1104
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1104-1105
Asymmetric Molybdenum-Catalyzed Alkylations
Initial experiments focused on the use of tungsten with chiral
ligands 1, 2, and 3. The catalyst was generated by stirring a
8
9
10
Barry M. Trost* and Iwao Hachiya
Department of Chemistry, Stanford UniVersity
Stanford, California 94305-5080
ReceiVed September 19, 1997
Interest in molybdenum-1,2 and tungsten-catalyzed reactions
of allyl substrates with nucleophiles stemmed from the issue of
regioselectivity. Most notably, with aryl-substituted allyl systems,
palladium-catalyzed reactions normally provide products from
attack at the less substituted terminus, even with chiral ligands
3
(
eq 1, path a).4 On the other hand, molybdenum and tungsten
2 5 3 3
1:1.5 mixture of (C H CN) W(CO) :ligand in THF at 60 °C. The
test reaction employed the cinnamate 4 (Ar ) Ph) with dimethyl
catalysts favor attack at the more substituted terminus (eq 1, path
b). The value of products of the latter type as building blocks
makes a highly regio- and enantioselective method desirable. A
recent report utilizing tungsten with phosphinooxazoline ligands
with only dimethyl malonate as the pronucleophile proved
promising, whereas the isostructural molybdenum complex was
described as “not useful as a catalyst”.5 Early studies in our
laboratories utilizing a variety of chiral nitrogen-based ligands
for molybdenum failed to give any appreciable asymmetric
induction.6 In both cases, ligation of the octahedral complexes
involves structures such as I. Creating helical-like chiral
sodiomalonate (5a) in THF at reflux. With ligands 1a, 1b, and
2, the reaction either failed or generated only trace amounts of
products. These results mirror our earlier results which suggested
that phosphines deactivated the tungsten catalyst compared to
pyridines.3 On the other hand, the Pfaltz5 ligand system involves
both a phosphine and an imine. The first sign of some success
came in the use of the nitrogen ligand 3 whereby, with 5 mol %
3
of catalyst, a low yield of a 19:1 ratio of 6 :7 (Ar ) Ph, R ) H),
where 6 had an enantiomeric excess (ee) of 98% was observed.
Increasing the catalyst to 15 mol % increased the yield to 55%
and the 6:7 ratio to 49:1 with 6 still having 98% ee.
,7
In contrast to the results of Pfaltz, switching to the molybdenum
system proved better. As summarized in Table 1 (entry 1),
repeating the above but replacing the tungsten complex by (C
CN) Mo(CO) gave an 88% yield of a 97:3 ratio of 6:7 (Ar )
2 5
H -
3
3
Ph, R ) H) with 6 having an ee of 99%. Lowering the
temperature to room temperature (entry 2) still provided a good
yield and somewhat improved regioselectivity while maintaining
a high ee.
A key question relates to the mechanism of the asymmetric
induction. Since 4 is achiral, the catalyst may differentiate the
enantiotopic faces leading preferentially to π-allylmolybdenum
complex 9 or 10 and then onto product. Alternatively, the two
diastereomeric π-allylmolybdenum complexes 9 and 10 may be
in dynamic equilibrium (eq 3) in which the enantiodifferentiation
complexes represented by II may create a more effective chiral
environment. An alternative might be to bridge in a trans fashion
as in III. We report our recent preliminary observations designed
toward complexes of these latter types that have led to reactions
according to path b of eq 1 with high regioselectivity as well as
enantioselectivity.
(
1) Trost, B. M.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5543; 1987,
09, 1469. Trost, B. M.; Lautens, M. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 4817 and
references therein. Trost, B. M.; Merlic, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
590.
2) For early work on stoichiometric π-allylmolybdenum alkylations, see:
1
9
(
Adams, R. D.; Chodosh, D. F.; Faller, J. W.; Rosan, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
occurs by preferential nucleophilic attack on 9 or 10. Starting
from the chiral substrate 8 (Ar ) Ph) differentiates these two
possibilities. If the first scheme operates, either a kinetic
resolution or racemic product would be observed. In the latter
instance, we should see results similar to those obtained with the
achiral allylic substrate 4. As shown in entries 3 and 4, the results
starting with 8 (Ar ) Ph) mostly mirror those starting from 4
(Ar ) Ph) (entries 1 and 2). While the observed small differences
1
979, 101, 2570. McCleverty, J. A.; Murray, A. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978,
1
49, C29. For more recent work, see: Rubio, A.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 891.
(3) Trost, B. M.; Hung, M.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7757. Trost,
B. M.; Tometzki, G. B.; Hung, M.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2176.
(4) Godleski, S. A. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Semmelhack, M. F., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1991;
Vol. 4, pp 585-662. (b) However, for a recent interesting exception with Pd
catalysis, see: Hayashi, T.; Kawatsura, M.; Uozumi, Y. Chem. Commun. 1997,
5
61.
(
5) Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34,
4
62.
(8) Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992,
31, 228. Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L.; Bingel, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 9327.
(9) Richter, W. Unpublished work in these laboratories.
(10) Chapman, R. L.; Vagg, R. S.; Watton, E. C.; Barnes, D. J. J. Chem.
Eng. Data 1978, 23, 349. Also see: Adolfsson, H.; Moberg, C. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2023.
(
(
6) Merlic, C. A. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1988.
7) For asymmetric alkylations with enantiomerically pure stoichiometric
complexes, see: Faller, J. W.; Chao, K.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
3
893. Faller, J. W.; Chao, K.-H. Organometallics 1984, 3, 927. For an
overview, see: Faller, J. W.; Mazzieri, M. R.; Nguyen, J. T.; Parr, J.;
Tokunaga, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1463.
S0002-7863(97)03298-8 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/23/1998