186
K. Imura et al. / Chemical Physics 301 (2004) 183–187
Table 1
The experimental dipole moments of the metal–benzene half-sandwich
complexes
M
lexp :=D
Ti
V
2.4 ± 0.3
1.0 ± 0.3
<0.4
Co
Ni
<0.6
kV were found to be ꢁ7% for both Co–C H and Ni–
6
6
C H . For these complexes, both experimentally
6
6
observed enhancement and transmission efficiency cal-
culated by the simulation were compared with the ones
for Ti–C6H6, and we estimated these dipole moments.
The results are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 3. The schematic orbital interaction diagram of a half-sandwich
type complex of transition metal with benzene. The electronic config-
uration of the low spin state of Ti–C6H6 complex is shown as an
example.
It is noticed here that the complexes may be formed
different configuration as asymmetric structure in the
molecular beam. Stark effect for only slightly asym-
metric structure, which possibly generated in the beam
due to for example, Jahn–Teller distortion and other
electron correlations, can be described by quasi-first
order Stark effect. Thus, it leads to only minor cor-
rection. On the other hand, beam deflection from
highly asymmetric complexes can not be detected in
the present set-up. It should only generate small de-
flection such as two orders of magnitude smaller
compared with the corresponding symmetric complex
with a same dipole moment, since asymmetric com-
plexes would be deflected only by the second order
Stark effect.
to donate the electron into the Lb orbital. It is easily
1
recognized that electrons of the M–C H complex of
6
6
ꢂ
early transition metal do not have to occupy e anti-
1
bonding orbital in the electronic ground state. On the
other hand, electrons of corresponding complexes of late
ꢂ
transition metals have to occupy e even in the electronic
ground state.
1
For the M–C H complex, Le fi de donation as
6
6
1
1
well as de fi Le back-donation play a central role to
2
2
stabilize the complex. For the early transition metal
complexes, both Le fi de and de fi Le orbital inter-
1
1
2
2
actions contribute, but only de fi Le back-donation is
2
2
expected to stabilize the late transition metal complexes,
ꢂ
It is generally expected that a molecule in the con-
densed phase are stabilized by surrounding solvent and
it stays in electronic ground state. Thus we may expect
that the M–C H complexes formed under the experi-
on the other hand. Since the e orbital is already occu-
pied by electrons of the late transition metal, the do-
1
nation from Le MO is not likely. It should be also
1
6
6
mention that the 3d orbital energy of the investigated
metals increases from Ti to Ni. Therefore, the 3d–Le2
orbital interaction between metal and benzene becomes
weak from Ti to Ni. This should be the main reason that
the dipole moments of the complexes for the early
transition metals are larger than the ones for the late
transition metal complexes. Weak interaction for the
late transition metals would distort their structure of
symmetric top, and thus this small enhancement of the
focusing curve as well as the small dipole moment were
observed in the experiment.
mental conditions as described in the previous section
would be relaxed in the electronic ground state, namely
complexes generated in the reaction channel are easily
de-excited by collisions with He carrier gas.
Fig. 3 shows the orbital interaction diagram of rep-
resentative M–C6H6 complex, where M indicates a
transition metal. The 3d degenerated orbitals of the
1
2
metal atom are split into one 3da (dz ), two de (dxz
1
2
2
2
and dyz), and two de (dxy and dx –y ) orbitals when
molecular z axis was defined to be coincide with the C6
axis of benzene [15]. L on the right hand side of the
diagram indicates molecular orbitals of benzene. Thus,
the electrons of the complex tends to occupy the de2
lowest orbitals because this occupation maximizes at-
In order to confirm this structure deformation of the
complexes, we performed the optimization of the in-
vestigated complexes using the B3LYP/6-31G* [16]. It
was found that most of the optimized complexes were
symmetric and similar to the one found previously for
the Al–C H complex. We also found in the present
1
tractive interaction with Le2 orbitals. A 3da atomic
orbital of transition metal does not provide strong in-
6
6
teraction with the La orbital of benzene molecule, for
1
study that the optimized structures were strongly de-
pendent upon the initial starting geometry of the com-
plexes. Thus, it is difficult at this moment to compare the
experimental results with the calculated ones, unless
further improvement of the theoretical treatment is
performed in the future. However, it should be men-
its orbital is directed to the ‘‘hole’’ at the center of
benzene and therefore this only gives negligibly small
interaction with the La1 orbital. As a result, the 3da1
orbital remains as the 3da1 non-bonding orbital in M–
C6H6. Due to symmetry requirement, it is not possible