L. Lei et al.
Inorganica Chimica Acta 519 (2021) 120282
Table 2
The results of the benzylamine oxidative coupling reaction in different solvent
catalyzed by MnCl2(TPA).[a]
Entry
Solvent
Conversion[b] (%)
Yield[b] (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
water
53.5
80.6
98.2
62.8
22.5
25.2
42.6
67.4
93.4
51.8
19.3
20.1
methanol
acetonitrile
dichloromethane
toluene
cyclohexane
[a]
Reaction conditions: benzylamine (1.0 mmol), TBHP (2.0 mmol), catalyst
(0.2 mol%), 30 ◦C, 1 h.
[b]
The same as Table 1.
25 mL round-bottom flask. Typically, benzylamine (1 mmol), TBHP (2
mmol), and catalyst (0.2 mol%, bsed on the mol of benzylamine) in
CH3CN (5 mL) were quickly added into the flask. Then, the reaction
Fig. 1. Effect of oxidant on benzylamine oxidative coupling reaction (Reaction
conditions: benzylamine (1.0 mmol), oxidant (2.0 mmol), MnCl2(TPA) (0.2 mol
%), acetonitrile (5 mL), 30 ◦C, 1 h).
◦
mixture was stirred at room temperature (30 C). After reaction, 2–3
drops of reaction mixture were added to 2 mL acetonitrile, and dried by
anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The product was analyzed by GC using a
Shimadzu GC 2010 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization
detector and a capillary column (Rtx-5, 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 mm).
The conversion and selectivity were determined using the calibration
curves obtained with naphthalene as an internal standard and each
authentic imine product. All reactions were repeated at least three times,
and the average values were used.
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
b
a
b
a
(B)
(A)
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
TBHP dasage (mmol)
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
Catalyst dosage (mol%)
3. Results and discussion
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
b
b
The oxidative coupling of benzylamine (1a) with TBHP in acetoni-
trile was chose as a model reaction to evaluate the catalytic performance
of as-perpared non-heme metal complexes. The results were listed in the
Table 1.
a
a
(C)
First, the control experiment was carried out at 30 ◦C in the absence
of any catalyst, giving a negligible yield of 3.1% to benzylidenebenzyl-
amine (2a) within 1 h (Table 1, entry 1). Then, several metal comlexes
including CoCl2(TPA), NiCl2(TPA), CuCl2(TPA), ZnCl2(TPA),
FeCl3(TPA) and MnCl2(TPA) were examined under the same reaction
conditions (Table 1, entries 2 ~ 7). It was found that MnCl2(TPA) and
FeCl3(TPA) showed highly effective of these, and gave a good yields of
87.5 and 93.4% to 2a, respectivly (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). Besides, the
catalytic activity of manganese complexes was not very sensitive to the
anions of these catalyts, such as Cl-, Br- and (ClO4)-, and the coores-
ponding complexes exhibited satisfactory performance (Table 1, entry 7
~ 9). Benzaldehyde is the main by-product in this transformation.
Moreover, various solvents, such as water, acetonitrile, methanol,
dichloromethane, toluene, and cyclohexane were explored in the
oxidative coupling reaction of benzylamine in different solvent cata-
lyzed by MnCl2(TPA). As listed in Table 2, the catalytic activity strongly
influenced by the solvent polarity. Water, known as the strong polar
green solvent, has been attracted continuous attention in some organic
reactions. This transformation could proceed in water with a moderate
conversion (Table 2, entry 1). When the slightly lower polarity methanol
was used, the catalytic activity was obviously increased to give a 80.6%
conversion (Table 2, entry 2). This probably due to strong interaction
between the solvent and the metal center of catalyst, suppressing the
ability of the formation of the active high-valence metal species in the
oxidative progress [43]. Nearly complete conversion of benzylamine to
the imine was observed in acetonitrile (Table 2, entry 3). Decreasing the
polarity of the solvent showed a decrease in the conversion to benzyl-
amine (Table 2, entry 4 ~ 6). The lower activity in nonpolar solvents
may be attributed to the limited compatibility of the benzylamine and
catalyst in the aqueous solution of the oxidant [44].
(D)
15
10 20 30 40 50
Temperature ( C)
30
45
60
75
Time (min)
Fig. 2. Effect of the catalyst dosage (A), TBHP dosage (B), reaction temperature
(C) and time (D) on catalytic performance of MnCl2(TPA) (a: conversion; b:
selectivity). Reaction conditions: (A) benzylamine (1 mmol), TBHP (2 mmol),
30 ◦C, 1 h; (B) MnCl2(TPA) (0.2 mol%), benzylamine (1 mmol), 30 ◦C, 1 h; (C)
MnCl2(TPA) (0.2 mol%), benzylamine (1 mmol), TBHP (2 mmol), 1 h; (D)
MnCl2(TPA) (0.2 mol%), benzylamine (1 mmol), TBHP (2 mmol), 30 ◦C.
hydrogen peroxide (UHP) and were investigated. As shown in Fig. 1,
Use of H2O2 as an oxidant gave relatively poor conversion of 18.2% with
a selectivity of 81.7%. During this reaction process, H2O2 was decom-
pounded rapidly with the observation of generation of oxygen bubbles,
thereby reducing the oxidization capability. Further, high conversions
(>92.2%) of amine with good selectivities (90.0%) of desired imine
were achieved by using other organic oxidants (TBHP, CHP and UHP). In
particular, a complete conversion of benzyl amine to the imine was
observed in the presence of TBHP. Therefore, we selected TBHP as the
oxidant in the following studies. Moreover, a reaction carried out under
N2 atmosphere yielded only traces of the desired imine demonstrating
the necessity for oxidizing conditions in this transformation.
To screen the optimal reaction conditions for this transformation, the
effect of various reaction parameters (catalyst dosage, TBHP dosage,
temperature and time) was investigated in detail and the results were
summarized in Fig. 2. First, the influence of the dosage of Mn(TPA)2 was
studied as represented in Fig. 2A. The higher activity of the catalyst was
observed with the increasing amount of catalyst from 0.1 to 0.2 mol%
where the benzylamine conversion increased from 62.2 to 98.3% with a
selectivity of 95.1%. A further increase in catalyst mount to 0.3 mol%
had little effect on conversion and selectivity, while the use of 0.35 mol
% led to a clear decrease in both conversion and selectivity. Similarly, a
To standardize the oxidant needed for this reaction, common ter-
minal oxidants, including aqueous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), t-butyl
hydroperoxide (TBHP), cumene hydroperoxide (CHP) and urea-
3