120
M.G. Egusquiza et al. / Catalysis Communications 26 (2012) 117–121
Table 4
Table 5
Conversion and selectivity to epoxide according to L/H2O2/PWCu ratio.
Conversion and selectivity of the PWCu and PWCu/γ-Al2O3 phase at 7 h of reaction
time.
L/H2O2/PWCu
Conv.a
(% in 40 h)
Conv. (% ) (dilution)
*
Selec. Eb
(% in 40 h)
Catalysts
Conversion of
limonene (%)
Conversion
of H2O2
Selectivity to
epoxide (%)
Efficiency
of H2O2
1000/2000/1
2500/5000/1
5000/10,000/1
96.1
36.2
21.6
96.08 (1)c =96.1
*
95.6
96.6
94.1
36.16 (2.5)c =90.4
*
PWCu with PTAa
PWCu–γ-Al2O3
without PTAb
12.24
17.63
–
97.71
59.84
60.8
–
21.59 (5)c =107.9
*
91.6
68.4
a
CVb7%.
CVb5%.
b
a
Molar ratio: L/H2O2/catalyst (1000/2000/1) at 2 °C.
Molar ratio: L/H2O2 (4/1), 76 mg of catalyst at 70 °C.
c
b
Dilution factor.
environmental point of view since a non toxic solvent, replacing the
chlorinated solvents, was used in this system.
In response to increased activity and selectivity towards
epoxilimonene obtained with PWCu, we selected this catalyst to
study the influence of the molar ratio of L/H2O2/catalyst on the
course of oxidation reaction while the other parameters were
unchanged. These results are presented in Table 4.
4. Conclusions
Fig. 4 shows the conversion as a function of time for each of the
L/H2O2/catalyst under study.
Among the heteropolytungstates, PWM with M(II)=Mn, Co, Cu
and Zn, only the phase with Cu(II) and its precursor phase Δ-PW9
showed catalytic activity in the epoxidation to limonene using H2O2
under biphasic conditions. The PWCu phase has proved to be the
most active catalyst for the oxidation of limonene. Thus, these results
give evidence about its chemical properties and different structural
characteristics related to the presence of Cu(II). Among these features
the following can be mentioned: a) the Jahn–Teller effect of Cu(II)
which allows a higher exposition of the P\O group; and b) the high
redox capacity of Cu(II) in an oxidative process.
The redox process induces the electronic transference which con-
tributes to the oxygen addition on the C_C, leading to the formation
of the limonene epoxide.
The different physico-chemical analyses conducted both on the pure
phase and on the alumina supported phase indicate that the Cu/W ratio
remains similar to the theoretical ratio according to the chemical com-
position of the pure phase. Also, the Raman and XPS spectroscopic tech-
niques show the preservation of the structure on the surface.
The best catalytic activity using PWCu phase as catalyst was ob-
served by the molar ratio L/H2O2/cat=1000/2000/1.
The catalytic evaluation of the ã-Al2O3 supported PWCu system in-
dicated that the reaction conducted in the absence of PTA showed a
higher conversion than the reaction under biphasic conditions. How-
ever, the selectivity to epoxilimonene obtained with PWCu/Al2O3
was lower than PWCu under biphasic system due to the hydrolysis
reaction of the oxirane ring. Although selectivity to epoxilimonene
obtained with the supported catalyst has been low, the results are en-
couraging since the heterogeneous system avoids the use of chlori-
nated solvents and the previous steps to the synthesis are easier.
Therefore, considering the high conversion of limonene achieved, fur-
ther research should be conducted to reduce the by-products.
As it can be seen, the limonene conversion decreased by increasing
the molar ratio L/H2O2/catalyst achieving a value close to 20 mol%.
However, when the conversion values were calculated considering
the dilution factor of the catalyst corresponding to the limonene con-
centration, equivalent conversions were obtained. These results indi-
cated the existence of a linear relationship between activity and
catalyst concentration. This fact demonstrated a “molecular reaction”
which is typical of a homogeneous conventional catalyst in which
the association of its molecular or ionic units in organic phase could
not take place. Regarding the product selectivity, the epoxilimonene
was obtained as major product in all the cases. Therefore, a molar
ratio L/H2O2/cat=1000/2000/1 appeared as the optimum value.
On the other hand, the catalytic activity of the phase PWCu
supported on alumina was evaluated taking into account the impor-
tance of using a heterogeneous catalyst for the environment. In addi-
tion, another important point is the desirable replacement of the
chlorate solvents with an environmentally friendly solvent such as
acetonitrile. Table 5 and Fig. 5 show comparative conversions of the
catalytic evaluation in the limonene epoxidation for the two systems
under study after a reaction time of 7 h. The results indicated that the
selectivity to epoxilimonene for the bulk catalyst using PTA was much
higher due to the fact that the biphasic system prevented the hydro-
lysis of the oxirane ring. However, in the heterogeneous system
(supported catalyst) a higher conversion of limonene was obtained.
Then, the selectivity to epoxilimonene decreased with the occurrence
of by‐products, such as carvone (C), carveol (Car), diepoxide (not in
the scheme) and glycol (D).
In all cases the mass balance was close to values which fell within
the error of the method.
Finally, although work must continue to improve selectivity in the
heterogeneous system, the results obtained are encouraging from the
100
80
60
40
PWCu/γ -Al2O3
20
PWCu
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
t (hs)
Fig. 4. Oxidation of limonene as a function of time for the different molar ratio L/H2O2/PWCu.
Fig. 5. Limonene conversion as a function of time catalyzed by PWCu and PWCu/γ-Al2O3.