Ha m m ett Cor r ela tion s in th e P h otosen sitized Oxid a tion of
-Su bstitu ted Th ioa n isoles
4
Sergio M. Bonesi, Maurizio Fagnoni, and Angelo Albini*
Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Pavia, via Taramelli 10, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Received November 14, 2003
Singlet oxygen is quenched by a series of 4-substituted thioanisoles (methoxy to nitro), with rate
4
6
-1 -1
constant k
t
) 7 × 10 to 7 × 10 M
s , close to the value observed for the myoglobin-catalyzed
-
1
sulfoxidation of the same sulfides. Correlations with σ (F ) -1.97) and with Eox (slope -3.9 V )
are evidence for an electrophilic mechanism. In methanol sulfoxides are formed (85%) via an
intermediate quenched by diphenyl sulfoxide; competing minor paths lead to arylthiols, arylsulfenic
acid, and aryl sulfoxides. In aprotic solvents, the sulfoxidation is quite sluggish, but carboxylic
acids (mostly e0.1 M) enhance the rate by a factor of >100. The protonated persulfoxide is formed
in this case and acts as an electrophile with sulfides, again with a rate constant correlating with
σ (F ) -1.78).
The oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides is an important
process from both the synthetic and mechanistic points
of view, and many reagents are available for the conver-
sion.1 The reaction with singlet oxygen is an appealing
procedure, in view of the mild conditions, but the outcome
is highly dependent on the reagent structure and on the
conditions, and the reaction has proved to be mechanisti-
cally intricate. In fact, according to the solvent chosen,
formation of the sulfoxide involves different intermedi-
ates, the structure of which has been clarified through
trapping studies and computations.4 The Hammett
criterion was used early to establish the electrophilic
SCHEME 1
,2
7
been performed by using a variety of inorganic reagents,
enzymes,8 and photochemical methods not involving
singlet oxygen.9 This prompted us to investigate the
reaction of singlet oxygen with a series of thioanisoles,
taking advantage of the fact that direct measurement of
the quenching of O
3
1
2
allows the determination of a larger
character of initial attack of singlet oxygen onto thioani-
span of k
t
than previous less sensitive methods. In
5
soles (rate constant k
t
, Scheme 1), though the span of σ
10
addition, recent evidence suggest that protic additives,
explored has been relatively small. The Hammet crite-
rion, however, has not been used to determine the
electronic character of the second step (k ).
r
11
12
zeolites, and clays can make reluctant photooxidations
of sulfides more efficient, thus broadening the scope of
the reaction as a preparative method.
In general, aryl alkyl (as well as diaryl) sulfides appear
to be less reactive and have received less attention than
dialkyl derivatives, though some thioanisoles have been
Resu lts
6
considered in important mechanistic papers. On the
Qu en ch in g of Sin glet Oxygen . Thioanisole (1a ) and
a series of ring-substituted derivatives (1b-f) were
other hand, the (enantioselective) oxidation of thioani-
2
soles is quite important for several applications and has
(
7) Acquaye, J . H.; Muller, J . G.; Takeuchi, K. J . Inorg. Chem. 1993,
(
1) Uemura, S. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, M. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: New York, 1991; Vol. 7, p 758.
2) Carre n˜ o, M. C. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1717. Baumstark, A. L.
Bioorg. Chem. 1986, 14, 326.
3) (a) Liang, J . J .; Gu, C. L.; Kacher, M. L.; Foote, C. S. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 4717. (b) Clennan, E. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001,
4, 875. (c) Clennan, E. L. Suflur Rep. 1996, 19, 171. (d) Clennan, E.
32, 160. Satyanarayana, P. V. V.; Rao, Y. N.; Rao, N. N. Indian J .
Chem., A 1985, 24A, 34. Baciocchi, E.; Lanzalunga, O.; Marconi, F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 53, 9771. Ganesan, T. K.; Rajagopal, S.;
Bharathy, J . B.; Sheriff, A. I. M. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 21.
Santyanarayana, P. V. V.; Rao, B. N. M.; Ramana, G. V. J . Indian
Chem. Soc. 1989, 66, 198.
(
(
3
(8) Perez, U.; Dunford, H. D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1038,
98.
L. Adv. Oxygenated Processes 1995, 4, 49. (e) Ando, W.; Takada, T. In
Singlet Oxygen; Frimer, A. A., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1985; Vol.
(9) Ramkumar, D.; Sankararaman, S. Synthesis 1993, 1057. Zen,
J . M.; Liou, S. L.; Kumar, A. S.; Hsia, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 577. Bhalerhao, U. T.; Sridhar, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 1413. Somasundaram, N.; Srnivasan, C. J . Photochem. Photobiol.,
A 1998, 115, 169. Baciocchi, E.; Del Giacco, T.; Ferrero, M. I.; Rol, C.;
Sebastiani, G. V. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4015.
(10) (a) Clennan. E. L.; Greer, A. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4793. (b)
Bonesi, S. M.; Albini, A. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4532.
(11) Clennan, E. L.; Zhou, W.; Chan, J . J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9368.
(12) Madhavan, D.; Pitchumani, K. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8391.
3
, p 1.
(4) (a) J ensen, F.; Greer, A.; Clennan, E. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
1
1
20, 4439. Kenzen, F.; Greer, A.; Clennan, E. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
998, 120, 4439. (b) McKee, M. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3963.
(
5) (a) Kacher, M. L.; Foote, C. S. Photochem. Photobiol. 1979, 29,
65. (b) Monroe, B. M. Photochem. Photobiol. 1979, 29, 761.
6) (a) Watanabe, Y.; Kuriki, N.; Ishiguro, K.; Sawaki, Y. J . Am.
7
(
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2677. (b) Ishiguro, K.; Hayashi, M.; Sawaki, Y.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7265.
1
0.1021/jo035679e CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/09/2004
9
28
J . Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 928-935