-
oylsilane with CN /18-crown-6 in the presence of MeI can
min, R-methylated cyanohydrins 13, products formed via the
tandem sequence (9 f 10 f 11 f 12), were obtained in
82% and 84%, respectively (Table 1).
undergo γ-alkylation without O-methylation and with the
intention of ultimately extending the reaction to an asym-
metric reaction by using homochiral epoxides.
Although base-promoted isomerization of epoxides to
allylic alcohols has been well documented,4 the only
examples, to the best of our knowledge, of a tandem sequence
involving a ring opening of expoxide followed by Brook
rearrangement are two examples by Gonz a´ lez-Nogai and co-
Table 1
5
workers, who succeeded in the generation of enol silyl ethers
via cleavage of R,â-epoxysilanes with heteroatom nucleo-
philes. In this letter, we wish to report the results of our
preliminary experiments on the tandem process.
We focused on O-silyl cyanohydrins of R,â-epoxyalde-
6
hydes 8 bearing a nitrile group as the electron-withdrawing
1
3, yield (%) (E/Z)
7
group, because 8 can be readily obtained from the corre-
RX
from 8a
from 8b
sponding aldehyde 7 and can provide functionalities useful
for further synthetic elaboration. Epoxysilanes 8a and 8b
were obtained as a diastereomeric mixture by the reaction
of TBSCN with epoxyaldehyde 7, which was derived from
-(1-ethoxyethoxy)propyne via the sequence shown in
Scheme 2. The relative stereochemistry in 8a and 8b was
determined on the basis of X-ray analysis of 8b.
Mel
Etl
i-Prl
82 (2.5)
76 (2.9)
58 (2.8)a
86 (2.7)
83 (3.4)
84 (22.0)
74 (28.0)
74 (31.0)
98 (47.0)
87 (40.0)
PhCH2Br
CH2dCHCH2Br
1f
3
8
a
1
2% yield of 13 (R ) H) was obtained.
Methylation products of intermediates 9 or 10 were not
detected. Similar results were obtained for other alkylating
agents (Table 1). Although almost the same yields were
obtained from 8a and 8b, the E/Z ratios of the two isomers
were markedly different, suggesting that the reactions from
Scheme 2
8a and 8b do not share common intermediates in their major
reaction pathways. Also, the addition of an alkylating agent
after treatment with a base did not markedly affect the yield
or E/Z ratio.
Next, we examined the effectiveness of other amide bases
to improve the E/Z-selectivity. While the use of lithium
hexamethyldisilazide (LHMDS, 1.0 M in THF) resulted in
lower yields but improvement in E/Z ratios with 8a,
comparable yields of 13 were obtained with potassium
hexamethyldisilazide (KHMDS, 0.5 M in toluene). It is
notable that the increased formation of the Z-derivative with
When 8a and 8b were treated with LDA (1.05 equiv) in
THF at -80 °C in the presence of MeI (1.2 equiv) for 5
8
a was observed in the case of the latter base. The best
(
2) For reviews on the Brook rearrangement, see: (a) Brook, M. A.
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry; John Wiley
Sons: New York, 2000. (b) Brook, A. G.; Bassindale, A. R. In
results, in terms of yield and E/Z-selectivity, were obtained
with sodium hexamethyldisilazide (NHMDS, THF solution),
allowing the formation of (E)-13 in excellent yields. It is
particularly noteworthy that the alkylation proceeds rapidly
under much milder conditions than those for O-trimethylsilyl
&
Rearrangements in Ground and Excited States; de Mayo, P., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1980; pp 149-221. (c) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res.
1
974, 7, 77-84. For the use of the Brook rearrangement in tandem bond
formation strategies, see: (d) Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065-
2
6
1
084. Also see: (e) Ricci, A.; Degl’Innocenti, A. Synthesis 1989, 647-
60. (f) Bulman Page, P. C.; Klair, S. S.; Rosenthal, S. Chem. Soc. ReV.
990, 19, 147-195. (g) Qi, H.; Curran, D. P. In ComprehensiVe Organic
9
cyanohydrins of R,â-unsaturated aldehydes.
Functional Group Transformations; Katritzky, A. R., Meth-Cohn, O., Rees,
C. W., Moody, C. J., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1995; pp 409-431. (h)
Cirillo, P. F.; Panek, J. S. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1992, 24, 553-582. (i)
Patrocinio, A. F.; Moran, P. J. S. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12, 7-31.
(5) (a) Cuadrado, P.; Gonz a´ lez-Nogai, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 1111-1114. (b) Cuadrado, P.; Gonz a´ lez-Nogai, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 8117-8120.
(6) For alkylation of O-silyl cyanohydrins, see: (a) Arseniyadis, S.; Kyler,
K. S.; Watt, D. S. Org. React. 1984, 31, 1-364. (b) Albright, J. D.
Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 3207-3233.
(7) For a base-promoted ring opening of functionlized epoxides, see:
(epoxy nitriles) (a) Fleming, F. F.; Wang, Q.; Steward, O. W. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 2171-2174. (epoxy amides) (b) Brooks, P. B. Marson, C. M.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 9613-9622. (epoxy esters) (c) Mohr, P.; R o¨ sslein,
L.; Tamm, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2513-2516. (d) Cory, R. M.
Ritchie, B. M.; Shrier, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6789-6792.
(8) For preparation of trimethylsilyl derivatives of 7 (R ) Me), see:
Urabe, H.; Matsuka, T.; Sato F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4179-4182.
(3) For reviews on the homoenolates equivalents, see: (a) Ahlbracht,
H.; Beyer, U. Synthesis 1999, 365-390. (b) Kuwajima, I.; Nakamura, E.
Top. Curr. Chem. 1990, 155, 1. (c) Hoppe, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
984, 23, 932-948. (d) Werstiuk, N. H. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 205-268.
e) Werstiuk, N. H. In Umpoled Synthons; Hase, T. A., Ed.; John Wiley &
1
(
Sons: New York, 1987; p 173. Also see: (f) Debal, A.; Cuvigny, T.;
Larchev eˆ que, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 3187-3190.
(4) For reviews on base-promoted isomerization of epoxides, see: (a)
Crandall, J. K.; Apparu, M. Org. React. 1983, 29, 345-443. (b) Satoh, T.
Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 3303-3325.
1512
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 9, 2002