S.A. Fernandes et al. / Catalysis Communications 26 (2012) 127–131
131
2.1
a)
b)
0.6
0.4
1.8
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
y = 3.7398 + 0.5741 x
R2 = 0.994
y = -3.4848 - 1.0283 x
R2 = 0.998
0.0
-0.3
-8.1 -7.8 -7.5 -7.2 -6.9 -6.6 -6.3 -6.0 -5.7 -5.4
Ln[Catalyst]
-6.0 -5.7 -5.4 -5.1 -4.8 -4.5 -4.2 -3.9 -3.6 -3.3 -3.0
Ln[Catalyst]
Fig. 6. Linear plots of ln Keq versus 1/T for the palmitic acid esterification reaction with deuterated methanol: a) p-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene and b) sulfuric acid.
The initial concentration of palmitic acid was equal to 0.13 mol L−1
Table 2 shows the equilibrium constants calculated for each reaction at
the different temperatures studied.
Eq (3) is valid if the enthalpy change of the reaction is assumed to
be constant with temperature, and was obtained from the second law
of thermodynamic and definition of Gibbs free energy (ΔG=−RT
lnKeq):
.
in temperature than those performed in the presence of the p-sulfonic
acid calix[4]arene catalyst. Hence, the p-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene can
be recovered and reused without losing catalytic activity and can be po-
tentially employed as an efficient and environmentally benign catalyst
in biodiesel production from FFA esterification reactions.
Acknowledgments
ΔS ΔH
This work was financially supported by CAPES, FUNARBE, FAPEMIG
and CNPq. This work is part of a collaboration research project of mem-
bers of the Rede Mineira de Química (RQ-MG) supported by FAPEMIG
(Project: REDE-113/10).
lnKeq ¼
−
lim :
ð3Þ
x→∞
R
RT
From the data shown in Table 2, it was possible to build the linear
plots of ln Keq versus ln 1/T which is presented in Fig. 6, and by using
Eq. (3) the respective values of ΔS and ΔH were calculated and dis-
played in Table 2.
References
The slope of the curve provides the value of ΔH and the Y axis in-
tercept indicates ΔS. Thus, enthalpy and entropy variations were
found to be equal to 60.6 and 0.2 kJ mol−1 for p-sulfonic acid calix
[4]arene-catalyzed reactions, and 25.4 and 0.1 kJ mol−1 for sulfuric
acid-catalyzed reactions, respectively. Table 2 shows these values as
well as the Gibbs free energy obtained for each reaction at the specific
reaction temperatures. It is important to note that although entropy
variation may be affected by solvent presence, calculations were
made taken into account the CD3OD concentration but only negligible
differences were encountered. These kinetic and thermodynamic re-
sults suggest that the esterification reactions studied herein are not
controlled by the number of protons dissociable present in the cata-
lysts only. Actually the catalyst structure noticeably affected catalyst
performance when the reaction parameters of catalyst concentration
and reaction temperature are varied.
[1] R.C. Larock, Comprehensive Organic Transformations, VCH, New York, NY, 1989,
p. 966.
[2] J. Otera, Esterification: Methods, Reactions and Applications, Wiley, New York,
NY, 2003.
[3] A.C. Carmo, L.K.C. de Souza, C.E.F. de Costa, E. Longo, J.R. Zamian, G.N. Rocha Filha
da, Fuel 88 (2009) 461–468.
[4] H.R. Ansari, A.J. Curtis, Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 25 (1974)
203–231.
[5] T. Nishikubo, A. Kameyama, Y. Yamada, Y. Yoshida, Journal of Polymer Science
Part A: Polymer Chemistry 34 (1996) 3531–3537.
[6] Z. Helwani, M.R. Othman, N. Aziz, W.J.N. Fernando, J. Kim, Fuel Processing
Technology 90 (2009) 1502–1514.
[7] A. Demirbas, Energy Conversion and Management 50 (2009) 14–34.
[8] V. Brahmkhatri, A. Patel, Applied Catalysis A: General 403 (2011) 161–172.
[9] F.R. Ma, M.A. Hanna, Bioresource Technology 70 (1999) 1–15.
[10] J. Lilja, J. Aumo, T. Salmi, D. Murzin, P. Maki-Arvela, M. Sundell, K. Ekman, R.
Peltonen, H. Vainio, Applied Catalysis A: General 228 (2002) 253–267.
[11] E.O. Akbay, M.R. Altiokka, Applied Catalysis A: General 396 (2011) 14–19.
[12] S. Iwahana, H. Iida, E. Yashima, Chemistry — A European Journal 17 (2011)
8009–8013.
[13] M.T. Molina, C. Navarro, A.G. Csaky, Journal of Organic Chemistry 74 (2009)
9573–9575.
4. Conclusions
[14] E. Akceylan, M. Yilmaz, Tetrahedron 67 (2011) 6240–6245.
[15] S.A. Fernandes, R. Natalino, P.A.R. Gazolla, M.J. da Silva, G.N. Jham, Tetrahedron
Letters 53 (2012) 1630–1633.
[16] D.M. Homden, C. Redshaw, Chemical Reviews 108 (2008) 5086–5130.
[17] L.S. Santos, S.A. Fernandes, R.A. Pilli, A.J. Marsaioli, Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 13
(2003) 2515–2519.
[18] D.L. da Silva, S.A. Fernandes, A.A. Sabino, A. de Fátima, Tetrahedron Letters 52
(2011) 6328–6330.
[19] J.B. Simões, D.L. da Silva, de Fátima, S.A. Fernandes, Current Organic Chemistry 16
(2012) 949–971.
[20] C.D. Gutsche, M. Iqbal, Organic Syntheses 68 (1989) 234–238.
[21] A. Casnati, N.D. Ca, F. Sansone, F. Ugozzoli, R. Ungaro, Tetrahedron 60 (2004)
7869–7876.
[22] S. Shinkai, K. Araki, T. Tsubaki, T. Some, O. Manabe, Journal of the Chemical
Society, Perkin Transactions 1 1 (1987) 2297–2299.
Kinetic studies utilizing in situ 1H NMR spectroscopy showed that
the catalysts studied here (i.e. p-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene and sulfuric
acid) presented a different behavior in the palmitic acid esterification re-
action. These catalysts were differently affected when main reaction pa-
rameters such as temperature and catalyst concentration are varied. It
was found that the activation energy of the p-sulfonic acid calix[4]
arene-catalyzed esterification reaction is lower than that observed in re-
actions in the presence of sulfuric acid at catalyst concentrations equal to
0.5 mol%. On the other hand, the dependence of reaction rate on sulfuric
acid concentration is higher than on that of p-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene
(1.0 against 0.57 respectively), in the concentration range of 0.5 to
5.0 mol%. Conversely, ΔG values obtained suggested that this reaction
catalyzed by sulfuric acid becomes more spontaneous with increases
[23] S.A. Fernandes, A.L. Cardoso, M.J. da Silva, Fuel Processing Technology 96 (2011)
98–103.