9961
Scheme 2.
References
1. Green, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1999; 3rd
ed. p. 556.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
. Schallenberg, E. E.; Calvin, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 2779.
. Staab, H. A.; Wather, G. Angew. Chem. 1960, 72, 35.
. Keumi, T.; Shimada, M.; Morita, T.; Kitajima, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 2252.
. Forbus, T. R.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 313.
. Forbus, T. R.; Taylor, S. L.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4156.
. Bergeron, R. J.; Mc Manis, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3108.
. Katritzky, A. R.; Yang, B.; Semenzin, D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 726.
. Katritzky, A. R.; Yang, B.; Qiu, G.; Zhang, Z. Synthesis 1999, 55.
1
1
1
1
1
0. Fieser, L. F.; Fieser, M. Reagents for Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1967; Vol. 1, p. 1221.
1. Curphey, T. J. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2805.
2. Hofle, G.; Steglich, W.; Vorbruggen, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 569.
3. Scriven, E. F. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1983, 12, 129.
4. General Procedure: A round-bottomed flask, equipped with a magnetic stirrer bar and a reflux condenser, was
charged with an appropriate aniline (10.0 mmol), THF (7.0 mL), ethyl trifluoroacetate (11.35 mmol or specified
amount in Tables 1 and 2), and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (1.0 mmol or specified amount in Tables 1 and 2). The
flask was immersed in an 85–90°C oil bath and the mixture was refluxed for 24 h (or specified time in Tables 1
and 2). The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. The reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate and the solution
was washed with 2N HCl and water sequentially (the organic layer was washed with water only for entries 6–8
in Table 2). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated. The product was
purified either by recrystallization from ethyl acetate and hexane mixture or by a flash chromatography on silica
1
gel. All the compounds gave satisfactory spectroscopic data. 9: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) l 2.02 (s, 1H), 2.89
3
(
t, 2H, J=5.2 Hz), 4.02 (t, 2H, J=5.2 Hz), 7.2 (m, 2H), 7.31 (m, 1H), 7.86 (d, 1H, J=7.9 Hz), 10.31 (bs, 1H).
1
1
7
2
1: H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d ) l 4.51 (s, 2H), 7.16 (d, 1H, J=7.53 Hz), 7.35 (dd, 1H, J=7.53 and 8.28 Hz),
6
1
.53 (d, 1H, J=8.28 Hz), 7.67 (s, 1H), 11.23 (bs, 1H). 14: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) l 1.02 (d, 6H, J=6.4 Hz),
.77 (m, 1H), 3.7 (s, 2H), 7.26 (d, 2H, J=8.46 Hz), 7.42 (d, 2H, J=8.46 Hz). 15: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl )
3
1
3
l 2.26 (bs, 1H), 2.66 (m, 2H), 3.02 (m, 2H), 3.57 (m, 1H), 3.85 (s, 2H), 7.02–7.16 (m, 3H), 7.23 (d, 1H, J=7.9
1
Hz), 7.32 (s, 1H), 7.56 (m, 1H), 8.45 (d, 1H, J=4.71 Hz), 9.12 (bs, 1H). 16: H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) l 3.93
3
(d, 3H, J=4.9 Hz), 7.36–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.86 (m, 1H).
15. O’Sullivan, M. C.; Dalrymple, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3451.
16. Xu, D.; Prasad, K.; Repic, O.; Blacklock, T. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3451.
17. Prashad, M.; Prasad, K.; Repic, O.; Blacklock, T. J.; Prikoszovich, W. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 1999, 3, 409.
18. Hassner, A.; Krepski, L. R.; Alexanian, V. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 2069.
19. Haslam, E. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 2409.
.
.