ARTICLE IN PRESS
Z. Zhang et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 180 (2007) 1083–1092
1084
therein), and the different possible tilt systems are
described in terms of the component tilts around the x-,
y- and z-axes of the parent perovskite, making use of
Glazer’s notation [11,12]. Because of the corner connec-
diffraction data, we were able to prove that the correct
space group for the orthorhombic structure at x ¼ 0.4 and
0.5 is Pbnm, not Ibmm as previously reported. Vashook
and co-workers also carried out high-temperature studies
on a small number of compositions (x ¼ 0.4, 0.9, 0.96)
[18,19]. We have conducted studies on additional composi-
tions using both neutron and synchrotron X-ray diffraction
searching for phase transitions, so that a temperature–
composition phase diagram could be constructed.
tions of the BO octahedra the tilting of one octahedron
6
around any of these axes completely determines the tilting
in the plane perpendicular to that axis. The tilting of
octahedra in the next plane along the axis must be the same
in magnitude but can be either in the same (in-phase) or
opposite (out-of-phase) sense. Glazer’s symbol then is of
#
# #
the form a b c in which the literals refer in turn to tilts
around the parent x-, y- and z-axes and the superscript #
takes the values +, ꢀ, 0 to indicate in-phase, out-of-phase,
and no tilting, respectively. The repetition of a letter
indicates both tilt angles and lattice repeats, relating to the
corresponding axes, are equal. The crystal structures
corresponding to the different tilt systems with or without
layered cation/vacancy ordering have been obtained using
group theory and recorded elsewhere [10,13]. The experi-
mental determination of the crystal structures thus reduces
to the search for evidence for layered cation/vacancy
ordering and the nature of the tilts involved.
2. Experimental
Samples of Ca(
La2x/3TiO at x ¼ 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4,
1ꢀx)
3
0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9 were produced by the standard
ceramic solid state technique. Stoichiometric quantities of
CaCO (Alfa-Aesar, 99.9%), La O (Aldrich, 99.5%) and
3
2
3
TiO (Alfa-Aesar, 99.9%) powders were mixed and ground
2
with ethanol in a ball mill. After drying, the mixtures were
heated in air at 1373 K for 1 day and then at 1523 K for 2
days, with cooling and regrinding after the initial heating
step. The crystallinity and phase purity of the products
were checked using laboratory powder X-ray diffraction
with Cu K radiation. The x ¼ 0 end member, CaTiO , was
The room temperature structure of the CaTiO3 end
member was established long ago [14]. It is orthorhombic
a
3
a high-purity powder sample purchased from Aldrich.
Time-of-flight powder neutron diffraction data were
recorded at room temperature for all samples using the
high-resolution powder diffractometer, HRPD, at the ISIS
neutron facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratories, UK
[21]. The ground samples were loaded into thin-walled
11 mm diameter vanadium sample cans, which were then
suspended from the standard ISIS candlesticks. Diffraction
patterns from the samples were recorded over the time-of-
flight range 30–130 ms in both back-scattering and 901
detector banks, corresponding to d-spacings from 0.6 to
ꢀ
ꢀ +
in space group Pbnm, tilt system a a c . At 1498 K it
undergoes a discontinuous transition to a tetragonal
0
0 ꢀ
structure, space group I4/mcm, tilt system a a c , then at
634 K a continuous transition to the basic cubic structure,
1
space group Pm3m, tilt system a a a ([15] and references
0
0 0
¯
therein). As mentioned at the outset, the room temperature
structure for the other end member La2/3TiO has been
3
elucidated only very recently [5–7]. It is orthorhombic, in
ꢀ
0 0
space group Cmmm, and the tilt system is a b c . Upon
heating, there is a continuous transition as the tilt vanishes
ꢀ
4
˚
˚
(
but the layered ordering remains), and the structure at
elevated temperature is tetragonal, space group P4/mmm,
2.6 A (at a resolution Dd/dꢁ4 ꢂ 10 ) and from 0.9 to 3.7 A
ꢀ3
(Dd/dꢁ2 ꢂ 10 ), respectively. The patterns were normal-
ised to the incident beam spectrum as recorded in the
upstream monitor, and corrected for detector efficiency
according to prior calibration with a vanadium scan.
Patterns were recorded to a minimum total incident proton
beam of about 75 mA h at room temperature, correspond-
ing to ꢁ2.3 h of data collection, to allow good structure
determinations. High-temperature neutron diffraction pat-
0
0 0
tilt system a a c . The temperature of the orthorhombic to
tetragonal transition has been reported as 633 K in
La0.6Sr0.1TiO3 [6], 623 K in La0.68Ti0.95Al0.05O3 [16],
643 K in La0.63Ti0.92Nb0.08O3 [17], and 784 K in
La0.6Ca0.1TiO [18]. Vashook and co-workers [19,20] have
carried out mostly room temperature studies across the
3
(
and reported four structures according to composition: in
1ꢀx)CaTiO –xLa TiO system using X-ray diffraction,
3
2/3
3
terns were also obtained for Ca0.7La0.2TiO (x ¼ 0.3) up to
3
Pbnm (as for CaTiO ) for 0pxo0.4, then Ibmm for
1173 K, with the vanadium sample can mounted in an ISIS
designed furnace. The RAL furnace employs a cylindrical
vanadium element and operates under high vacuum
3
0
.4pxo0.7, I4/mcm for 0.7pxo0.8, and finally in Cmmm
for 0.8pxp0.96 (as for the end member La TiO ).
2
/3
3
ꢀ
4
However, this system covers a wide range of compositions
in pseudo-cubic symmetry (0.4pxp0.8), which means that
the correct structural identification relies on the presence of
superlattice reflections (arising from octahedral tilting in
this case). Since octahedral tilting involves the movement
of oxygen ions only, the corresponding superlattice
reflections would show more strongly in neutron diffrac-
tion patterns than X-ray ones. Therefore, we considered it
worthwhile to revisit this system using neutron diffraction
measurements. Based on our high-resolution neutron
(pressure o10 mbar). The thermometry is based on
type-K (chromel–alumel) thermocouples, the controlling
one positioned in contact with the sample can at about
20 mm above the beam centre. The sample temperature was
controlled to 70.5 K. The high-temperature patterns were
first collected in 100 K steps from 373 to 1173 K to a total
incident proton beam of about 75 mA h, then in 10 K steps
down to 1073 K to a total incident proton beam of about
35 mA h (finer temperature intervals but shorter counting
time in order to follow the phase transition in detail). In