11298
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11298-11299
Excited-State Lifetime Modulation in
Triphenylene-Based Conjugated Polymers
Scheme 1
Aimee Rose, Claus G. Lugmair, and Timothy M. Swager*
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Department of Chemistry
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
ReceiVed July 19, 2001
Conjugated polymers are an extraordinary conduit for the
transport of electronic excitations1 to segments with the greatest
effective conjugation length. To provide the highest amplification
in sensory schemes5 we are interested in enhancing energy
migration. Such improvements will allow the excitation a greater
diffusion length and a higher probability of encountering a
receptor occupied by an analyte. The high efficiency of energy
-4
5-7
transfer in conjugated systems relative to systems with pendant
chromophores8 suggests that transport in these systems may be
enhanced by the strongly electronic coupled intrachain (Dexter-
type) processes in addition to the dipole-dipole (F o¨ rster-type)
processes that govern weakly interacting chromophores. To
determine the relative dominance of these types of processes we
have synthesized and studied polymers that by novel design have
longer excited-state lifetimes. Increases in lifetime imply a
reduction in transition dipole and should therefore decrease the
F o¨ rster rate, whereas transport by the Dexter mechanism should
be enhanced. We report herein that for isolated poly(arylene
ethynylenes) in solution that Dexter transport is dominant.
Poly(phenylene ethynylenes) (PPEs) have seen considerable
interest due to their rigid geometry and ability to effectively
transfer energy over long distances.10 To modify the lifetimes of
these systems we have chosen to incorporate into the polymer
backbone triphenylene chromophores with a well-known11 sym-
,9
desirable thin film photophysical properties, the present study is
restricted to solution measurements on isolated polymers.
The triphenylene monomer is synthesized as depicted in
Scheme 1 with an overall yield of 12%. Iodination of 1,2
dialkoxybenzene with periodic acid and iodine15 affords the 3,4-
dialkoxyiodobenzene (1), and a subsequent zinc/palladium (0)
coupling16 generates the 3,3′,4,4′-tetraalkoxybiphenyl (2) in high
yields. The latter reaction offers an alternative to the conventional
Ulman coupling which required exclusion of air and high
temperature and in our hands led to inferior yields. Iron (III)
trichloride and p-dimethoxybenzene afford cyclization to the
triphenylene. Oxidative demethylation with cerium ammonium
nitrate forms the quinone (3). A Diels-Alder reaction in neat
cyclohexadiene incorportates the bicyclooctane moiety. The
isolated double bond is hydrogenated, and oxidation with potas-
sium bromate generates the tetrasubstituted quinone (6). Lithiated
trimethlysilane acetylide adds to the quinone carbonyls, and
subsequent reductive dehydroxalation with tin dichloride recon-
stitutes the triphenylene ring system. Deprotection with base gives
the key diethynyl triphenylene monomer (5) which is copolymer-
ized with diiodo-funtionalized monomers using the Sonogashira-
metrically forbidden S
0 1
-S transition. Clearly, the triphenylene
wavefunction12 will be perturbed, and the stringent symmetry
responsible for its optical properties will be broken; however,
we considered that this strongly aromatic structure should retain
some of its individual identity and that poly(triphenylene ethy-
nylenes) (TPPEs) would have extended excited-state lifetimes.
In addition to their desired electronic properties triphenylene
materials also have a tendency to form π-stacked discotic liqu3,i1d4
crystalline phases that facilitate charge and energy transport.1
While our monomer design gives rise to polymers that exhibit
17
Hagihara reaction. The exceptions are polymers 7 and 7a which
1
8
are made through an oxidative coupling method. Resulting
polymers and some of their physical properties are tabulated
(
1) Samuel, I. D. W.; Crystall, B.; Rumbles, G. P. L.; Holmes, A. B.; Friend,
R. H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 213, 472.
2) Pakbaz, K.; Lee, C. H.; Hagler, T. W.; McBranch, D.; Heeger, A. J.
(Table 1).
(
Matched pairs of PPEs and TPPEs were synthesized for
Synth. Met. 1994, 64, 295.
comparative photophysical studies (Figure 1). The differences in
the molecular weights of the materials as synthesized were in
some cases very large; hence, gel permeation chromatography
was used to obtain materials with more closely matched molecular
weights. The results have high self-consistency, and TPPEs exhibit
extended excited-state lifetimes over their PPE analogues as
depicted in Figure 2. The TPPEs demonstrate about a 30% lifetime
increase without severely compromising quantum yield. The
combination of Φ and τ data demonstrate that the enhanced
(
3) B a¨ ssler, H.; Schweitzer, B.; Huen, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 173.
(
4) (a) Rothberg, L. J.; Yan, M.; Papadimitrakopoulos, F.; Galvin, M. E.;
Kwock, E. W.; Synth. Met. 1996, 80, 41. (b) Yan, M.; Rothberg, L. J.;
Papadimitrakopoulos, F.; Galvin, M. E.; Miller, T. M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1994,
7
3, 744.
(
5) (a) Zhou, Q.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7017. (b)
Zhou, Q.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12593. (c) Yang,
J.-S.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5321.
(6) Devadoss, C.; Bharathi, P.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
9
635.
7) Ley, K. D.; Whittle, C. E.; Bartberger, M. D.; Schanze, K. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3423.
(
(
8) Guillet, J. Polymer Photophysics and Photochemistry: An Introduction
(13) (a) Warman, J. M.; Schouten, P. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17181.
(b) van de Craats, A. M.; de Haas, M. P.; Warman, J. M. Synth. Met. 1997,
86, 2125.
(14) Markovitski, D.; Lecuyer, I.; Lianos, P.; Malthete, J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1991, 87, 1785.
(15) Bacher, A.; Erdelen, C. H.; Paulus, W.; Ringsdorf, H.; Schimdt, H.-
W.; Schuhmacher P. Macromolecules, 1999, 32, 4551.
(16) Jacob, P.; Callery, P. S.; Shulgin, A. T.; Catagnoli, N. J. Org. Chem.
1976, 41, 3627.
to the Study of Photoprocesses in Macromolecules; Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1987.
(9) (a) Byers, J. D.; Friedrich, M. S.; Friesner, R. A.; Webber, S. E. In
Molecular Dynamics in Restricted Geometries; Klafter, J., Drake, J. M., Eds.;
Wiley: New York, 1988; pp 99-144. (b) Kiserow, D. J.; Itoh, Y.; Webber,
S. E. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 2934. (c) Levitsky, I. A.; Webber, S. E. J.
Lumin. 1998, 78, 147.
(
10) Bunz, U. H. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1605.
(
11) Markovitski, D.; Germain, A.; Millie, P.; Lecuyer, P.; Gallos, L. K.;
(17) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
4467.
(18) Williams, V. E.; Swager, T. M. J. Polym. Sci. A 2000, 33, 4069.
Argyrakis, P.; Bengs, H.; Ringsdorf, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 1005.
(
12) Etchegoin, P. Phys ReV. E 1997, 56, 538.
1
0.1021/ja016662l CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/17/2001