4
28
B. P. Bandgar et al.: Tetrahydropyranylation Catalyzed by CaCl2
ꢁ
THP group using the same catalyst in methanol at 25 C or re¯ux temperature
ꢁ
ꢀ
65 C) failed.
Attempts to effect tetrahydropyranylation of alcohols using catalysts such as
NaCl, KCl, or CoCl failed. However, Lewis acids such as ZnCl and LiCl are
2
2
useful to some extent as catalysts for the preparation of THP ethers. Considering
recently reported results on the tetrahydropyranylation of alcohols using lithium
perchlorate [6], the present protocol is superior in terms of cost, yields, and reac-
tion times. t-Butanol in diethyl ether with lithium perchlorate as catalyst afforded
the corresponding THP ether in 56% yield within a period of 17 h, whereas the
THP ether of the same alcohol was obtained in 80% yield in 4.5 h using anhydrous
calcium chloride. In this case, the advantage lies in the neutral reaction conditions
which restrict dehydration of the alcohol as compared to the weakly acidic con-
ditions of lithium perchlorate in diethyl ether. Benzyl alcohol and cyclohexanol
gave the corresponding THP ethers in excellent yields in 1.5 h and 2.5 h with CaCl2,
whereas the lithium perchlorate pathway required 12 h for the same reaction.
In conclusion, anhydrous calcium chloride has been found to be an excellent
inexpensive catalyst for the protection of alcohols and phenols as THP ethers under
neutral and mild conditions ꢀroom temperature).
Experimental
1
IR spectra were recorded on a Bomem MB-104 FTIR spectrometer, H NMR spectra on a Bruker AC-
3
00 F NMR spectrometer operating at 300 MHz using CDCl as solvent and TMS as internal standard.
3
General procedure for the preparation of THP ethers
ꢁ
A mixture of 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran ꢀ7mmol) and 5 mmol of alcohol was stirred at 25 C in the
3
presence of 1 mmol anhydrous CaCl in 5 cm CH Cl . After completion of the reaction ꢀTLC), the
2
2
2
3
catalyst was ®ltered off and washed with 3Â5 cm CH Cl . The solvent was removed under vacuum,
2
2
and the product was further puri®ed by column chromatography on silica gel ꢀhexane:ethyl
acetate 9:1). The products were identi®ed by TLC, elemental analyses, and spectroscopic data [2, 4].
Acknowledgments
V. S. Sadavarte thanks CSIR, New Delhi, for a junior research fellowship. S. V. Patil thanks UGC,
New Delhi, for a teacher fellowship.
References
[
1] a) Greene TW, Wuts PGM ꢀ1991) Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd edn. Wiley,
New York; b) Paquette LA ꢀ1995) Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis. Wiley
2] Olah GA, Hussain A, Singh BP ꢀ1985) Synthesis 703, and references cited therein
3] Bolitt V, Mioskowski C, Shin DS, Falck JR ꢀ1998) Tetrahedron Lett 4583
[
[
[
[
[
[
4] Hoyer S, Laszlo P, Orlovic M, Polla E ꢀ1986) Synthesis 655, and references cited therein
5] Bandgar BP, Jagtap SR, Aghade BB, Wadgaonkar PP ꢀ1995) Synth Commun 25: 2211
6] Babu BS, Balasubramanian KK ꢀ1998) Tetrahedron Lett 39: 9287
7] Sampathkumar HM, Subba Reddy BV, Jagan Reddy E, Yadav JS ꢀ1999) Chem Lett 857