2
NoVel C -Symmetric Planar Chiral Diphosphine Ligands
of novel ruthenocenediphosphine ligands 4 and their application
to Pd-catalyzed asymmetric allylic substitutions, by comparing
with their ferrocene analogues 1.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of Ester Amide (4). Ligands 4 can be easily
6
c
prepared from 5 by the transformation of the oxazoline
moieties in the molecule by the method reported (Scheme 1).
FIGURE 1. Structure of 1 and 4 and their complexation with
palladium.
4e
Thus, treatment of 5 with trifluoroacetic acid in aqueous THF
caused ring-opening of the oxazoline moiety to give an unstable
ammonium salt. This ammonium salt was acetylated with acetic
anhydride without isolation in the presence of pyridine to give
ester amide 6 in 83% yield. Transesterification of 6 with
methanolic sodium methoxide at room temperature for 24 h gave
ligand 4a in 75% yield. Ligand 4b was also prepared from 6
by a similar procedure with a yield of 74%.
ferrocene ligands, especially those with only planar chirality,
have recently gained much attention since the pioneering
4
work reported by the Ikeda group. It was also known that an
asymmetric reaction environment such as dihedral angle in
some C2-symmetric axially chiral diphosphine ligands is es-
sential for attaining high enantioselectivity in asymmetric
Catalytic Test of Palladium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic
Alkylation. With the novel C2-symmetric planar chiral P,P-
chelating ligands 4 in hand, we first tried to apply them in
palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation of rac-1,3-
diphenyl-2-propenyl acetate (9) with dimethyl malonate, which
is a classic substrate for many new kinds of ligands to test their
5
catalysis. During the development of the C2-symmetric planar
chiral ligands, we were interested to see if varying the twist
angle of the two Cp rings upon complexation of the ligands
with a metal would have an effect on the asymmetric catalytic
reaction (Figure 1).
It was reported that C2-symmetric planar chiral diphosphine
ferrocene ligands 1 were efficient for Pd-catalyzed asymmetric
allylic alkylation (Figure 1).4 When 1a was coordinated with
Pd(II), only configuration 2 of the complex was formed and no
7
asymmetric catalytic behavior. The results were summarized
in Table 1.
a,e
The influence of reaction conditions upon the allylic alky-
lation was taken into account. First of all, the effect of the
solvent on the catalytic reaction was examined with 4a (Table
3
was found at all. We conceived that the twist angle θ of 2
could have a nonneglectable effect on the catalytic activity and
enantioselectivity. On the one hand, θ could be changed via
changing metal atom Fe to Ru between the two Cp rings because
of the different distances of two Cp rings in ferrocene and
ruthenocene backbone. On the other hand, it could be also
changed by changing R′ groups on the Cp rings (Figure 1,
configuration 2). For this purpose we are interested in develop-
ing a new type of C2-symmetric planar chiral diphosphine
ruthenocene ligands. To the best of our knowledge, there are
1
, entries 1-5). Dichloromethane was selected as the best one
according to the chemical yield and the enantioselectivity. The
addition of NaOAc also affected the enantioselectivity. In the
absence of NaOAc, 83.6% ee was obtained and the enantiose-
lectivity was enhanced to 91.0% ee when it was used (Table 1,
entries 1 and 6). The temperature also affected the enantiose-
lectivity, and up to 95.7% ee was obtained at -25 °C with 4a
(
Table 1, entries 7-9). It was further shown that the R in the
ester group has an effect on this asymmetric synthesis with 4a
6
few reports on the development of chiral ruthenocene ligands.
Thus, we report herein the synthesis and crystal structure study
methyl ester leading to higher enantioselectivity compared with
4
b ethyl ester (Table 1, entries 8 and 10).
Compared with ferrocene ligands 1, much higher catalytic
(
4) (a) Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron Lett.
activity was obtained with ruthenocene ligands 4 for this
asymmetric allylic alkylation. The reactions could be completed
within 30 min at room temperature in suitable solvents and not
more than 2 h even at -25 °C (Table 1, entries 8 and 10).
