using 18OH2 as solvent (label content 97%). The reaction was
stopped at two different intervals, after 22 and 110 h, respect-
ively. The enantiomeric purity of the diol (2R,3R)-5a formed
and of the remaining non-hydrolysed epoxide (2R,3S)-5 were
determined by GLC analysis and the label-distribution was
analysed by GLC/MS on a chiral stationary phase (Table 3).
These data were used for the calculation of the relative kis. As
may be seen from Table 4 (entries 1 and 2), the values for the
relative rate constants were within a very narrow margin of
experimental error, indicating the applicability of the math-
ematical model and the validity of the basic assumptions for
the time period investigated. Analysis of the relative rate con-
stants for substrate ( )-5 reveals that the (2S,3R)-epoxide (B,
Scheme 4) is the fast reacting enantiomer, which is hydrolysed
with excellent regioselectivity at the more accessible C-2 atom
(k4/k3 >300:1). On the other hand, the (2R,3S)-enantiomer
(A) is transformed about 14 times slower (k3 ϩ k4/k1 ϩ k2 =
327:23) and low regioselectivity in favour of the sterically
more hindered C-3 atom is observed (k2/k1 = 17:5). Although
the selectivity for the enantiodiscrimination per se is relatively
low (E ~14–17),22 the fact that both enantiomers are hydro-
lysed with opposite regioselectivity yields (2R,3R)-5a in >95%
enantiomeric excess. Since both epoxide substrate enantiomers
are hydrolysed to give the same (2R,3R)-diol product, the
reaction constitutes an enantioconvergent process. Thus it can
be run to completion and 100% theoretical yield can be
accrued.
Comparable results—i.e. low to moderate enantioselectivity in
favour of the (2S,3R)-enantiomer of 5 (E ~6)22 with matching
(opposite) regioselectivity—were obtained for Rhodococcus
ruber DSM 43338 (Table 4, entry 3). On the other hand, signifi-
cantly lower regio- and enantio-selectivities were observed with
Rhodococcus equi IFO 3730 (entry 4).
A similar situation was found for the trans-configurated sub-
strate ( )-1. Both strains investigated showed reduced enantio-
selectivities, mainly due to the drop of the k4-values by about
one order of magnitude, while the regioselectivities remained
within the same range. Thus, the enantiomeric purity of diol
(2R,3S)-1a did not exceed a value of 90%.
ative chromatography was performed on silica gel Merck 60
(40–63 µm). The ee of epoxides and diols was determined by
GLC (Shimadzu GC-14A, equipped with FID) on a CP-
Chirasil-DEX CB column (25 m; 0.32 mm; 0.25 µm film; H2).
GLC/MS data were recorded on an HP 6890 GC/MS spec-
trometer. The EI quadrupole detector was set to 70 eV, 130 ЊC,
auxiliary temp. 180 ЊC. 18O-Labelled water (95–98% 18O-
content) was purchased from Promochem. Optical rotation
values were measured on a Perkin-Elmer polarimeter 341 at
589 nm (Na-line) in a 1 dm cuvette, and are given in units of
1
10Ϫ1 deg cm2 gϪ1. H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in
CDCl3 solution on a Bruker MSL 300 (300 MHz and 75.47
MHz, respectively). Chemical shifts are reported in δ from
SiMe4 as internal standard; coupling constants are given in Hz.
Light petroleum refers to the fraction with distillation range
60–90 ЊC.
Synthesis of substrates
Epoxides ( )-1–6 were obtained via epoxidation of the corres-
ponding alkene (17 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 cm3) using m-
chloroperbenzoic acid (70%; 1.2 mol equiv.) containing finely
powdered K2CO3 (2 mol equiv.) at 0 ЊC (14 h). After extractive
work-up (10% aq. Na2S2O5, then saturated aq. NaHCO3), the
organic layer was dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated, and the
products were distilled through a short Vigreux column; yields
ranged from 58 to 96%.
trans-2,3-Epoxyheptane 1. δH 0.88 (t, J 7.0, 3 H, 7-H3), 1.12
(d, J 6.0, 3 H, 1-H3), 1.21–1.44 (m, 6 H, 4-, 5- and 6-H2), 2.41
(dt, Jt 5.3, Jd 2.2, 1 H, 3-H) and 2.55 (dq, Jq 5.2, Jd 2.2, 1 H,
2-H); δC 13.73 (C-7), 17.43 (C-1), 22.40 (C-6), 28.03 (C-5),
31.62 (C-4), 54.23 (C-2) and 59.46 (C-3).
trans-3,4-Epoxyheptane 2. δH 0.82–0.93 (m, 6 H, 1- and 7-H3),
1.43–1.55 (m, 6 H, 2-, 5- and 6-H2) and 2.52–2.63 (m, 2 H, 3-
and 4-H); δC 9.73, 13.75, 19.25, 25.08, 34.06, 58.18 and 59.65.
trans-2,3-Epoxyoctane 3. δH 0.80 (t, J 7.0, 3 H, 8-H3), 1.16–
1.43 (m, 11 H, 1-H3, 4–7-H2), 2.52 (dt, Jt 5, Jd 2.0, 1 H, 3-H) and
2.64 (dq, Jq 6.0, Jd 2.0, 1 H, 2-H); δC 13.90, 17.61, 22.54 and
25.65 (C-5), 31.61, 31.97 (C-1 and -4), 54.45 (C-3) and 59.72
(C-2).
