majority of the exper-
iments, being quantitatively recovered from the reaction mixture,
with exception of the use of DMF, which also led to the degradation
of 10. Additionally, the effect of the protective group on the cycli-
zation reaction was pursued using two derivatives of 10, contain-
ing either free hydroxyl groups at 3- and 4-positions, as
exemplified for compound 12, or 3,4-isopropylidene group in the
place of the original 3,4-dibenzyl protective group of 10, such as
compound 13. Thus, a time controlled hydrogenolysis of 10
(10 min) gave the diol 12 in 78% yield after purification by chroma-
tography column, which was treated with acetone and zinc chlo-
ride to give isopropylidene 13 (20% yield).26 While the
cyclization of diol 12 in the presence of ammonium formate re-
different positions of 4 from protected
with approximately 12% overall yield.19 Finally, oxidative cycliza-
tion of 1,5-diene 9 using OsO4, prepared from -mannitol (three
steps), gave the intermediate 2,5-anhydro-3,4-di-O-benzyl- -gluc-
-chitaric acid
D-mannose in four steps,
D
D
itol, which was converted into either compound 4 or
D
with approximately 42% and 13% overall yields, respectively.10
However, to the best of our knowledge the synthesis of com-
pound 4 from diepoxide derivatives with ammonium formate un-
der microwave conditions has not been described. In this Letter, an
alternative route to obtain 2,5-anhydro-
D-glucitol (4) is reported
from commercially available 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropylidene-
D-man-
nitol via intramolecular cyclization of diepoxide 10 using ammo-
nium formate in a microwave-assisted reaction (Scheme 1).
The protection of hydroxyl groups of 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropyli-
dene-
D
-mannitol was achieved by treatment with benzyl bromide
quired 2 h to give 2,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (4) in 22% yield, instead
and NaH in the presence of Bu4NI, after purification in silica gel
chromatography (96% yield).20 The cleavage of the isopropylidene
group was undertaken by treatment with MeOH/HCl, instead of
AcOH 70%,20 yielding the corresponding product with 98%
yield.21,22 The 1- and 6-positions were selectively protected with
TBDMS group followed by functionalization of secondary hydroxyl
groups (2- and 5-positions) using mesyl chloride. The crude prod-
uct was used in the next step without any purification.23 Treat-
ment of this compound with MeOH/HCl, followed by KOH gave
diepoxide 10 by intramolecular SN2 reaction (52% yield), involving
inversion of configuration at C-2 and C-5 (Scheme 1).23 Compound
10, which is an important intermediate in the synthesis of glycosi-
dase azasugar inhibitors (1-deoxynojirimycin and polyhydroxylat-
ed pyrrolidines),23 was converted into the furanose derivative 11
by treatment with ammonium formate in MeOH at 90 °C for 1 h
under microwave irradiation with 65% yield after purification in
silica gel chromatography (Scheme 1).24 The first step of this reac-
tion involves the regioselective opening of 1,2-epoxide of 10 fol-
lowed by the O-cyclization leading to glucitol 11. Alternatively,
ammonium formate has been described to reduce alkyl linear
1,2-epoxides to produce saturated alcohols in the presence of a
palladium catalyst.25
1 h for the corresponding 3,4-dibenzyl 10 to produce 11 (65%), at-
tempts to convert compound 13 into glucitol derivative under sim-
ilar reaction conditions provided just a complex mixture.
Finally, the hydrogenation reaction of glucitol 11 in the pres-
ence of Pd/C afforded 2,5-anhydro-
D-glucitol (4) in quantitative
yield (Scheme 1).27
In conclusion, 2,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (4) was successfully pre-
pared via intramolecular cyclization reaction of dibenzyl diepox-
ide 10, in the presence of ammonium formate, with overall
yield of 32% in seven steps from 1,2:5,6-di-O-isopropyllidene-D-
mannitol.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge financial support from Fundação de Amparo à
Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Coorde-
nação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
References and notes
1. (a) Gutowski, G. E.; Chaney, M. O.; Jones, N. D.; Hamill, R. L.; Davis, F. A.; Miller,
R. D. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1973, 51, 312; (b) Bottcher, T.; Sieber, S. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6964.
2. Soares, M. C.; de Souza, M. C. B. V.; Ferreira, V. F. Quim. Nova 2001, 24, 206.
3. Wu, W.; Vesonder, R. F. Nat. Toxins 1997, 5, 80.
In order to check the influence of the solvents on solubility, sta-
bility of the reactants, and cyclization rates, the reaction was also
4. Otero, D. A.; Simpson, R. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 128, 79.
5. (a) Tordoff, M. G.; Rawson, N.; Friedman, M. I. Am. J. Physiol. 1991, 261, R283;
(b) Horn, C. C.; Ji, H.; Friedman, M. I. Physiol. Behav. 2004, 81, 157.
6. Sun, H.; Niu, B.; Liu, J.; Wu, X. CN 101401803 (A), 2009.
7. Tanaka, T.; Hatano, K.; Watanabe, M.; Abbas, H. K. J. Nat. Toxins 1996, 5, 317.
8. Doboszewski, B.; Siqueira, E. C. Synth. Commun. 2010, 40, 744.
9. Mubarak, A. M.; Brown, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 2453.
10. Donohoe, T. J.; Butterworth, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 948.
11. Koerner, T. A. W., Jr.; Voll, R. J.; Younathan, E. S. Carbohydr. Res. 1977, 59, 403.
12. Barker, R. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 461.
13. (a) Hartmann, L. A. U.S. Patent 3,480,651, 1969.; (b) Hartmann, L. A. U.S. Patent
3,484,459, 1969.
14. Kuszmann, J. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 71, 123.
15. Kuszmann, J. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 73, 93.
16. Satoh, T.; Imai, T.; Umeda, S.; Tsuda, K.; Hashimoto, H.; Kakuchi, T. Carbohydr.
Res. 2005, 340, 2677.
O
OR2
O
HO
R1O
OH
ii
i
4
R1O
OR2
O
1
2
1
2
11
R = R = Bn
10
12
R = R = Bn
1
2
R = R = H
13 R1,R2= C(CH3)2
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2,5-anhydro-
HCO2NH4, MeOH, MW, 90 °C, 65%; (ii) H2, Pd/C, AcOH, MeOH, 100%.
D-glucitol (4). Reagents and conditions: (i)
17. Das, B.; Kumar, D. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6011.