1
164
OGAREV et al.
5
HNO + 3HF + 3CH COOH, v = 10 µm/s
3
3
etch
1
HNO + 1HF, v
= 9.125 µm/s
= 1.875 µm/s
= 0.063 µm/s
3
etch
8
0
1HNO + 1HCl, v
3
etch
1Br + 10CH COOH, v
2
3
etch
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Time, s
Fig. 4. Thickness of the layer removed from the NiSb surface as a function of etching time for different etchants.
XRD examination was carried out on a DRON-2
Single crystals were prepared by horizontal Bridg-
diffractometer (CuK radiation, λ = 1.5405 Å, diffrac- man growth in boats made from quartz coated with
α
tion angle from 0° to 55°). The XRD pattern of the pyrolytic carbon, alundum, or graphite.
material (Fig. 1) showed only peaks characteristic of
The best NiSb crystals were grown in a pure hydro-
NiSb. The lattice parameters coincided with those given
gen flow using graphite boats 250–270 mm in length
in the JCPDS PDF.
and 23–25 mm in diameter, which were mounted in a
quartz tube 45–50 mm in diameter. The growth unit
included a 600-mm-long two-zone furnace and a drive
system for translating the furnace along the boat at a
rate of 2–6.5 mm/h. The temperature of the hot zone
was 1200–1220°C. In the second zone, the temperature
profile sloped down with a gradient of 50°C/cm. The
temperature was maintained with an accuracy of
DTA also confirmed that the samples were phase-
pure; the heating curve showed a thermal effect due to
melting at 1136°C, in agreement with earlier results [4].
Mass spectrometry data for NiSb samples
at %
mol %
at %
mol %
±
0.5°ë. One of the NiSb crystals grown under such
Element
sample 1
sample 2
conditions is shown in Fig. 2.
C
0.040
0.0085
0.032
0.0053
0.0023
0.0097
0.013
0.039
0.010
0.0050
0.0026
0.010
The structure of NiSb single crystals was deter-
mined using x-ray intensity data collected on an Enraf-
Nonius CAD-4 automatic four-circle diffractometer
Mg
Al
Si
0.036
(
graphite monochromator, MoKα radiation, λ =
0.042
0.055
0.017
0.7107 Å, θ-scan mode). Absorption correction was
evaluated from transmission curves. All crystallo-
graphic calculations were made using SHELX-93 [6].
The structure was solved by the heavy atom method
and was refined by a full-matrix least squares technique
with anisotropic thermal parameters.
P
0.0005
0.0023
0.010
0.0002
0.0008
0.0045
0.070
0.0004
0.0055
0.0075
0.06
0.0002
0.0020
0.0034
0.0075
0.0003
0.0007
0.0026
0.017
S
K
Ca
Ti
Cr
Mn
Fe
Ni
Co
Cu
Zn
Sb
0.016
0.0005
0.0012
0.0025
0.028
0.0003
0.0008
0.0015
0.018
0.0005
0.0012
0.0042
0.027
The refined lattice parameters of NiSb (hexagonal
symmetry, sp. gr. P6 /mmc, NiAs structure) are a =
3
3
.953 Å and c = 5.141 Å. Figure 3 shows the structure
of NiSb projected along the [010] and [100] directions.
The table presents mass spectrometry data for two
samples cut from a single-crystal NiSb ingot, one from
the first grown portion (sample 1) and the other from
the tail end (sample 2). Note that sample 1 was enriched
in Ni, and sample 2, in Sb as compared to the stoichio-
metric composition. Note also that the effective distri-
bution coefficients of Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, and Mn are less
than unity, and those of C, P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn are
greater than unity.
50.50
32.74
49.95
32.25
0.0015
0.0007
0.0005
49.28
0.0010
0.0005
0.0004
67.19
0.0015
0.0006
0.0004
49.82
0.0009
0.0004
0.0003
67.67
Note: Sample 1 was cut from the first grown portion of the crystal,
and sample 2 was cut from the tail end.
INORGANIC MATERIALS Vol. 41 No. 11 2005