6108
A. J. Blacker et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 6106–6109
Table 2 (continued)
Entry
Amine
R1
Aminophenol
R2
H
R3
Product
Yield (%)
68
O
N
Me
9
7c
7b
7c
7a
4-MeC6H4
9b
Me
10h
Me
Cl
O
MeO
Me
10
11
12
4-MeOC6H4
4-MeC6H4
Ph
9c
9c
9d
H
Cl
Cl
H
10i
10j
10k
50
42
52
N
O
H
N
Cl
O
N
Me
Me
O
N
a
13
14
7f
ArCH2
9a
9a
H
H
H
H
10l
48
55
MeO
MeO
O
N
nC5H11
7g
C5H11
10m
a
Ar = 3,4-(MeO)2C6H3–.
imine. Styrene was found to be ineffective (entry 4), but 2,6-dim-
ethoxybenzoquinone (DMBQ)13b–d delivered moderate yields of
the desired benzoxazole in both mesitylene and toluene as sol-
vents (entries 5 and 6). We also considered the possibility that
the primary amine (benzylamine) might be more difficult to oxi-
dise than a more electron-rich secondary amine. The resulting N-
alkylbenzaldimine ought still to be able to participate in transimin-
ation and hence in benzoxazole formation. We therefore examined
the reactions using dibenzylamine as the substrate. In the absence
of a hydrogen accepting co-oxidant, no reaction was observed (en-
tries 7 and 9), but the addition of co-oxidants again proved effec-
tive, with DMBQ proving most efficient. The Shvo catalyst
appears more effective than [CpIrI2]2 in this transformation (en-
tries 8 and 12).
We next attempted to determine the role of the DMBQ. Use of a
single stoichiometric equivalent of DMBQ gave a much-reduced
yield of benzoxazole (entry 13), suggesting its involvement in both
oxidation steps. A control reaction in the absence of a catalyst
showed that DMBQ alone can mediate benzoxazole formation,
but this reaction returned only a low yield of product (entry 14),
demonstrating a significant role for the catalyst. Finally, we exam-
ined whether the formal dehydrogenation of the catalyst might be
mediated aerobically, to circumvent the need for the organic co-
oxidant. Again, this was successful but low yielding (entry 15).
Although we cannot comment further on the exact mode of action
of DMBQ, it is clear from these results that both catalyst and co-
oxidant are required for the most efficient transformation, and that
the latter has a role in both putative oxidation steps.
With an optimised protocol in hand, we next examined the
scope and limitations of the method with respect to both amine
and aminophenol reactants. The results are outlined in Table 2.
The reaction is effective for a range of primary benzylic and het-
erobenzylic amines. Higher yields are obtained for substrates bear-
ing electron-donating substituents (p-MeO–, p-Me) and lower
yields are obtained for the electron-poor p-chloro derivative (en-
tries 3 and 4 cf. entry 5). This is consistent with a mechanism
involving hydride abstraction with a resulting build-up of partial
positive charge at the benzylic carbon. Similarly, the presence of
an electronegative chlorine atom in the aminophenol gives lower
yields (entries 10 and 11) than the corresponding electronically
neutral (entries 3 and 4) or electron-rich (entries 8 and 9) variants.
Notably, the steric impediment presented by a methyl substituent
ortho to the amino function does not impact significantly upon the
efficiency of the process (entry 12). Finally, the reaction was found
to be general for simple (non-benzylic) substrates (entries 13 and
14). This is in contrast to our previously reported approach to
benzoxazoles commencing from aliphatic aldehydes, in which en-
amine-based pathways caused the formation of undesired 8-
hydroxyquinolines as the only observable products of the
reactions.10
In summary, we have developed a new oxidative approach to
benzoxazoles starting from primary amines as the source of the
C2-carbon,14 further broadening the scope of chemistry that can
be accomplished by hydrogen transfer from amines. The results
of further studies from our laboratories in the latter area will be
disclosed in due course.
Acknowledgement
We thank the EPSRC for funding through Grants EP/F038321/1
and EP/F0376431/1. SPM is a Royal Society Industry Fellow
(2008-10).
References and notes
1. See, for example, UK-1 (Ueki, M.; Ueno, K.; Miyadoh, S.; Abe, K.; Shibata, K.;
Taniguchi, M.; Oi, S. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 1089), the boxazomycins (Kusumi, T.;
Ooi, T.; Wälchli, M. R.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 110, 2954) and
calcimycin (Chaney, M. O.; Demarco, P. V.; Jones, N. D.; Occolowitz, J. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1932).
2. For recent examples, see: (a) Yoshida, S.; Watanabe, T.; Sato, Y. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2007, 15, 3515; (b) Wang, B.; Vernier, J.-M.; Rao, S.; Chung, J.; Anderson,
J. J.; Brodkin, J. D.; Jiang, X.; Gardner, M. F.; Yang, X.; Munoz, B. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2004, 12, 17; (c) Gong, B.; Hong, F.; Kohm, C.; Bonham, L.; Klein, P. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 1455.
3. For discussion of general synthetic approaches to benzoxazoles, see: (a) Boyd,
G. V.. In Science of Synthesis; Schaumann, E., Ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart, 2002; Vol.
11, pp 481–492; (b) Döpp, H.; Döpp, D.. In Houben-Weyl: Methoden der
Organischen Chemie; Schaumann, E., Ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart, 1993; Vol. E8a, pp
1020–1193.
4. For recent transition metal catalysed approaches to benzoxazoles from ortho-
haloanilines, see: (a) Viirre, R. D.; Evindar, G.; Batey, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
3452; (b) Bonnamour, J.; Bolm, C. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2665; (c) Barbero, N.;
Carril, M.; San Martin, R.; Dominguez, E. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 10425; (d)