heterocycles. To investigate regioselectivity in the deproto-
native metalation of nicotine, several metalating agents were
screened. The choice of base was found to play a crucial
role to access the desired lithiopyridine intermediates.
Recent efforts toward functionalization of pyridines have
focused on the development of directed ortho-metalation
methods (DoM effect).5 The mechanism of this selective
reaction was generally assumed to proceed via the well-
known complex-induced proximity effect (CIPE) between
the ortho-directing group and the lithiating agent promoting
introduction of lithium at the ortho position. In 2000, Fort
and co-workers reported a new base composed of n-BuLi
and Me2N(CH2)2OLi.6 This unimetal superbase called n-BuLi-
LiDMAE induced a regioselective lithiation of pyridine
derivatives even when an ortho-directing group was present
on the heterocyclic ring (Scheme 1). This selectivity strongly
pyridine ring (Scheme 1). The lack of lithiation at the C-2
position of the pyridine is probably due to steric hindrance
resulting from the pyrrolidine ring at C-3. Initially, (S)-6-
chloronicotine (4) was obtained in only 39% yield (Table
1). It is noteworthy to emphasize that this substitution of
Table 1. Formation of (S)-6-Chloronicotine
entrya
n-BuLi (equiv)
T (°C)
solvent system
4 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.4
5.4
0
0
-20
0
hexanes
hexanes/THF
hexanes
hexanes
hexanes/toluene
39-60
36
70
65
87
Scheme 1. Fort’s Unimetal Superbase Complexation by the
Pyridine Nitrogen Atom of 2 and Its Complexation with
(S)-Nicotine (1)
-20
a Reactions were run on a 1.0 mmol scale.
(S)-nicotine happens without racemization.7 The main side
reaction was the substitution by a butyl group onto the
pyridine ring at the C-6 position. Interested by the potential
synthetic utility of compound 4, solvent systems, number of
equivalents of base, and temperature were varied. The
reaction outcome was found to be highly sensitive to
solvents. When THF was used as a cosolvent (needed to
dissolve the electrophile) (entry 2), classical nucleophilic
substitution by n-BuLi was observed due to aggregate
disruption. Toluene (entry 5), a less polar solvent, did not
disrupt the aggregate, thus providing a better cosolvent for
this reaction. A lower temperature during the deprotonation
(entries 3 and 5) limited the addition of the butyl group to
the pyridine ring affording higher yields of 6-chloronicotine
(4). The synthesis of 4 was successfully performed on a large
scale (20 mmol) in excellent yield.
Next, the reaction of various representative electrophiles
was examined (Table 2). The addition of electrophiles to
the lithiated nicotine intermediate is very exothermic, which
facilitates the formation of the undesired regioisomer 9. The
low yields of bromination and iodination (entries 2, 3, and
5, respectively) were due to decomposition of the starting
material or butyl addition. The use of C2Br2Cl4 (entry 4)
afforded (S)-6-bromonicotine (8b) in good yield. Among
other examples, (S)-6-(dimethylphenylsilyl)nicotine (8d) and
(S)-6-(tributylstannyl)nicotine (8f) (entries 6 and 8) were
obtained in high yield since these groups cannot be displaced
by n-BuLi to form byproduct 6. The chlorination of
substituted analogues was performed as well and afforded
the C-6 regioisomer preferably (entries 10-12).
contrasted with results observed with the well-known lithium
diisopropylamine (LDA) and alkyllithium bases, which
abstracted exclusively the hydrogen at C-3 in agreement with
the DoM effect. The complete inhibition of the DoM effect
of the C-2 chlorine of 2 with n-BuLi-LiDMAE was
explained by the formation of aggregates between n-BuLi-
LiDMAE and the substrate via lithium complexation by the
pyridine nitrogen atom. The metalation had to be performed
in apolar, noncoordinating solvents such as hexane. Ag-
gregates were assumed first to deliver n-BuLi near the C-6
proton of 6-chloropyridine and second to ensure stabilization
of the formed C-6 lithiated intermediate.6
The reaction of nicotine with n-BuLi-LiDMAE resulted
in the selective deprotonation at the C-6 position of the
(4) (a) Anctil, E. J.-G.; Snieckus, V. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653,
150. (b) Queguiner, G.; Marsais, F. Snieckus, V.; Epsztajn, J. AdV.
Heterocycl. Chem., 1991, 52, 187. (c) Snieckus, V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90,
879.
(5) (a) Beak, P.; Meyers, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 356. (b) Snieckus,
V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 879. (c) Marsais, F.; Queguiner, G. Tetrahedron
1983, 39, 2009.
(7) Specific rotation for 4: [R]31D -156 (c 1.30, MeCN) [lit. [R]23D -154
(c 1.0, MeCN)]: Roduit, J.-P.; Wellig, A.; Kiener, A. Heterocycles 1997,
45, 1687.
(6) (a) Gros, P.; Fort, Y.; Caube`re, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1997, 20, 3071. (b) Gros, P.; Fort, Y.; Caube`re, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1997, 24, 3597. (c) Choppin, S.; Gros, P.; Fort, Y. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 803. (d) Gros, P.; Choppin, S.; Mathieu, J.; Fort, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 234.
(8) (a) Schmidt, B.; Neitemeier, V. Synthesis 1998, 1, 42. (b) Dukat,
M.; Dowd, M.; Damaj, M. I.; Martin, B.; El-Zahabi, M. A.; Glennon, R.
A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 31. (c) Dukat, M.; Fiedler, W.; Dumas,
D.; Damaj, I.; Martin, B.R.; Rosecrans, J. A.; James, J. R.; Glennon, R. A.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 31, 875.
5458
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 24, 2005