biopolymer extract contains only low levels of crystalline
material. No additional information was obtained from diffrac-
tion studies at low values of 2q suggesting that the siliceous
materials are not mesoporous, lamellar phases.
The presence of the protein-containing extract in the
oligomerizing mixture clearly had some effect on nucleation
with the formation of (a) smaller particles of silica (the majority
of fundamental particles are smaller than 2 nm in diameter as
opposed to particles up to 4 nm in diameter for the blank
system) and, (b) silica with a crystalline appearance. The
presence of the latter material from the earliest analysis point (as
assessed by electron microscopy) suggests that this material is
formed very early in the reaction profile and is not the result of
structural rearrangement with time.
Biopolymers can be removed from the silica precipitated in
the ‘model’ reaction system utilizing the same methods used for
their initial production. The levels of proline are decreased and
the levels of glycine are ca. doubled in the proteinaceous
material extracted from the ‘model’ silica precipitated materi-
als. The amino acid composition of the biopolymer extracts is
rich in amino acids known to form b-sheet or b-turn secondary
structures. For such structures, the spacing between successive
layers is a minimum of 3.5 Å when only glycine is involved but
may be 5.7 Å for chains rich in alanine as is found in the silk
protein fibroin.15 It is possible that the observed silica structures
are either crystalline silica formed de novo from aqueous
solution, or more likely, the observed structures are generated
by epitaxial matching of the organic and inorganic matrices
with the silica structure continuing to develop from the initial
biopolymer-controlled nucleation event. It is evident that in the
biological environment additional controls must be exerted
during the process of silica precipitation in order to prevent the
formation of crystalline phases as they are much more difficult
to mould into the macroscopic structures produced by living
organisms.
absence of multicharged cations, conditions which would not be
expected to yield crystalline silica.11,16
Notes and references
† Precipitation experiments were conducted using biopolymer extracts from
two separate extractions. The amino acid compositions were measured
using an Applied Biosystems 420a amino acid analyser operated by A. C.
Willis of the MRC Immunochemistry Unit, Oxford University. For the
kinetic measurements, four sample runs were completed for each experi-
ment on the same day using a temperature controlled reaction vessel set at
23 ± 0.1 °C. Samples for electron microscopy studies were taken from
parallel experiments by dipping carbon coated formvar covered copper
electron microscope grids into the reaction vessel at 1, 4, 24, 48 h and 7 days
after the experiment was initiated and allowing the grids to air dry. Samples
for electron microscopy were investigated using a JEOL 2010 analytical
electron microscope (Link ISIS system) fitted with a LaB6 filament
operating at 200 keV. Magnifications of 200 000 3 were necessary to see
the lattice fringing present and areas of interest were subjected to energy
dispersive X-ray analysis to identify the elements with atomic number !6
present in the sample. A minimum of 10 analyses for each sample area
showed that the precipitated material contained Si and O together with
traces of K and Cl (N.B. the grids were not washed after sampling by
dipping). Crystalline structures as presented in this paper have not been
observed by transmission electron microscopy in any of our other model
precipitation experiments performed in the presence of a range of singly and
multiply charged metal ions, carbohydrates and proteins such as bovine
serum albumin, zein, concanavalin A and cytochrome c. Silica samples
were also analysed by powder X-ray diffraction; Siemens D500 dif-
fractometer operating in the range 2q = 1–80° by Professor Mark Weller
and Dr Adam Whitehead of Southampton University. The Visual Services
Department at The Nottingham Trent University are thanked for printing of
the electron micrographs for publication. BBSRC and Crosfield Chemicals
are thanked for their funding.
Amino acid composition of bioextract used in the precipitation
experiment (mol%); Asx; 8.9, Glx; 15.0, His; 3.5, Lys; 4.94, Arg, 1.54, Ser;
14.24, Thr; 3.91, Tyr; 1.30, Gly; 16.67, Pro; 9.60, Ala; 8.42, Val; 4.07, Leu;
4.3, Ile; 2.64, Phe; 0.98 Amino acid composition of biopolymers extracted
from ‘model’ system precipitated silica (mol%); Asx; 7.56, Glx; 12.3, His;
5.7, Lys; 2.73, Arg, 3.4, Ser; 12.92, Thr; 4.41, Tyr; 2.35, Gly; 30.46, Pro;
4.06, Ala; 6.95, Val; 2.94, Leu; 4.23, Ile; nd, Phe; nd. nd = not detected.
‡ Rate constants:13 blank system; k3 = 4.91 3 1026 mmol22 dm6 s21, k+
= 5.67 3 1024 s21, k2 = 1.19 3 1025 s21. With 1% biomolecule extracts;
k3 = 6.29 3 1026 mmol22 dm6 s21, k+ = 4.73 3 1024 s21, k2 = 7.97 3
Further work will involve identification of the biopolymer
component(s) (preliminary studies have shown that the extracts
contain both high molecular weight proteins and low molecular
weight glycoproteins) which are most effective in the sponta-
neous generation of crystalline silica structures from super-
saturated solutions at room temperature, neutral pH and in the
1026 s21
.
1 Biomineralization: Chemical and Biochemical Perspectives, ed. S.
Mann, J. Webb and R. J. P. Williams, VCH, Weinheim, 1989.
2 H. Lowenstam and S. Weiner, On Biomineralization, OUP, Oxford,
1989.
3 S. Weiner, J. Exptl. Zool., 1985, 234, 7.
4 A. Berman, J. Hanson, L. Leiserowitz, T. Koetzle, S. Weiner and L.
Addadi, Science, 1993, 259, 776.
5 C. C. Harrison (now Perry), Phytochemistry, 1996, 41, 37.
6 N. Kro¨ger, G. Lehmann, R. Rachel and M. Sumper, Eur. J. Biochem.,
1997, 250, 99.
7 K. Shimizu, J. Cha, G. D. Stucky and D. E. Morse, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., 1998, 95, 6234.
8 C. C. Perry, in Biomineralization: Chemical and Biochemical Per-
spectives, ed. S. Mann, J. Webb and R. J. P. Williams, VCH, Weinheim,
1989, p. 223.
9 C. W. Li and B. E. Volcani, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Sect. B, 1984,
304, 519.
10 C. C. Perry and Y. Lu, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1992, 88,
2915.
11 R. K. Iler, The Chemistry of Silica, Wiley-Interscience, 1979.
12 C. C. Harrison (now Perry) and N. Loton, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans., 1995, 91, 4287.
13 G. C. Miller and G. N. Miller, Significant Tests in Statistics for
Analytical Chemistry, Ellis Horwood, 3rd edn., 1993.
14 Y. Rosenfeld Hacohen, E. Grunbaum, R. Tenne, J. Sloan and J. L.
Hutchison, Nature, 1998, 395, 336.
15 R. E. Marsh, R. B. Corey and L. Pauling, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1955,
16, 1.
16 H. Harder and W. Flehmig, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1970, 34,
295.
Fig. 2 (a)–(c) Transmission electron microscopy data for unusual silica
structures precipitated in the presence of 1% w/w biopolymer extracts. All
images shown are from microscope grids prepared by the ‘dipping’ method.
Scale bars represent 10 nm; (d) electron diffraction pattern from (b). Pattern
was recorded using a camera length of 100 cm.
Communication 8/07404F
2588
Chem. Commun., 1998, 2587–2588