Biometals
Conclusions
Bugg TDH (2003) Dioxygenase enzymes: catalytic mechanisms
and chemical models. Tetrahedron 59:7075–7101
Bugg TDH, Ramaswamy S (2008) Non-heme iron-dependent
dioxygenases: unravelling catalytic mechanisms for
complex enzymatic oxidations. Curr Opin Chem Biol
12:134–140
The comparative EPR investigation of a series of Ar-
1
,2-CTD mutants has allowed us to highlight the effect
of two mutations on oxygen binding properties of the
enzyme. Our data prove that a perturbation of the
environment of the catalytic pocket may result in an
increased ability of the enzyme to interact with
dioxygen.
Caglio R, Valetti F, Caposio P, Gribaudo G, Pessione E, Giunta
C (2009) Fine-tuning of catalytic properties of catechol
1,2-dioxygenase by active site tailoring. Chembiochem
10:1015–1024
Caposio P, Pessione E, Giuffrida G, Conti A, Landolfo S, Giunta
C, Gribaudo G (2002) Cloning and characterization of
two catechol 1,2-dioxygenase genes from Acinetobacter
radioresistens S13. Res Microbiol 153:69–74
Cappillino PJ, Miecznikowski JR, Tyler LA, Tarves PC,
McNally JS, Bala WL, Kasibhatla ST, Krzyaniak MD,
McCracken J, Wang F, Armstrong WH, Caradonna JP
A single mutant (A72N) denounces a structural
perturbation that affects directly the first coordination
sphere of the iron centre, whereas the A72D mutant
turn out to be unable to bind iron and provides no EPR
signal.
(
N
2012) Studies of iron(II) and iron(III) complexes with fac-
O, cis-N and N donor ligands: models for the
Finally, thermostability and pH studies shows that
the structural stability of mutants appears to be
influenced by the kind of residue introduced by
mutation, whereas the catalytic parameters seem more
influenced by the localization of the mutation site.
The experimental findings of this paper support
those published by Caglio et al. (2009) and Micalella
et al. (2011) and deepen our knowledge of the catechol
dioxygenase structure–function relationships. They
confirm the high degree of complexity of this enzyme,
where small structural changes may result in impres-
sive variations of the catalytic properties: this is
witnessed by the specificity inversion found by Caglio
et al. (2009) on the L69A mutant, which triggers the
conversion of a catechol-dioxygenase into a chloro-
catechol dioxygenase as for substrate selectivity.
Unraveling these aspects is of crucial importance
for an enzyme that raises a high biotechnological
interest due to its potential applications in the detec-
tion and removal of catechol derivatives from the
environment.
2
2
O
2
2 3
O
2-His 1-carboxylate motif of non-heme iron monooxyge-
nases. Dalton Trans 41:5662–5677
Citadini APS, Pinto APA, Ara u´ jo APU, Nascimento OR, Costa-
Filho AJ (2005) EPR studies of chlorocatechol 1,2-dioxy-
genase: evidences of iron reduction during catalysis and of the
binding of amphipathic molecules. Biophys J 88:3502–3508
Di Nardo G, Pessione E, Cavaletto M, Anfossi L, Vanni A,
Briganti F, Giunta C (2004) Effects of surface hydropho-
bicity on the catalytic iron ion retention in the active site of
two catechol 1,2-dioxygenase isoenzymes. Biometals
17:699–706
Earhart CA, Vetting MW, Gosu R, Michaud-Soret I, Que L,
Ohlendorf DH (2005) Structure of catechol 1,2-dioxygen-
ase from Pseudomonas arvilla. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 338:198–205
Ferraroni M, Solyanikova IP, Kolomytseva MP, Scozzafava A,
Golovleva L, Briganti F (2004) Crystal structure of
4
-chlorocatechol 1,2-dioxygenase from the chlorophenol-
utilizing gram-positive Rhodococcus opacus 1CP. J Biol
Chem 79:27646–27655
Ferraroni M, Kolomytseva MP, Solyanikova IP, Scozzafava A,
Golovleva LA, Briganti F (2006) Crystal structure of
3
-chlorocatechol 1,2-dioxygenase key enzyme of a new
modified ortho-pathway from the gram-positive Rhodo-
coccus opacus 1CP grown on 2-chlorophenol. J Mol Biol
3
60:788–799
Furukawa K (2000) Biochemical and genetic bases of microbial
degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). J Gen
Appl Microbiol 46:283–296
References
Horsman GP, Jirasek A, Vaillancourt FH, Barbosa CJ, Jarzecki
AA, Xu C, Mekmouche Y, Spiro TG, Lipscomb JD, Blades
MW, Turner RF, Eltis LD (2005) Spectroscopic studies of
the anaerobic enzyme–substrate complex of catechol 1,2-
dioxygenase. J Am Chem Soc 48:16882–16891
Boscolo B, Leal S, Salgueiro C, Ghibaudi EM, Gomes CM
(2009) The prominent conformational plasticity of lacto-
peroxidase: a chemical and pH stability analysis. Biochim
Biophys Acta 1794:1041–1048
Briganti F, Pessione E, Giunta C, Scozzafava A (1997) Purifi-
cation, biochemical properties and substrate specificity of a
catechol-1,2-dioxygenase from a phenol degrading Aci-
netobacter radioresistens. FEBS Lett 416:61–64
Matera I, Ferraroni M, Kolomytseva M, Golovleva L, Sco-
zzafava A, Briganti F (2010) Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase
from the gram-positive Rhodococcus opacus 1CP: quan-
titative structure/activity relationship and the crystal
structures of native enzyme and catechols adducts. J Struct
Biol 170:548–564
Briganti F, Pessione E, Giunta C, Mazzoli R, Scozzafava A
(
1
2000) Purification and catalytic properties of two catechol
,2-dioxygenase isozymes from benzoate-grown cells of
Acinetobacter radioresistens. J Protein Chem 19:709–716
Micalella C, Martignon S, Bruno S, Pioselli B, Caglio R, Valetti
F, Pessione E, Giunta C, Rizzi
M (2011) X-ray
123