Molecules 2019, 24, 2260
8 of 10
operating at 300 MHz (Bruker Avance 300, Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA). Proton chemical shifts
were reported in ppm ( ) with the solvent reference relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) employed as the
internal standard (CDCl3,
= 7.26 ppm). 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on 300 MHz spectrometers
(Bruker Fourier 300) operating at 75 MHz, with complete proton decoupling. Carbon chemical shifts
were reported in ppm ( ) relative to TMS with the respective solvent resonance as the internal standard
(CDCl3,
= 77.0 ppm). 19F-NMR spectra were recorded on 300 MHz spectrometers (Bruker Fourier
300) operating at 282.1 MHz. Fluorine chemical shifts were reported in ppm ( ) relative to CF3Cl with
the respective solvent resonance as the internal standard (CDCl3, = 77.0 ppm). Mass spectra and
δ
δ
δ
δ
δ
δ
accurate mass analysis were carried out on a VG AUTOSPEC-M246 spectrometer (MasSpec Consulting
Inc.,Oakville, ON, Canada, double-focusing magnetic sector instrument with EBE geometry) equipped
with an EI source or with an LCQ Fleet ion trap mass spectrometer, ESI source, with acquisition in
positive ionization mode in the mass range of 50–2000 m/z. X-ray data were collected on a Bruker
Smart Apex CCD area detector (Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA) equipped with a fine-focus sealed
tube operating at 50 kV and 30 mA, using graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å).
The fluidic device was realized by assembling coil-reactors, connected by T-junctions using standard
HPLC connectors. Coil-reactors consisted of PTFE tubing (diameter: 0.58 mm) coiled in a bundle.
Syringe pump: Chemix Fusion 100, equipped with two Hamilton gastight syringes.
Dry solvents were purchased and stored under nitrogen over molecular sieves (bottles with crown
caps). All chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification
unless otherwise specified.
4.1. General Procedure for the Stereoselective Catalytic Reduction of Enamine 5 under Batch Conditions
Dry DMF or the appropriate catalytic chiral Lewis base in the reported amount (Table 1), and
a 0.1 M solution of enamine
5 (1 equiv.) in dry CH2Cl2 were introduced in a round bottomed flask
under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was cooled down to the indicated temperature and HSiCl3
(3.5 equiv.) was added to the reaction mixture. After the desired time, the reaction was quenched with
a 4 M solution of NaOH until basic pH was reached. The resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2,
separated, and the organic phase dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and the residue purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes/EtOAc =
98:2) to afford 6 as a colorless oil.
4.2. General Procedure for the Multistep Formation and Stereoselective Catalytic Reduction of Enamine 5 under
Flow Conditions
Two 2.5 mL Hamilton gastight syringes, one containing compound 10 (2 mL of a 0.8 M solution in
CH2Cl2, 1.03 equiv.) and the other compound
connected by a PEEK tee junction to a 250 L PTFE coil reactor. Both syringes fed the solutions at
L/min, giving a residence time of 10 min. The outcome of the reactor was connected to another tee
junction, fed by a 1 mL Hamilton gastight syringe, containing cat. ent-I (0.8 mL of 0.4 M solution in
CH2Cl2, 0.2 equiv.), feeding at 2.5 L/min. The outcome of this second tee was connected to another
tee junction, fed by a 5 mL Hamilton gastight syringe, containing HSiCl3 (3.3 mL of a 1.9 M solution
in CH2Cl2, 4 equiv.) with a flow rate of 10 L/min. The outcome of this third tee was connected to a
1000 L PTFE coil reactor, with a total flow rate of 24.5 L/min, and a subsequent residence time of
4 (2 mL of a 0.8 M solution in CH2Cl2, 1 equiv.) were
µ
6
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
40 min. The outcome of the reactor was collected into a NaOH 4 M solution at 0 ◦C. After the first two
volumes were discharged, steady state conditions were reached. The conversion was reported as an
average of three reactors volume, separately collected, and confirmed as isolated yield.
Supplementary Materials: The supplementary materials are available online.
Author Contributions: Methodology and experimental work: M.P.; X-ray analysis and absolute configuration
determination A.F.; Validation: M.P. and A.P.; Data Curation: A.P. and L.R.; conceptualization and supervision: M.B.
Funding: This research was funded by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant agreement number 812944 “TECHNOTRAIN”.