39
agent to yield after 15–25 min complete reduction of the starting material.10 After classical work-up,
the crudes were examined by TLC and compared in some cases with the crudes resulting from the
corresponding Weinreb amide reductions which were synthesized in parallel. These crudes were found as
pure as the ones obtained from Weinreb amide reductions and with similar yields. They were purified by
silica gel chromatography with eluent systems containing 0.1% pyridine to avoid racemization to measure
their optical purity (Table 1). To check that N-protected α-amino aldehydes were not racemized when
prepared by this method, the synthesis of a reduced dipeptide, e.g. Boc-L-AlaΨ(CH2NH)L-Phe-NH2,
was carried out by condensation of crude Boc-L-Ala-H with H-L-Phe-NH2, as previously described9
1
(Scheme 2). Examination of the H NMR spectrum showed a single signal for the NH, Cα and methyl
protons of the alanine residue corresponding to the (LL) diastereoisomer, supporting the idea that this
method was free of racemization during the preparation of the aldehyde. Moreover, the measured [α]D
of the reduced dipeptide was found identical to that of compounds prepared by various methods.11
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the reduced dipeptide Boc-L-AlaΨ(CH2NH)L-Phe-NH2
In conclusion, this method of preparation of N-protected α-amino aldehyde is comparable with the
Weinreb amide one and provides an interesting alternative. The high cost of N,O-dimethylhydroxamate
hydrochloride made this new approach attractive since morpholine amides could be easily prepared at
low cost. We have also shown the reduction condition compatibility with most of the commonly used
N-protecting groups.
References
1. Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 39, 3815–3818.
2. Fehrentz, J. A.; Castro, B. Synthesis 1983, 676–678.
3. Nishizawa, R.; Saino, T. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 510–515.
4. Rich, D. H.; Sun, E. T.; Boparai, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3624–3626.
5. Kurosu, M.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4793–4796.
6. Martin, R.; Romea, P.; Tey, C.; Urpf, F.; Vilarrassa, J. Synlett 1997, 1414–1415.
7. Sengupta, S.; Mondal, S.; Das, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4107–4110.
8. Ho, P. T.; Ngu, K. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2313–2316.
9. Martinez, J.; Bali, J. P.; Rodriguez, M.; Castro, B.; Magous, R.; Laur, J.; Lignon, M. F. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 1874–1879.
10. General method of preparation of the N-Boc or N-Z morpholine amide derivatives: Boc-Ala-OH (945 mg, 5
mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (50 mL), then BOP [(benzotriazol-1-yloxy)tris(dimethylamino)phosphonium
hexafluorophosphate] (2.21 g, 5 mmol) and diisopropylethylamine (DIEA: 1.72 mL, 10 mmol) were added followed by
morpholine (0.478 mL, 5.5 mmol). After 90 min stirring, the mixture was concentrated in vacuo and ethyl acetate was
added. The organic layer was washed with acidic, then basic and neutral aqueous solutions, dried over sodium sulfate
and concentrated in vacuo. The compound obtained as an oil was purified by silica gel flash chromatography. BOP could
be replaced by N-[(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)(dimethylamino)methylene]-N-methylmethanaminium hexafluorophosphate N-
oxide (HBTU) or other phosphonium or uronium salts. Chloroformates were also useful especially in the case of Fmoc-
α-amino acids; DCC/HOBt coupling mixture was found less suitable. In the case of coupling with BOP, HBTU, etc.
on N-Boc or N-Z-amino acids, the tertiary amine (DIEA, NEt3, etc.) could advantageously be replaced by an excess of
morpholine (4 equiv.). General method of preparation of the N-Fmoc morpholine amide derivatives: Fmoc-Ala-OH (3.11
g, 10 mmol) were dissolved in 25 mL DME and placed at −15°C. IBCF (1.31 mL, 10 mmol) and NMM (1.01 mL, 10
mmol) were then added; the formed precipate was eliminated by filtration and morpholine (0.87 mL, 10 mmol) was added
to the solution. After one hour the reaction was complete and treated as previously described. After flash chromatography,
3.4 g of a foam were obtained (yield: 90%). General method of preparation of amino aldehydes: As an example, reduction