C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Isomerization of Allylic Substrates by 6
the substrate to enter the host cavity through the channels in the
ligand walls, preventing it from interacting with the active catalyst.
This is an example of the high shape selectivity of the supramo-
lecular catalyst: the isosteric linear allyl methyl ether is isomerized
quantitatively (Table 3, entry 7).
When both allyl alcohol and crotyl alcohol were added to [6 ⊂
Ga4L6], selective isomerization of allyl alcohol to propionaldehyde
was observed. This suggests that, while the supramolecular host
prevents crotyl alcohol from entering the cavity and deactivating
the catalyst, allyl alcohol has ready access to the encapsulated
catalyst. In combination with the slow rate of catalyst dissociation,
these selectivity results indicate that the highly specific substrate
selectivities are enforced by encapsulation within the well-defined
cavity of the host.
In conclusion, a supramolecular Ga4L6 host has been shown to
encapsulate a variety of cationic rhodium catalysts. This is a
remarkable example of the supramolecular encapsulation of discrete
organometallic catalysts, in this case resulting in supramolecular
control over the catalytic isomerization of allylic alcohols to give
highly specific size and shape substrate selectivities. In contrast to
the behavior of the free rhodium catalyst, in situ selectivity between
allyl alcohol and crotyl alcohol resulted in no inhibition by crotyl
alcohol and complete isomerization of allyl alcohol. These results
demonstrate that a synthetic supramolecular outer-sphere environ-
ment can direct control of catalytic reactivity at a metal centers
much like enzymes do in nature.
a Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. b1:1 E:Z enol ether was obtained.
Table 3. Isomerization of Allylic Substrates by [6 ⊂ Ga4L6]
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Dorothea Fiedler for helpful
discussion and Drs. Ulla Anderson and Georg Seeber for mass
spectrometry assistance. This work was supported by the Director,
Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
Division, of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-
AC02-05CH11231.
a Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. b 1:1 E:Z enol ether was
obtained.
the COD ligand. Upon addition of the allylic alcohol, complete
conversion to the corresponding isomerized product was observed
within 0.5 h at 25 °C (Table 1, entry 1). Isomerization of allylic
ethers to the corresponding enol ethers was also observed (Table
1, entries 7 and 8). The reaction does not tolerate terminal
substitution; no isomerization of crotyl alcohol was observed (Table
1, entry 4). Significantly, when both allyl alcohol and crotyl alcohol
were added to the active catalyst, no isomerization of either substrate
was observed, indicating that crotyl alcohol inhibits the catalyst.
Having established the catalytic behavior of 6, the encapsulated
catalyst was generated by addition of 1 atm H2 to an aqueous
solution of [1 ⊂ Ga4L6]. Under these conditions, a new species
was observable by NMR spectroscopy after several hours at room
temperature, which was identified as [6 ⊂ Ga4L6]. However, after
12 h at room temperature, the guest was no longer encapsulated
by the host, indicating that the equilibrium favors the unencapsulated
rhodium complex. This is not surprising, considering that 6 is highly
solvated. This result suggests that 6 is kinetically formed within
the host cavity and slowly dissociates irreversibly into the bulk
solution. Indeed, when 6 was independently prepared and added
to an aqueous solution of Na12[Ga4L6], no encapsulation was
observed. Thus, any reactivity with [6 ⊂ Ga4L6], including substrate
entrance and product release, must be rapid enough to occur prior
to guest dissociation.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
characterization of key intermediates. This material is available free
References
(1) (a) Ito, H.; Kusukawa, T.; Fujita, M. Chem. Lett. 2000, 598-599. (b)
Slagt, V. F.; Kramer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Reek, J. N. H.
J Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1526-1536. (c) Kuil, M.; Soltner, T.; van
Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Reek, J. N. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
11344-11345. (d) Kleij, A. W.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; van Leeuwen, P.
W. N. M.; Reek, J. N. H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 29, 3661-3663. (e)
Morris, G. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hupp, J. T. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001,
174, 15-20. (f) Lee, S. J.; Hu, A.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
12948-12949. (g) Gianneschi, N. C.; Masar, M. S., III; Mirkin, C. A.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 825-837. (h) For a recent review, see: Kleij,
A. W.; Reek, J. N. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4218-4227 and references
therein.
(2) (a) Caulder, D. L.; Powers, R. E.; Parac, T. N.; Raymond, K. N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1840-1843. (b) Caulder, D. L.; Bruckner, C.;
Powers, R. E.; Konig, S.; Parac, T. N.; Leary, J. A.; Raymond, K. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8923-8938.
(3) (a) Fiedler, D.; Leung, D. H.; Bergman, R. G.; Raymond, K. N. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 351-360. (b) Fiedler, D.; van Halbeek, H.; Bergman,
R. G.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10240-10252. (c)
Leung, D. H.; Bergman, R. G.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 9781-9797.
(4) Evans, P. A., Ed. Modern Rhodium-Catalyzed Organic Reactions; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2005.
In sharp contrast to the results with unencapsulated 6, selective
isomerization of specific allylic alcohols was observed when
substrates were added to [6 ⊂ Ga4L6] (Table 3). Only alcohols of
the correct size and shape are able to enter the host cavity and
react with the metal catalyst. For example, the small allyl alcohol
is isomerized within 0.5 h at room temperature (Table 3, entry 1),
whereas larger substrates are not isomerized. Substrates with methyl
branching do not react at all, in contrast to the results with 6 (Table
3, entries 2 and 3). We infer that branching inhibits the ability of
(5) (a) Tani, K. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 1845-1854. (b) Uma, R.; Cre´visy,
C.; Gre´e, R. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 27-52.
(6) Rhodium bis-phosphine solvento species have been implicated in the
isomerization of allylic substrates. See: Bergens, S. H.; Bosnich, B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 958-967. We thank a referee for the
suggestion that in this case a rhodium hydride species may also be the
active catalytic species for this transformation. The NMR resonance for
the hydride may be masked by H-D exchange with the bulk solvent.
Since 6 is highly reactive, we were unable to isolate and fully characterize
it to definitively distinguish these two possibilities.
JA068688O
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 10, 2007 2747