2
F.-C. Yu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
O
O
Table 1
O
O
a
Ref 11j, 13
H
R2
this work
NH2 PEG-400, TFA,
Optimization of reaction conditions
R1
R1
R1
R1
O
O
NH
R2
N
N
N
R2
4
1
2
Oxone (1.2 eq),
3
o
O
NH
2
120 C, 20 min
R
R3 CHO Ref 12b-e
33 examples
yields 50-72%
F
N
F
F
e
f
1
5
H
2
f
N
R3 CHO
F
N
5
F
NH2
R2
2
O
R3
O
1
a
2a
3aa
R1
R1
N
R2
6
Entry
Solvent
Oxidant (equiv)
Catalyst
T (°C)
Yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
BQ (0.5)
DDQ (0.5)
IBD (0.5)
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
TFA
Lactic acid
TMSCl
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Reflux
120
Reflux
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
110
130
140
Trace
Trace
Trace
—
—
—
20
28
32
42
Scheme 1. Current synthesis of 1,4-DHPs.
3
AgNO (1.0)
H
2
O
2
(1.5)
partner is required for these methods. 4-Substituent 1,4-DHPs
could not be prepared from the condensation of N,N-dimethyle-
naminones 1 and amines 2. Based on our previous work on
enaminone-based heterocycle synthesis,14 we wish to report here
an oxone/TFA-promoted direct synthesis of 1,4-DHPs 3 from N,N-
dimethylenaminones 1 and amines 2 in PEG-400 (Scheme 1). Our
protocol involves a unique oxidation of dimethylamine released
from the amine-exchange of N,N-dimethylenaminones 1. To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first example of 1,4-DHPs synthe-
sis with an in situ-formed aldehyde partner.
TBHP (0.5)
CAN (1.0)
2
K S
2
O
8
(1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (1.0)
Oxone (0.8)
Oxone (1.2)
Oxone (2.0)
Oxone (1.2)
Oxone (1.2)
Oxone (1.2)
10
11
28
12
13
14
15
Trace
Trace
22
20
30
26
27
48
50
55
40
43
68
37
34
67
63
1,4-Dioxane
p-Xylene
Toluene
DMSO
16
17
EG
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Glycerol
PEG-200
PEG-300
PEG-400
PEG-600
PEG-400
PEG-400
PEG-400
PEG-400
PEG-400
PEG-400
Results and discussion
In the beginning of our study, N,N-dimethylenaminone 1a and
-fluoroaniline (2a) were selected as model substrates for screen-
4
TFA
TFA
TFA
TFA
ing the reaction conditions. As shown in Table 1, different solvents,
oxidants, catalysts and reaction temperatures were tested. First,
oxidants were investigated in the presence of AcOH. 1,4-Benzoqui-
none (BQ), DDQ and iodobenzene diacetate (IBD) afforded only
trace amounts of the desired 1,4-DHPs 3aa in DMF at 120 °C
26
27
28
TFA
a
Reagents and conditions: N,N-dimethylenaminone 1a (1.0 mmol), 4-fluoroani-
line 2a (0.5 mmol), catalyst (0.2 mL), solvent (5.0 mL).
(
(
entries 1–3), whereas AgNO
entries 4–6). To our delight, formation of 3aa were observed for
(entries 7–8), and oxone was found
3
, H
2
O
2
and TBHP was ineffective
b
Isolated yield based on N,N-dimethylenaminone 1a.
2 2 8
reactions with CAN and K S O
more efficient (entry 9). Next, the role of the acid was studied using
oxone as the oxidant. Among the acids tested, TFA was more effi-
cient (entries 9, 11–12 vs entry 10). Various solvents were then
screened in the presence of TFA and oxone (entries 10, 13–22).
The reaction in PEG-400 provided an increased yield of the desired
product 3aa (55%, entry 21).15 After further investigation of the
oxone amount and reaction temperature, we found that the reac-
tion with 1.2 equiv oxone to the amine in the presence of TFA in
PEG-400 at 120 °C provided the best result (68%, entry 24 vs entries
2
3, 25–28). Various reaction times have also been tested. The reac-
tion could not reach complete conversion while the reaction time
is less than 20 min (5, 10 or 15 min). But for longer reaction times
(
25 and 30 min), the desired product 3aa decomposed signifi-
cantly. A 20-min reaction time was thus adopted.
With the optimal reaction condition in hand (Table 1, entry 24),
the scope of substrates was explored. The results are summarized
1
in Table 2. N,N-Dimethylenaminones 1 with various R group,
including electron-poor (1a–1b), electron-neutral (1c) and elec-
tron-rich (1d–1e), proceeded smoothly and afforded the desired
Figure 2. ORTEP diagram of 3ce; ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
1
,4-DHPs 3 in moderate to good yields. Similarly, variation of the
amine partner 2 showed little impact on the results, although
cyclohexylamine tends to give lower yields than arylamines. All
of electron-rich and electron-poor anilines (2a–2g) are effective
substrates and able to generate the expected 3 in moderate to good
yields. Moreover, cyclohexylamine 2h is also a suitable substrate.
The structure of 3ce was further confirmed by X-ray single-crystal
diffraction studies (Fig. 2, CCDC 1026867).1
To provide insights into the reaction mechanism, several con-
trol experiments were carried out (Scheme 2). For the reaction of
N,N-dimethylenaminone 1c and aniline 2c in the absence of oxone,
1
3a
no 3cc was detected. Instead, N-phenylenaminone 4a
was iso-
lated in 95% yield (Scheme 2, Eq. 1). N-Phenylenaminone 4a could
react with 1c under the standard condition to give 3cc in an
impressive 45% yield (Scheme 2, Eq. 2). Furthermore, while 4a
6