1
996, 37, 7995-7998. (b) Pye, P. J.; Rossen, K.; Reamer, R.; Tsou, N.;
Volante, R.; Reider, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6207-6208. (c) Kang,
J.; Lee, J. H.; Ahn, S. H.; Choi, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5523-
5
8
526. (d) Perea, J. A.; Borner, A.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
073-8706. (e) Zhang, W.; Shimanuki, T.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda,
I. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6247-6251. (f) Manfred, T.; Reetz, M. T.;
Beuttenmuller, R.; Mireia, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4977-4980. (g)
Zhang, W.; Yoneda, Y.-I.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda, I. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1999, 574, 19-23. (h) Kang, J.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, G. J. Chirality
(7) Selected papers: (a) Trost, B. M.; Strege, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 1649-1651. (b) Trost, B. M.; Murphy, D. J. Organometallics
1985, 4, 1143-1145. (c) Imai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda,
I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4343-4346. (d) Zhang, W.; Yoneda, Y.-I.;
Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda, I. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3371-
3380. (e) Imai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Kida, T.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Ikeda, I. Synlett
1999, 1319-1321. (f) Mino, T.; Shiotsuki, M.; Yamamoto, N.; Suenaga,
T.; Sakamoto, M.; Fujita, T.; Yamashita, M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1795-
1797. (g) Trost, B. M.; Jiang, C. H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1563-1565. (h)
Tanaka, Y.; Mino, T.; Akita, K.; Sakamoto, M.; Fujita, T. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 6679-6687. (i) Pamies, O.; Dieguez, M.; Claver, C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 3646-3647. (j) Polet, D.; Alexakis, A.; Tissot-Croset, K.;
Corminboeuf, C.; Ditrich, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3596-3609. (k) Fur,
N. L.; Mojovic, L.; Ple, N.; Turck, A.; Reboul, V.; Metzner, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 2609-2616. (l) Kwong, H.-L.; Yeung, H.-L.; Lee, W.-S.;
Wong, W.-T. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4841-4843. (m) Fukuzumi, T.;
Shibata, N.; Sugiura, M.; Yasui, H.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4973-4977. (n) Raluy, E.; Claver, C.; Pamies, O.;
Dieguez, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 49-52.
2
000, 12, 378-382. (i) Chieffi, A.; Comasseto, J. V.; Snieckus, V. Synlett
000, 2, 269-271. (j) Metallinos, C.; Szillat, H.; Taylor, N. J.; Snieckus,
2
V. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 370-382. (k) Ryoichi, K.; Takashi, U.;
Makoto, S.; Ito, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2263-2271.
(
5) (a) Harada, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Hatsuda, M.; Ueda, S. J.; Oku, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2479-2482. (b) Zhang, Z. G.; Qian, H.;
Longmire, J.; Zhang, X. M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6223-6226. (c) Saito,
T.; Yokozawa, T.; Ishizaki, T.; Moroi, T.; Sayo, N.; Miura, T.; Kumoba-
yashi, H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 264-267. (d) Duprat de Paule, S.;
Jeulin, S.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Genet, J.-P.; Champion, N.; Dellis,
P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1931-1941. (e) Jeulin, S.; Duprat de Paule,
S.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Genet, J.-P.; Champion, N.; Dellis, P. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 320-325. (f) Qiu, L.; Kwong, F. Y.; Wu, J.;
Lam, W. H.; Chan, S.; Yu, W.-Y.; Li, Y.-M.; Guo, R.; Zhou, Z.; Chan, A.
S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5955-5965.
(6) (a) Hayashi, T.; Ohno, A.; Lu, S.-J.; Matsumoto, Y.; Fukuyo, E.;
Yanagi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4221-4226. (b) Bolm, C.;
Hermanns, N.; Kesselgruber, M.; Hildebrand. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001,
(8) Wimmer, P.; Widhalm, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 657-
660.
6
4
24, 157-161. (c) Liu, D. L.; Xie, F.; Zhang, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
8, 585-588.
(9) Hayashi, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Ito, Y.; Nishioka, E.; Miura, H.; Yanagi,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6301-6311.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 18, 2007 6993