C. Rapp et al.
Journal of Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
2.4. Determination of catalyst activity and effect of HBC on the catalyst
or adsorbed to plastics (tubes, tips). Generally, higher recoveries were
obtained after harsh reaction conditions, i.e. higher substrate concen-
trations and longer reaction times (Leis et al., 2017). CD concentrations
played a minor role in analyte recovery.
2.4.1. Catalyst activity measured prior to bioreductions
Total enzyme activities of the whole biomass (extracellular and intra-
cellular enzymes). The suspension was directly subjected to cell lysis and
protein extraction with B-PER© cell lysis reagent. Enzyme activities
were assayed subsequently to the protein extraction.
3. Results and discussion
Enzyme activities of the supernatant (extracellular enzymes). The
rehydrated biomass was centrifuged and the activities of xylose reduc-
tase and formate dehydrogenase that had leaked out of the cells were
determined in the supernatant.
3.1. Cyclodextrin selection
The initial intention of the present study was to protect the catalyst in
the reaction mixture by complexing hydrophobic substrate and product.
Therefore, we searched for CDs capable of hosting o-chlor-
oacetophenone and (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethanol. The main determi-
nant for the formation of a tight S∙CD complex is the cavity size of the
Spectrophotometric determination of enzyme activities. Reductase and
dehydrogenase activities were assayed by monitoring the reduction or
oxidation of NAD(H) at 340 nm (Beckman Coulter DU 800® spectro-
photometer). Rates of 0.05ꢀ 0.10 ΔA/min were measured over a time
cyclodextrin. In most applications, CDs with 6, 7 or 8
α
-(1,4) linked D-
period of 5 min. 1
μ
mol of NADH formed or consumed per minute equals
glucopyranose units, referred to as -, β- or γ-CDs, are used. α
α
-CD is able
one unit of enzyme activity. The assay for CtXR wild-type contained
to complex low molecular weight molecules or aliphatic compounds.
β-CD accommodates aromatics and heterocycles and is mostly used to
complex drugs, flavors, cosmetic ingredients and pesticides. Main
drawback of β-CD is its low water-solubility (18 g/L) caused by H-bond
aided self-aggregation in aqueous solution. Derivatization of the 2-, 3-,
and 6-OH groups disturbs crystallization and leads to amorphous
structures favoring gel-formation over precipitation. Etherification of
the glucose C2-OH groups with 2-hydroxypropyl groups increased the
solubility of β-CD to ~45 % (w/v) (Caligur, 2008; Szejtli, 2004). γ-CD
can accommodate even larger molecules. However, γ-CD has weaker
complex-forming ability than β-CDs (Del Valle, 2004). We tested
2-hydroxypropyl β-CD (abbreviated HBC), unmodified β-CD and γ-CD as
additives for bioreductions of 300 mM o-chloroacetophenone. The
addition of substrate to an aqueous solution of 75 mM HBC resulted in a
visible increase in apparent solubility (Stot) of o-chloroacetophenone.
Loading of 4 gCDW/L lyophilized and rehydrated XR_wild-type cells to
mixtures of HBC and 300 mM substrate yielded 89 % product (Fig. 1A).
Addition of substrate to solutions of 75 mM β-CD or γ-CD led to visible
precipitation. Conversions obtained with 4 gCDW/L cells and 300 mM
substrate in the presence of β-CD or γ-CD were 10 and 9 %, respectively,
similar to reaction mixtures without CDs (data with β-CD or γ-CD not
shown). Therefore, we focused on complex-formation of o-chlor-
oacetophenone and (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethanol with HBC.
700 mM D-xylose and 300 μM NADH; that for CbFDH contained 200 mM
sodium formate and 2 mM NAD+. Assays were performed in 100 mM
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.2) and started by adding NADH or
NAD + . Non-specific background oxidation/reduction was considered
by measuring blank activities.
