968
Y. Li et al. / Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 60 (1999) 965–968
Fig. 4. UV-Vis absorption spectra of HgO–en and Hg(NO3)2–en
solutions; (a) HgO–en, (b) Hg(NO3)2–en.
Fig. 5. UV-Vis absorption spectra of S–en solutions.
dark-green and became colorless transparent after 6 h, while
the Se–en solution showed dark-red color at first, and then
brown transparent after 6 h, and golden transparent after 8 h.
Though the Te–en solution became greyish-white and
remained turbid even after 10 h, we were sure that ethyle-
nediamine did have an important effect in the nucleation of
the very stable HgTe. To enhance the understanding of the
reaction mechanism proposed before, we recorded absorp-
tion spectra of some of these solutions.
studies are needed to investigate the solubilization process
of the chalcogene in ethylenediamine. This conversion
method is very convenient to be carried out as it is less
toxic, low-temperature, fast and easily controlled. This
route is expected to be applicable to fabricate other semi-
conductor nanoparticles and nano-semiconductor films.
Ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy were collected with a
Shimadzu UV-visible Recording spectrophotometer (UV-
240) at room temperature. In Fig. 4, we see that the absorp-
tion spectra of HgO–en and Hg(NO3)2–en solutions almost
have the same shape – both having a sharp peak at 258 nm.
This should be the contribution of the mercuric complex,
[Hg(en)2]2ϩ. Fig. 5 is the absorption spectra of S–en solu-
tion after 10 h. The absorption band located at ca. 260 nm
might result from the depicted polysulfide imido species (*)
[12]. The absorption shoulder at ca. 300 nm refers to the
active sulfur species [12] which is related to the final forma-
tion of HgS.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Prof. Zhou Guien and Ji
Mingrong for valuable assistance with the XRD and XPS
analysis. This work is supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China and the National Nanometer
Materials Climbing Program.
References
[1] C.B. Murray, D.J. Norris, M.G. Bawendi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
115 (1993) 8706.
[2] S.M. Stuczynski, Brennan. J.G., Steigerwald, M.L, Inorg.
Chem. 28 (1989) 4431.
[3] M. Froment, H. Cachet, H. Essaaidi, G. Maurin, R. Cortes,
Pure and Appl. Chem. 69 (1) (1997) 77.
[4] K. Sooklal, B.S. Cullum, S.M. Angel, C.J. Murphy, J. Phys.
Chem. 100 (1996) 4551.
[5] T. Ohmiya, Y. Suge, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 9 (1970) 840.
[6] I.K. Taimni, Anal. Chim. Acta. 12 (1955) 519.
[7] M.L. Steigerwald, C.R. Sprinkle, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109
(1987) 7200.
[8] S.M. Kulify, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 25 (1963) 75.
[9] N.N. Greenwood, E.A. Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements,
Pergamon, Oxford, 1990.
[10] G. Henshaw, I.P. Parkin, G.A. Shaw, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton
Trans. (1997) 231.
[11] M. Rozman, M. Drofenik, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78 (1995) 2449.
[12] P. Dubois, J.P. Lelieur, G. Lepoutre, Inorg. Chem. 28 (1989)
195.
From this discussion on the formation of nanocrystalline
HgE, we could see that ethylenediamine had a crucial effect
almost in whole reaction process. We know that the solubi-
lity product constants (pKsp) of the HgO, HgS and HgSe are
about 25.4, 52.4 and 59.8, respectively, (the pKsp of HgTe
should also be very large) while the stability constant
(log b2) of [Hg(en)2]2ϩ is about 23.3. In ethylenediamine
solution, the conversion from HgO to [Hg(en)2]2ϩ would
take place, and instantly, the conversion from [Hg(en)2]2ϩ
to HgE took place in the presence of newly-produced E2Ϫ
,
(also yielded by ethylenediamine) as HgE was more stable.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, an oxide direct-conversion route for the
formation of nanocrystalline HgS, HgSe and HgTe at
room temperature in ethylenediamine is presented. Solvent
ethylenediamine is found to have a very important role in
the electron-transfer process of the whole reaction. Further
[13] F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 3,
John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1972.