624 Devi et al.
Asian J. Chem.
product was collected by filtration and recrystallized from
ethanol to give the corresponding (Z)-3-methyl-5-(4-nitro-
benzylidene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (1a) in 90 % yield.
Spectral and analytical data of selected compounds are given
below.
of spectroscopic analysis (1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR, HRMS),
the structure of the isolated product was determined as (Z)-3-
methyl-5-(4-nitrobenzylidene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (1a)
(Scheme-I).
To optimize the reaction condition, the effect of catalyst
loading was screened. Increasing L-proline to 30 mol % led
to a higher yield of 90 % (Table-1, entry 2); further increasing
it to 35 mol % did not improve the yield. Different catalysts
such as L-histidine and L-leucine (Table-1, entries 3-4) were
tested for this transformation, from which L-proline (Table-1,
entry 2) was found to be the most effective catalyst. Next, various
solvents were screened for their influence on this reaction. In
water, the reaction proceeded efficiently and gave the desired
product (1a) in highest yield (90 %); while using ethanol, yield
was reduced to 85 % (Table-1, entry 5). Other solvents such as
CH3CN (70 %), dioxane (68 %) and THF (65 %) were less
effective compared to water (Table-1, entries 6-8).
(Z)-3-Methyl-5-(4-nitrobenzylidene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-
1
4-one (1a): Yellow solid; m.p. 210-211 °C; yield 90 %; H
NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.5 (s, 3H), 7.63 (d, J = 9.0 Hz,
2H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (150
MHz, CDCl3): δ = 35.9, 124.7, 127.8, 129.2, 131.1, 139.4,
148.2, 167.6, 191.9; IR (KBr, νmax, neat): 1715, 1574, 1377,
1191 cm-1; HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C17H8N2O3S2 [M+H]+:
280.9986; found: 280.9990.
(Z)-3-Benzylidene-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (2c): Yellow
solid; m.p. 155-156 °C (Lit. [11] m.p. 156 °C); yield 90 %; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.30 (s, 2H), 7.24-7.32 (m, 3H),
7.45-7.47 (m, 7H), 7.72 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 47.6, 123.0, 128.2, 128.6, 129.0, 129.4, 130.7, 130.9, 133.4,
133.5, 134.9, 167.9, 193.3; IR (KBr, νmax, neat): 1706, 1595,
1343, 1190 cm-1; HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C17H13NOS2 [M+H]+:
312.0511; found: 312.0514.
TABLE-1
OPTIMIZATION OF REACTION CONDITIONS
O2N
NO2
S
S
(Z)-5-(2,6-Dichlorobenzylidene)-3-benzyl-2-thioxo-
thiazolidin-4-one (2e): Yellow solid; m.p. 113-114 °C; yield
S
[catalyst]
[solvent]
S
+
N
N
CH3
1
CH3
96 %; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.28 (s, 2H), 7.25-
O
7.37 (m, 6H), 7.48 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (s, 1H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 47.8, 128.2, 128.3, 128.5, 128.6, 129.1,
131.0, 131.3, 131.6, 134.1, 134.4, 166.5, 193.3.
O
H
O
(1a)
(a)
(1)
Entry
Catalyst
Solvent
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
EtOH
CH3CN
1,4-Dioxane
THF
Yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
L-prolinec
L-proline
L-histidine
L-leucine
L-proline
L-proline
L-proline
L-proline
70
90
65
70
85
70
68
65
(Z)-3-(2-(1H-Indol-3-yl)ethyl)-5-((furan-2-yl)-methylene)-
2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (4f): Grey solid; m.p. 186-187 °C;
1
yield 75 %; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.13-3.17 (m,
2H), 4.36-4.00 (m, 2H), 6.55–6.59 (m, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 3.6
Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.12-7.20 (m, 2H), 7.33 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (s, 1H), 7.69 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.3 Hz,
1H), 8.02 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.9,
45.2, 53.5, 111.0, 111.9, 113.4, 118.1, 118.7, 119.0, 119.8,
122.1, 122.2, 127.4, 136.1, 146.9, 150.1, 167.5, 194.7.
(Z)-3-Benzyl-5-[(pyridine-2-yl)methylene]-2-thioxo-
thiazolidin-4-one (2g): Light green solid; m.p. 194-195 °C;
aReaction conditions: (1) (0.5 mmol), (a) (0.6 mmol), catalyst (30 mol
b
%) and solvent (3 mL) at room temperature for 6 h; Isolated yield.
cCatalyst (20 mol %).
Having established the appropriate reaction conditions,
we next explored the substrate scope of N-substituted 5-arylidene
rhodanines using various N-substituted rhodanines and aromatic
aldehydes (Scheme-II). The N-substituted rhodanines (1) con-
densed with aromatic aldehydes possessing electron withdrawing
group such as 4-NO2 (a) and 2-F (b) giving desired N-substituted
5-arylidene rhodanines (1a) and (1b) in 90 % and 87 % yields
respectively. Here, highly electron withdrawing group gave
higher yield of the product irrespective of their position. The
N-substituted rhodanines (2) and (3) were smoothly condensed
with benzaldehyde (c) to give their corresponding N-substituted
5-arylidene rhodanines (2c, 90 %) and (3c, 78 %), respectively.
The N-substituted rhodanine (2) reacted with aromatic aldehydes
having electron donating substituent 4-OCH3 (d) giving its
respective N-substituted 5-arylidene rhodanines (2d, 85 %),
but gave lesser yield as compared to (2e, 96 %) which were
obtained from aromatic aldehyde having electron withdrawing
substituent 2,6-dichloro (e). The condensation reaction is also
successfully applied to heterocyclic aldehyde (f) and (g). The
use of dialdehyde (h) gave molecule containing two differently
space rhodanine rings (2h) in good yield.
1
yield 83 %; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.31 (s, 2H),
7.25-7.34 (m, 4H), 7.44-7.53 (m, 3H), 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.73-7.78
(m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 47.1, 123.5, 127.4,
128.0, 128.1, 128.5, 128.6, 129.0, 135.1, 135.7, 149.6, 151.8,
168.0, 199.9.
(5Z)-5-(3-[(Z)-(3-Benzyl-4-oxo-2-thioxothiazolidin-5-
ylidene)methyl]benzylidene)-3-benzyl-2-thioxothiazolidin-
1
4-one (2h): Yellow solid; m.p. 174-175 °C; yield 60 %; H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 5.31 (s, 4H), 7.30-7.33 (m, 6H),
7.45-7.52 (m, 8H), 7.70 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 47.7, 125.0, 128.3, 128.7, 129.1, 130.4, 131.4, 131.8, 132.1,
134.6, 134.7, 167.7, 192.4.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
With the above expectation, a trial reaction was carried
out by treating N-substituted rhodanine (1) with 4-nitrobenzal-
dehyde (a) in the presence of L-proline (20 mol %) in water at
room temperature. After 6h stirring, a yellow precipitate was
observed, separated by filtration and the product was isolated
(70 % yield) by recrystallization from ethanol. On the basis