Article
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 58, No. 9, 2010 5475
MATERIALS AND METHODS
vacuo, and the gummy residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (10 mL). This
mixture was washed with water (20 mL), and water was back-extracted
with ethyl acetate (2 ꢀ 15 mL). The organic layers were dried over sodium
sulfate, and solvents were removed in vacuo. The resulting pale yellow,
semisolid residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography
(EtOAc/petroleum ether, 1:2), which yielded methyl-3,4-isopropylidene-
shikimate 55 as white crystals (515 mg, 2.25 mmol, 85%): 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.91 (1H, t, J = 4.0, 2.6 Hz, -CdCH), 4.73 (1H, t, J =
9.6, 9.4 Hz, -C;H), 4.10 (1H, t, J = 13.7 Hz, 6.4, -C;H), 3.90 (1H, m,
-C;H), 3.76 (3H, s, -(CO)OCH3), 2.79 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 4.6 Hz, H-
6eq), 2.55 (1H, s, OH), 2.23 (1H, ddt, J = 17.4, 8.2, 2.3 Hz, H-6 ax), 1.43
(3H, s, Me), 1.39 (3H, s, Me); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.0, 133.7,
129.1, 111.1, 71.8, 69.3, 51.7, 30.9, 29.2, 26.2, 21.1, 21.1.
All of the chemicals (analytical grade) were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich (Bremen, Germany). Green dry yerba mate
were purchased from two supermarkets in Bremen, Germany.
Sample Preparation. Green dry yerba mate leaves (5 g) were roasted
in an oven (110 °C for 5 h), extracted with methanol (100 mL), homo-
genized with a blender, and ultrasonicated for 5 min. This extract was
filtered through a Whatman no. 1 filter paper. The methanol was removed
by vacuum evaporation, and the extract was stored at -20 °C. When
required, it was thawed at room temperature, dissolved in methanol
(120 mg/10 mL of methanol), filtered through a membrane filter, and
used directly for LC-MS. Similar extraction and sample preparation
´
leaves (Argentina)
´
methods have been used for the green dry yerba mate
roasting.
UV Irradiation. The prepared samples of the green and roasted mate
´
leaves without
Synthesis of 5-(3,4-Diacetyl)-3,4-isopropylidene-caffeoylshikimic Acid
(56). To a solution of 3,4-isopropylidene shikimic acid 55 (100 mg, 0.46
mmol) and DMAP (5 mg, 0.04 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) were added
pyridine (4 mL) and 3,4-diacetylcaffeic acid chloride 54 (129 mg, 0.46
mmol) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h and
acidified with 1 M HCl (pH ≈3). The layers were separated, and the
aqueous phase was re-extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 ꢀ 15 mL). The combined
organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and filtered, and the solvents were
dried in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatogra-
phy (petroleum ether/EtOAc 3:1) to give the title compound 56 as a yellow
´
(1 mL of each) were placed in a photoreactor (Luzchem LZC-4 V, Ottawa,
Canada) under a shortwave UV lamp and irradiated at 245 nm for 40 min.
LC-MSn. The LC equipment (Agilent 1100 series, Bremen, Germany)
comprised a binary pump, an autosampler with a 100 μL loop, and a diode
array detector with a light-pipe flow cell (recording at 320 and 254 nm and
scanning from 200 to 600 nm). This was interfaced with an ion-trap mass
spectrometer fitted with an ESI source (Bruker Daltonics HCT Ultra,
Bremen, Germany) operating in Auto-MSn mode to obtain fragment ion
m/z. As necessary, MS2, MS3, and MS4 fragment-targeted experiments
were performed to focus only on compounds producing a parent ion at m/z
335.1, 337.1, 349.1, 353.1, 367.1, 497.2, 499.2, 515.2, 529.2, 543.2, 559.2,
659.3, or 677.3. Tandem mass spectra were acquired in Auto-MSn mode
(smart fragmentation) using a ramping of the collision energy. Maximum
fragmentation amplitude was set to 1 V, starting at 30% and ending at
200%. MS operating conditions (negative mode) had been optimized
using 5-caffeoylquinic acid (3) with a capillary temperature of 365 °C, a dry
gas flow rate of 10 L/min, and a nebulizer pressure of 10 psi.
High-resolution LC-MS was carried out using the same HPLC
equipped with a MicrOTOF Focus mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics)
fitted with an ESI source, and internal calibration was achieved with 10mL
of 0.1 M sodium formate solution injected through a six-port valve prior to
each chromatographic run. Calibration was carried out using the en-
hanced quadratic calibration mode. It should be noted that in TOF
calibration the intensities of the measured peaks have a significant
influence on the magnitude of the mass error with high-intensity peaks
resulting in detector saturation displaying larger mass errors. Usually this
problem can be overcome by using spectra averaging on the side flanks of
a chromatographic peak orusing a moredilute sampleas carried out in this
case. All MS measurements were carried out in the negative ion mode.
HPLC. Separation was achieved on a 150 ꢀ 3 mm i.d. column con-
taining diphenyl 5 μm with a 4 ꢀ 3 mm i.d. guard column of the same
material (Varian, Darmstadt, Germany). Solvent A was water/formic acid
(1000:0.05 v/v), and solvent B was methanol. Solvents were delivered at a
total flow rate of 500 μL/min. The gradient profile was from 10% B to
70% B linearly in 60 min followed by 10 min isocratic and a return to 10%
B at 80 min and 10 min isocratic to re-equilibrate.
