7.5 ꢀ 10ꢁ4 sꢁ1 for the DNA system and were thus similar to
each other. We also investigated whether the reaction is
catalytic in template by varying the template concentration
at constant probe concentration. The highest turnover
numbers (120 min) were found with 1% template and were
in the range of 6 (Fig. S4 and S5, ESIw). These values are
similar to those found earlier for PNA probes on a DNA
template with the same Staudinger reduction,16 but less than
those reported for PNA probes on DNA templates using acyl
transfer chemistry.9 It is therefore likely that the lifetime of the
aza-ylide intermediate of the Staudinger reduction which
transiently ligates the two probe strands is limiting turnover.
Next we applied this homo-DNA templated chemistry to a
molecular beacon25 format and constructed MB1, in which the
loop part (15 nt) consisted of DNA and the stem part
(7 base-pairs) of homo-DNA (Fig. 4). The 60-end of the
beacon was equipped with TPP and the corresponding probe
MBP1 with the rhodamine azide. In order to avoid unpaired
homo-DNA single strands we added MBP1 as a duplex with
its complement MBI1, reasoning that this reduces stem strand
invasion of MBP1 in the absence of targets and stabilizes the
non-reporting wing by duplex formation.
As can be seen from Fig. 5 target binding efficiently induces
the templated reduction and leads to a fluorescence signal. The
reaction is mismatch sensitive. A transition mutation (C - T)
as well as transversion mutations (C - A and C - G) in the
same position in the center of the loop produces fluorescence
signals that are substantially weaker compared to the matched
target. We find
a match/mismatch signal ratio of 3.5
(t = 20 min) which is slightly better than that of a normal
DNA beacon but slightly inferior to that of a LNA beacon
under similar conditions.26
In conclusion we have demonstrated that homo-DNA
templated chemistry is at least as efficient as natural nucleic
acid templated chemistry. In addition we have developed a
mismatch selective nucleic acid sensor based on a chimaeric
homo-DNA/DNA molecular beacon in which the reporting
domain is decoupled from the sensing domain. With this each
domain can be designed and optimized separately. Moreover,
the bioorthogonality of the reporting domain is expected to
increase fidelity as it does not interact with the nucleic acid
matrix.
Notes and references
1 J. Hunziker, H. J. Roth, M. Bohringer, A. Giger, U. Diederichsen,
¨
M. Gobel, R. Krishnan, B. Jaun, C. Leumann and
¨
A. Eschenmoser, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1993, 76, 259–352.
2 A. Eschenmoser, Science, 1999, 284, 2118–2124.
3 M. Egli, P. S. Pallan, R. Pattanayek, C. J. Wilds, P. Lubini,
G. Minasov, M. Dobler, C. J. Leumann and A. Eschenmoser,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 10847–10856.
4 B. J. Weimann, R. Lohrmann, L. E. Orgel, H. Schneide and
J. E. Sulston, Science, 1968, 161, 387.
5 Z. J. Gartner, B. N. Tse, R. Grubina, J. B. Doyon, T. M. Snyder
and D. R. Liu, Science, 2004, 305, 1601–1605.
6 L. Mannocci, S. Melkko, F. Buller, I. Molnar, J.-P. Gapian-
Bianke
Chem., 2010, 21, 1836–1841.
7 M. F. Jacobsen, E. Clo, A. Mokhir and K. V. Gothelf, ChemMedChem,
2007, 2, 793–799.
´
, C. E. Dumelin, J. Scheuermann and D. Neri, Bioconjugate
´
8 A. P. Silverman and E. T. Kool, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3775–3789.
9 T. N. Grossmann and O. Seitz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128,
15596–15597.
10 R. M. Franzini and E. T. Kool, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
16021–16023.
Fig. 4 Schematic layout of the homo-DNA/DNA beacon. In the
absence of target the beacon is in its closed form and templated
chemistry is suppressed. Upon target binding the small duplex containing
the probe MBP1 and MBI1 disproportionates and binds to both stem
domains of the beacon, enabling the Staudinger reaction.
11 G. P. Miller, A. P. Silverman and E. T. Kool, Bioorg. Med. Chem.,
2008, 16, 56–64.
12 T. N. Grossmann and O. Seitz, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 6723–6730.
13 J. Cai, X. Li, X. Yue and J. S. Taylor, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,
126, 16324–16325.
14 R. M. Franzini and E. T. Kool, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2935–2938.
15 R. M. Franzini and E. T. Kool, ChemBioChem, 2008, 9, 2981–2988.
16 Z. L. Pianowski and N. Winssinger, Chem. Commun., 2007, 3820–3822.
17 Z. Pianowski, K. Gorska, L. Oswald, C. A. Merten and
N. Winssinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6492–6497.
18 A. Shibata, H. Abe, M. Ito, Y. Kondo, S. Shimizu, K. Aikawa and
Y. Ito, Chem. Commun., 2009, 6586–6588.
19 K. Furukawa, H. Abe, J. Wang, M. Uda, H. Koshino, S. Tsuneda
and Y. Ito, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 671–677.
20 H. Abe, J. Wang, K. Furukawa, K. Oki, M. Uda, S. Tsuneda and
Y. Ito, Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19, 1219–1226.
21 T. N. Grossmann, A. Strohbach and O. Seitz, ChemBioChem,
2008, 9, 2185–2192.
22 H. Abe and E. T. Kool, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 13980–13986.
23 C. Dose, S. Ficht and O. Seitz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45,
5369–5373.
24 C. Crey-Desbiolles, D. R. Ahn and C. J. Leumann, Nucleic Acids
Res., 2005, 33, e77.
25 S. Tyagi and F. R. Kramer, Nat. Biotechnol., 1996, 14, 303–308.
26 L. Wang, C. J. Yang, C. D. Medley, S. A. Benner and W. Tan,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15664–15665.
Fig. 5 Fluorescence signal development for the templated reaction of
the molecular beacon MB1 with the probe MBP1 in the presence of
matched and mismatched DNA targets. Experiments were performed
at 35 1C in buffer 1 (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris, 3.5 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0)
with MBP1 (200 nM), MB1 (200 nM), MBI1 (200 nM) and the
indicated targets (1.3 mM).
c
7496 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7494–7496
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011