Finally, the applicability of the enantioconvergent biocat-
alytic hydrolysis was demonstrated with a preparative-scale
reaction. Thus, when substrate ( )-5 was treated with lyophil-
ized cells of Nocardia EH1 until the starting material had been
completely consumed, diol (R,R)-5a was isolated in 79% chem-
ical yield and 91% enantiomeric purity as the sole product.
Cases for a non-classical deracemization of epoxides, which
leads to the highly desired formation of a single product enan-
tiomer in 100% theoretical yield, are rare. For instance, the
hydrolysis of ( )-3,4-epoxytetrahydropyran23 and several cis-β-
alkyl-substituted styrene oxides24 by hepatic microsomal
epoxide hydrolase proceeded in an enantioconvergent manner
leading to the corresponding (R,R)-diols as the sole product.
Similarly, soybean epoxide hydrolase converted ( )-cis-9,10-
epoxyoctadec-12(Z)-enoic and ( )-cis-12,13-epoxydec-9(Z)-
enoic acid into the corresponding (R,R)-dihydroxy acids.25 All
of the above-mentioned transformations, however, were aimed
at the elucidation of enzyme mechanisms and were performed
only on an analytical (<1 mmol) scale. It was only recently that
preparative-scale hydrolysis of ( )-cis-β-methylstyrene oxide by
the fungus Beauveria bassiana9 was reported to afford (1R,2R)-
1-phenylpropane-1,2-diol in 85% yield and 98% ee. However,
in none of these studies were the kinetics of these systems
investigated.
trans-2,3-Epoxynonane 4. δH 0.80 (t, J 7.0, 3 H, 9-H3), 1.16–
1.48 (m, 13 H, 1-H3, 4–8-H2), 2.53 (dt, Jd 2.0, Jt 8.0, 1 H, 3-H)
and 2.64 (dq, Jd 2.0, Jq 5.0, 1 H, 2-H); δC 13.98 (C-9), 17.61,
22.53, 25.94, 29.09, 31.74, 32.02, 54.45 (C-2) and 59.72 (C-3).
cis-2,3-Epoxyheptane 5. δH 0.87 (t, J 7.0, 3 H, 7-H3), 1.21 (d,
J 6.0, 3 H, 1-H3), 1.25–1.52 (m, 6 H, 4–6-H2), 2.85 (dq, Jq 6.2,
Jd 2.0, 1 H, 2-H) and 2.98 (dt, Jt 5.5, Jd 2.0, 1 H, 3-H); δC 13.15
(C-7), 13.98 (C-1), 22.57 (C-6), 27.21 (C-5), 28.58 (C-4), 52.60
(C-2) and 57.1 (C-3).
cis-3,4-Epoxyheptane 6. δH 0.83–0.95 (m, 6 H, 1- and 7-H3),
1.32–1.52 (m, 6 H, 2-, 5- and 6-H2) and 2.71–2.86 (m, 2 H,
3- and 4-H); δC 10.47, 13.52, 19.86, 21.06, 29.67, 56.98 and
58.13.
Synthesis of reference material
Diols ( )-1a–6a were obtained via OsO4-catalysed dihydroxyl-
ation of the corresponding Z- or E-alkene (5 mmol) in acetone
(5 cm3) using N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (6 mmol) as reoxi-
dant (0 ЊC, 12 h). After extractive work-up (10% aq. Na2S2O5,
semisaturated aq. NH4Cl) the products were purified via silica
gel chromatography. Yields ranged from 54 to 80%.
erythro-Heptane-2,3-diol 1a. δH 0.85 (t, J 7.0, 3 H, 7-H3), 1.05
(d, J 7.0, 3 H, 1-H3), 1.22–1.50 (m, 6 H, 4–6-H2), 2.20–2.45 (s,
br, 2 H, OH) and 3.55–3.65 and 3.72–3.83 (m, 2 × 1 H, 2- and 3-
H); δC 13.99 (C-7), 16.25 (C-1), 22.73 (C-6), 28.32 (C-5), 31.51
(C-4), 70.44 (C-2) and 74.91 (C-3).
erythro-Heptane-3,4-diol 2a. δH 0.92 (t, J 7.0, 3 H, 7-H3), 0.96
(t, J 7.0, 3 H, 1-H3), 1.05–1.60 (m, 6 H, 2-, 5- and 6-H2) and
3.44–3.68 (m, 2 H, 3- and 4-H); δC 10.01 (C-7), 14.10 (C-1),
18.85 (C-6), 26.32 (C-2), 35.61 (C-5), 73.94 and 76.03 (C-3,
-4).
Experimental
Reactions were monitored by TLC (silica gel Merck 60 F254),
compounds were visualized by spraying with vanillin–conc.
H2SO4 (5 g dmϪ3) or Mo-reagent [(NH4)6Mo7O24ؒ4H2O (1.1 g
dmϪ3), Ce(SO4)2ؒ4H2O (4 g dmϪ3) in H2SO4 (10%)]. Prepar-
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1997
3633