1
oil (33.3%): H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (1H, d, J = 15.8 Hz,
-CdCH), 7.36 (1H, dd, J = 7.5, 1.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.32 (1H, d, J = 1.6 Hz,
Ar-H), 6.90 (1H, t, J 2.5, 1.4, Ar-H), 6.34 (1H, d, J 16.1, -CdCH), 5.26
(1H, dd, J 11.0, 6.19, -C;H), 4.74 (1H, m, -C;H), 4.28 (1H, t, J = 6.19
Hz, -C;H), 3.75 (3H, s, -(CO)OCH3), 2.82 (1H, dd, J = 17.8, 4.5 Hz,
-C;H), 2.41 (1H, dd, J = 17.5, 6.2 Hz, -C;H), 2.3 (6H, s, -(CO)CH3),
1.39 (3H, s, -CH3), 1.37 (3H, s, -CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
168.1, 168.1, 166.5, 165.8, 143.6, 142.5, 134.3, 133.0, 129.5, 126.3, 123.9,
122.7, 118.9, 110.2, 74.0, 71.9, 70.1, 52.2, 27.9, 26.5, 25.9, 20.7, 20.7.
For the deprotection of 55, a suspension of the methyl-3,4-isopropy-
lideneshikimate ester 56 (515 mg, 2.25 mmol) in KOH solution (10 mL,
1M) was stirred at room temperature for 30 min, and the reaction mixture
was neutralized by the addition of acidic ion-exchange resin (Amberlite IR
400, 2 g). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 ꢀ 20 mL),
combined organic layers were dried over sodium sulfate, and solvent was
evaporated in vacuo. The resulting ester was dissolved in a mixture of
20 mL of trifluoroacetic acid and water (7:3) at room temperature and
stirred for 30 min. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the resulting
yellowish crude product that was analyzed by 1H NMR and HPLC-MS
and showed a single caffeoyl shikimic acid derivative, 52, at m/z 335.1.
Synthesis of Bisacetal Protected Shikimic Acid 57. To a suspension of
shikimic acid (500 mg, 2.87 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) were added 2,3-
butanedione (0.48 mL, 5.5 mmol), trimethylorthoformate (1.1 mL,
10 mmol), and D-camphorsulfonic acid (50 mg, 0.01 mmol). The mixture
was reflux for 16 h, then cooled to room temperature, and treated with
sodium bicarbonate (80 mg, 0.80 mmol). The solvent was removed in
vacuo to give a paste that was dissolved in ethyl acetate. Activatedcharcoal
(2 g) was added, and the mixture was refluxed for 2 h and then left to cool
to room temperature. The mixture was filtered over a thick pad of silica
gel, which was further washed using ethyl acetate/methanol (9:1), and the
resulting colorless filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to give a white solid.
The crude was recrystallized from ethyl acetate to form the white shiny
needles of bisacetal-protected methyl shikimate 57 (693 mg, 2.29 mmol,
80%): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.86 (1H, dd, J = 5.5, 2.7 Hz, H-2),
4.34, (1H, t, J = 4.6 Hz, H-4), 4.07 (1H, ddd, J = 10.4, 5.9, 5.5 Hz, H-5),
3.72 (3H, s, OMe), 3.57 (1H, dd, J = 10.5, 4.6 Hz, H-4), 3.28 (3H, s, OMe),
3.24 (3H, s, OMe), 2.84 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 5.9 Hz, H-6eq), 2.25 (1H, ddd,
J = 17.4, 10.4, 2.7 Hz, H-6ax), 1.38 (3H, s, Me), 1.31 (3H, s, Me); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.6 (CdO), 135.1 (CdC), 132.2 (CdC),
100.1 (OCOMe), 99.3 (OCOMe), 70.6 (C3), 65.1 (C;O), 62.5 (C;O),
52.3 (COOMe), 48.1 (OMe), 48.0 (OMe), 30.1 (C6), 17.9 (Me), 17.7 (Me).
(a) Synthesis of Bisacetal-Protected 3-(3,4-Diacetyl-caffeoyl)-
5-shikimic Acid Methyl Ester 58. To a solution of bisacetal-protected
shikimic acid 57 (132 mg, 0.46 mmol) and DMAP (5 mg, 0.04 mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (15 mL) were added pyridine (4 mL) and 3,4-diacetylcaffeic acid
chloride 54 (129 mg, 0.46 mmol) at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 12 h and acidified with 1 M HCl (pH ≈3). The
layers were separated, and the aqueous phase was re-extracted with
Synthesis of Mixture of Regioisomers of Caffeoylshikimic Acid (44, 45,
and 52). To a solution of shikimic acid (80 mg, 0.46 mmol) and DMAP
(5 mg, 0.04 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) were added pyridine (3 mL) and 3,4-
diacetylcaffeic acid chloride (129 mg, 0.46 mmol) at room temperature.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h and acidified with 1 M HCl
(pH ≈3). The layers were separated, and the aqueous phase was re-
extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 ꢀ 15 mL). The combined organic layers were
dried over Na2SO4 and filtered, and the solvents were dried in vacuo. The
resulting ester was dissolved in a mixture of 20 mL of trifluoroacetic acid
and water (7:3) at room temperature and stirred for 30 min. The solvents
were removed in vacuo, and the resulting yellowish product was analyzed
by HPLC-MS (see conditions above) and shown to contain a mixture of
45, 44, and 52.
Synthesis of 3,4-Isopropylidene Shikimic Acid. A mixture of methyl
shikimate 53 (500 mg, 2.66 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate
(5 mg, 0.029 mmol), 2,2-dimethoxypropane (2 g, 19.2 mmol), and acetone
(10 g) was heated at reflux for 4 h. The reaction was cooled to room
temperature and neutralized by the addition of sodium methoxide (16 mg,
0.30 mmol) in methanol (2 mL). Most of the solvent was removed in