S.K. Mishra, L.C. Pathak / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 465 (2008) 547–555
555
samples. This desintering effect that increased the porosity of
composites with higher amount of TiC content can be due to
combination of several reasons such as solubility of dispersoid
phase to matrix or the vice versa, molar volume change dur-
ing sintering, differential diffusivity of the phases [27]. It has
been found that though the solubility of ZrB2 is less into TiB2
but TiB2 has higher solubility in ZrB2. It has been observed
that when additive has more solubility into matrix phase the
swelling can occur in the product. Also the change in molar vol-
ume during sintering due to some reaction product or the phase
also leads to crack or pores due to stresses. The difference in
the diffusivity of the two phases, segregation of phases can also
lead to fragility and more pores during sintering. Considering all
these, it was concluded that during high temperature sintering
with higher percentages of TiC, formation of TiB2 was observed.
Some TiB2/Ti must have gone into solution with ZrB2, which
has been observed in the SHS process by EDX analysis but no
diffusion of Zr was observed into Ti containing grain. Also the
molar volume of TiC (81.6) when gets converted to TiB2 (25.6)
during sintering at high temperature will lead to pore formation
and swelling. Hence porous mass was obtained for the higher
percentages of TiC addition.
The SEM microstructures of the fractured surfaces of sin-
tered samples made from carbothermic and commercial powder
is shown in Fig. 13. From the microstructures, it was apparent
that very small amount of TiC was helping in sintering and the
increase of TiC content led to segregation, porosity and less den-
sification. The larger grain growth in pockets was also observed
during sintering when segregation are there and normal grain
growthtookplacesimilartothenormalsinteringofZrB2 without
any additive.
geneous material in all the cases of ZrB2 prepared by different
routes. Formation of TiB2 and TiB phase was observed for 10,
20 and 30 wt.% of TiC added samples. The porous structure
was observed due to complex sintering and segregation during
sintering.
Hence on the basis of the above studies, it is concluded that
a very fine grained structure of the ZrB2–C composite could be
obtained with higher density by addition of 2–4% of C. Higher
percentages of C are not beneficial to enhance the property in
terms of sintering. TiC is not a good addition for sintering of
ZrB2, but the C additions in very small percentage (3–4 wt.%)
can enhance the density drastically along with the control of
grain growth. Composites prepared from SHS made ZrB2 pow-
der proved to give the most homogeneous product.
References
[1] K. Upadhya, J. Yang, W. Hoffman, Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (12) (1997)
51.
[2] A. Makino, C.K. Low, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (3) (1994) 778.
[3] L.J. Kecskes, T. Kottke, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (5) (1990) 1274.
[4] M. Duabdesselam, Z.A. Munir, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 1799.
[5] H.R. Baumgartner, A. Steiger, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 (1984) 207.
[6] T. Watanbe, S. Kouno, Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc. 61 (1982) 970.
[7] G. Suskin, G. Chepovetsky, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 5 (1996) 396.
[8] S. Baik, P.F. Becher, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70 (1987) 527.
[9] C.B. Finch, P.F. Becher, P. Angelini, S. Baik, C.E. Bamberger, Adv. Ceram.
Mater. 1 (1986) 50.
[10] Z.A. Munir, Particul. Mater. 1 (1993) 41.
[11] M. Einarsud, E. Hagen, G. Petersen, T. Granede, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80
(12) (1997) 3013.
[12] K.B. Shim, M.J. Edirisinghe, B. Ralph, Brit. Ceram. Trans. 95 (1996) 15.
[13] E.S. Kang, C. Kim, J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990) 580.
[14] R. Gonzalez, R. Barandika, M.G. Ona, D. Sanchez, J.M. Villellas, A. Valea,
A. Castro, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 216 (1996) 185.
[15] P. Angelini, P.F. Becher, J. Bentely, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 24 (1984)
299.
4. Conclusions
[16] S.A. Shavab, F.E. Egorov, Sov. Powder Met. 22 (1983) 261.
[17] E. Kang, C. Jang, C.H. Lee, C. Hong, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1989)
1868.
[18] R. Tomoshige, A. Muryama, T. Matsushita, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (5)
(1997) 761.
[19] Y.M. Cheng, A.M. Gadalla, Mater. Manufact. Process. 11 (4) (1996) 575.
[20] S. Torizukia, K. Sato, H. Nishio, T. Kishi, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995)
1606.
[21] J. Park, Y. Koh, H. Kim, C. Hong, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82 (1999) 3937.
[22] A.G. Merzhanov, I.P. Borovinskaya, Combust. Sci. Technol. 10 (1975) 195.
[23] Z.A. Munir, Metall. Trans. A 23A (1992) 7.
[24] S.K. Mishra, S. Das, L.C. Pathak, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 364 (2004) 249.
[25] S.K. Mishra, S. Das, S.K. Das, P. Ramachandrarao, J. Mater. Res. 15 (11)
(2000) 2499.
[26] S.K. Mishra(Pathak), S. Das, R.P. Goel, P. Ramachandrarao, J. Mater. Sci.
16 (1997) 965.
The effect of different amounts of TiC and C presence in the
ZrB2 matrix prepared by three different methods namely SHS,
carbothermic and commercial powder was studied. The density
was found to increase with the addition of C only upto 5 wt.%.
Further increase in C content led to decrease in densification due
to slow mass transport between the ZrB2 grains and C does not
take part in the sintering and stays at the grain-boundary. Out
of all the three methods, the SHS process was best in terms of
homogeneity of the sample the density could be increased from
87 to 94% of the theoretical density. It is believed that the smaller
amount of carbon acted to reduce the surface oxygen of borides
and led to enhancement of densification. In the case of TiC addi-
tion, it was observed that though there is increase in density with
5 wt.% TiC addition but the microstructure is not homogeneous.
Further increase of TiC content leads to porous and inhomo-
[27] R.M. German, Sintering Theory & Practice, vol. 5, JWilly & Sons Publ
ch., 1996, p. 179.