J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9561-9564
9561
Son och em ica l Rea ction s of Lea d
Sch em e 1
Tetr a ca r boxyla tes w ith Styr en e
Takashi Ando,*,† Takahide Kimura,†
†,‡,§
,‡
J ean-Marc Lev eˆ que,
J . Philip Lorimer,*
J ean-Louis Luche,*,§ and Timothy J . Mason‡
Department of Chemistry, Shiga University of Medical
Science, Seta, Otsu, Shiga 520-2192, J apan, School of
Natural and Environmental Sciences, Priory Street,
Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK,
and Laboratoire de Chimie Mol e´ culaire et
Sch em e 2
Environnement, Universit e´ de Savoie,
7
3376 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex, France
Received J une 17, 1998
In tr od u ction
Because of their mechanistic diversity, the reactions
of lead tetraacetate (LTA)1 with various substrates
constitute an ideal objective for sonochemical studies.2
An example of this is the reaction of LTA with styrene 1
in acetic acid solution or suspension which is able to
data also agree with a chain mechanism, easily inhibited
by oxygen or tert-butylcatechol.2
Notwithstanding this observation, many aspects of
these reactions, both conventional and sonochemical,
remain unclear. Thus, in the literature there are several
a,7-9
follow several mechanisms, each of which provides a
different product (Scheme 1).3 Reaction i implies an ionic
dissociation of the LTA oxidant, followed by an electro-
philic attack of the olefinic bond. Reaction ii involves a
preliminary one-electron oxidation of the olefin to a
references to this type of reaction, some run simply by
heating the styrene-LTA mixture,2
a,7
whereas others
4
report experiments performed in the presence of a base,
radical cation, although in this case it is also possible
2
b-d,8
for the reaction to follow a polar pathway.3b Whatever
the role of which is not clearly explained.
The
present study was undertaken to provide more mecha-
nistic elements, particularly with respect to the sonochem-
ical effect. A specific aim was to determine the experi-
mental conditions, sonochemical or conventional, that
might confer useful selectivity to the reaction. In
sonochemical reactions it is not firmly established where
the key step occurs, i.e., in the continuous liquid phase
or next to the cavitation bubble boundary, because
activation is not expected to occur inside the cavity
itself.2 It has been shown that the sonolysis of LTA is
extremely slow at temperatures up to 50 °C, leading to
the conclusion that the homolytic process can occur only
the mechanism, compound 3 is generally a minor con-
stituent of the mixture. The key step of reaction iii
consists of the addition to the double bond of a methyl
radical resulting formally from a homolysis of LTA. Most
of the published work shows that the pathway i is
predominant, although not exclusive.
Because one of the important features of sonication is
5
the enhancement of radical mechanisms, the oxidation
of styrene by LTA under ultrasound irradiation would
be expected to proceed with an increased selectivity in
c
favor of compound 4 (and possibly 3). This was indeed
observed,2a and this result constitutes an example of what
2
c
6
when LTA and styrene are present simultaneously, an
observation not explained by the currently accepted
mechanism.
has become known as sonochemical switching. All the
†
Shiga University of Medical Science.
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences.
Universit e´ de Savoie.
‡
§
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
(1) For general accounts on LTA reactions, see: (a) Criegee, R. In
Oxidation in Organic Chemistry; Wiberg, K. B., Ed., Academic Press:
New York, 1965; Part A. (b) Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J . K. Org. React.
To detect possible ligand exchange reactions occurring
during the reaction (see below), lead tetrapropanoate
1
972, 19, 279-421. (c) Mihailovic, M. L.; Cekovic, Z.; Lorenc, L. In
Organic Synthesis by Oxidation with Metal Compounds; Mijs, W. G.;
De J onge, C. R. H. I., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1986; pp 741-
8
(
2
LTP) was chosen as the reagent in place of LTA (Scheme
).
There is a distinct lack of accurate data concerning the
16.
(
2) For previous papers on this topic, see: (a) Ando, T.; Bauchat, P.;
Foucaud, A.; Fujita, M.; Kimura, T.; Sohmiya, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
991, 32, 6379-6382. (b) Ando, T.; Fujita, M.; Bauchat, P.; Foucaud,
10
reaction of LTP with styrene, and so a series of
experiments were performed in the first instance to
rectify this and the results are summarized in Table 1.
The optimal stirring rate (600 rpm) was determined in a
1
A.; Sohmiya, H.; Kimura, T. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 1994, 1, 33-
3
5
5. (c) Kimura, T.; Fujita, M.; Sohmiya, H.; Ando, T. Chem. Lett. 1995,
5-56. (d) Ando, T.; Fujita, M.; Kimura, T.; Lev eˆ que, J . M.; Luche, J .
L.; Sohmiya, H. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 1996, 3, 223-227.
(3) (a) Criegee, R. Angew. Chem. 1958, 70, 173-181. (b) House, H.
O. Modern Organic Reactions; Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Com-
pany: Menlo Park, CA, 1972; pp 379-380.
(7) Norman, R. O. C.; Thomas, C. B. J . Chem. Soc. B 1967, 771-
779.
(8) Heiba, E. I.; Dessau, R. M.; Koehl, W. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968,
90, 2706-2707.
(9) (a) Kochi, J . K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3609-3619. (b)
Kochi, J . K. J . Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 3265-3271.
(10) Yukawa, Y.; Sakai, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1963, 36, 761-
762.
(4) Norman, J . A.; Thomas, C. B.; Burrow, M. J . J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1087-1093.
5) Luche, J . L.; Einhorn, C.; Einhorn, J .; Sinisterra-Gago, J . V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4125-4129.
6) Ando, T.; Sumi, S.; Kawate, T.; Ichihara, J .; Hanafusa, T. J .
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 439-440.
(
(
1
0.1021/jo981168u CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/14/1998