2.4.2. Effect of HBC on the catalyst (whole biomass as suspended and
rehydrated)
Rehydrated cells (40 mg in 500 μL) were added to 2-mL Eppendorf
tubes containing pre-dissolved HBC (0, 38, 75, 150, 310 mM) and were
filled up to 1 mL (potassium phosphate buffer, 100 mM, pH 6.2). The
mixtures were placed on an end-over-end rotator (30 rpm). Samples
(10 μL) were taken over time and directly subjected to spectrophoto-
metric determination of enzyme activities.
2.5. Effect of HBC on enzyme stabilities in the presence of heptane
Experiments were performed with CtXR (wild-type) and CbFDH
double-purified from the whole-cell catalyst by affinity chromatog-
raphy. The protocol followed the standard protocol for CtXR purification
using a Red 31 dye ligand column (6 × 2.6 cm, Mayr et al., 2000)
(Supplementary data). The specific activity for CtXR was calculated to
12.4 U/mg, while partially purified FDH was determined to 0.64 U/mg.
Enzymes were stored at ꢀ 20 ◦C. 0.5 mL of heptane was added to 2-mL
Eppendorf tubes containing CtXR (0.1 mg/mL) or CbFDH (0.1 mg/mL)
and HBC (0, 38, 75, 150, 310 mM) in potassium phosphate buffer
(100 mM, pH 6.2). Samples were placed on an end-over-end rotator at
30 rpm and room temperature for 24 h. Enzyme activities were
measured over time. All samples were prepared in triplicates.
3.2. Complex characterization
Formation of host∙guest complexes leads to an apparent solubility
(Stot) increase of the hydrophobic guest molecule. We observed linear
increases in Stot for o-chloroacetophenone and (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)
ethanol at stepwise elevated HBC concentrations (Fig. 2). It has been
previously shown that slopes with k ≤ 1 indicate 1:1 complexes, slopes
with k > 1 imply 2:1 complexes, respectively. In the latter case, two
guest molecules bind to one cyclodextrin molecule (Del Valle, 2004;
Loftsson et al., 2004). The obtained slope of k 0.92 for o-chlor-
oacetophenone suggested hence a 1:1 complex, while a slope of k 1.29
for (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethanol a 2:1 complex. Intersects reflect the
intrinsic solubilities of guest molecules (S0), which were 5.8 mM for
o-chloroacetophenone and 19.0 mM for (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethanol.
Binding constants (K[S∙CD]) can be calculated by rearranging the
chemical equilibrium for S∙CD formation where solely the slope (k) and
the intrinsic solubility are needed for determination (equs. 1, 2; Del
Valle, 2004). For o-chloroacetophenone K[S∙CD] was calculated to
2.6. HPLC analysis
Subsequent to the reaction, mixtures were vortexed vigorously. Ali-
quots (100–500 μL) were taken, diluted stepwise in 7:3 ethanol/dH2O
and vortexed. Alternatively, the work up was performed by transferring
the whole reaction mixture (1 mL) into 15 mL Sarstedt tubes followed
by addition of 4 mL isopropanol. The mixture was vortexed and
centrifuged for 10 min, 25 ◦C and 3220 g. The resulting supernatant was
isolated, syringe-filtered and properly diluted using isopropanol.
Quantification of o-chloroacetophenone, (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)
ethanol) and (R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethanol) was accomplished by chi-
2.0 mMꢀ 1
, while K[S∙CD] for (S)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)ethanol equals
¨
ral HPLC as described previously (Schmolzer et al., 2012). Conversions
5.0 mMꢀ 1. The higher the constants are, the more effective complexa-
tion is.
were calculated as Eq. (3):
[Product]
Conversion =
(3)
[Product] + [Substrate]
3.3. Bioreductions of 300 mM o-chloroacetophenone
Total recoveries of substrate and product in small-scale bio-
reductions were between 66 and 99 %. Analyte loss suggested that parts
of hydrophobic substrates and products remained in the cell sludge and/
3.3.1. Bioreductions using the whole biomass as catalyst
Previously, 300 mM o-chloroacetophenone represented the highest
3