Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.9 (2004)
1087
in the absence of the CD, indicating that PyS was not bound to
2,3-diCO2ꢂ-ꢀ-CD at all at pD > 6:0.
2, 3-diCO2H-β-CD + PyS
H-8
In order to generalize pH-dependent inclusion of 2,3-
diCO2H-ꢀ-CD, 1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate (ANS) and 2-
(p-methylanilino)-6-naphthalenesulfonate (TNS) were used as
the guests. Both fluorophores are well known as hydrophobic flu-
orescent probes. Figure 2 shows the relative fluorescence inten-
sity changes of ANS and TNS in aqueous solutions containing
2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD and/or 2,3-diCO2ꢂ-ꢀ-CD as a function of
pH. In acidic solution at pH 2, the fluorescence intensity of
TNS was much larger than that of ANS. This is reasonably inter-
preted in terms of the difference in K values. The size of TNS is
suitable to be included into the CD cavity.7 The K values of ANS
and TNS for complexation with 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD, which were
determined in D2O at pD 2.0 (DCl) containing 0.1 M NaCl from
the 1H NMR titration, were 71 ꢁ 4 and 6300 ꢁ 400 Mꢂ1, respec-
tively. In both cases, sharp pH-dependency was observed. The
acid-dissociation of 2,3-dꢂiCO2H-ꢀ-CD causes electrostatic re-
pulsion between the CO2 groups of the host and the anionic
host and guest leading to ejection of the guest from the CD cav-
ity. The pH-dependency curves shown in Figure 2 do not neces-
sarily correspond to the pH-titration curve for determining pKa
of 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD. The pH-sensitivity in ejection of a guest
from the CD cavity should depend on the nature of the guest.
PyS has a larger hydrophobic part as compared with ANS and
TNS. Therefore, the PyS molecule might tend to resist the ejec-
tion from the cavity of partially dissociated 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD.
H-5
H-6
H-3
H-4
H-1
H-2
H-8
H-7
H-5
H-6
H-3
H-4
2, 3-diCO2H-
β-CD
H-1
H-2
3.5
4.5
δ / ppm
4.0
5.0
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra of 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD (5 ꢄ 10ꢂ4 M)
in D2O containing 0.1 M NaCl in the absence and the presence of
PyS (5 ꢄ 10ꢂ4 M) at pD 2.0 (DCl).
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research B (KAKENHI 14340224) from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
and a Sekisui Foundation.
References and Notes
1
a) K. Tsujihara, H. Kurita, and M. Kawazu, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 50, 1567 (1977). b) F. Guillo, B. Hamelin, L. Jullien, J.
Canceill, J.-M. Lehn, L. De Robertis, and H. Driguez, Bull.
Soc. Chim. Fr., 132, 857 (1995). c) A. Gadelle and J. Defaye,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 30, 78 (1991).
Figure 2. Changes in the chemical shift of the proton at the 2-
position of PyS (5 ꢄ 10ꢂ4 M) in D2O at pD 2.0 and in the fluo-
rescence intensities of ANS (2 ꢄ 10ꢂ5 M) and TNS (5 ꢄ 10ꢂ6
M) in H2O at pH 2.0 in the presence of 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD
and/or 2,3-diCO2ꢂ-ꢀ-CD as a function of pD or pH at 25 ꢃC.
The initial concentrations of 2,3-diCO2Na-ꢀ-CD were 2:5 ꢄ
10ꢂ3, 5 ꢄ 10ꢂ4, and 1 ꢄ 10ꢂ4 M for PyS, ANS, and TNS, re-
spectively. ANS and TNS were excited at 400 and 335 nm, re-
spectively.
2
3
4
T. Kitae, T. Nakayama, and K. Kano, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1998, 207; K. Kano, S. Arimoto, and T. Ishimura,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 1661.
a) K. Kano and H. Hasegawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 10616
(2001). b) K. Kano, H. Hasegawa, and M. Miyamura,
Chirality, 13, 474 (2002).
For example; a) H. Jin, F. Li, J. Gu, R. Fu, Y. Liu, and R. Dai,
Fenxi Huaxue, 24, 1387 (1996); CAN 126:162355. b) H.
Wang, J. L. Gu, F. H. Fang, J. D. Ji, H. D. Tian, and R. N.
Fu, Anal. Chim. Acta, 359, 39 (1998).
K. Takeo, H. Mitoh, and K. Uemura, Carbohydr. Res., 187,
203 (1989).
ly. Upfield shifts were observed with the protons at the wider rim
of 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD and slight downfield shifts were measured
with the protons at the narrower rim. These results definitely in-
dicate that the PyS molecule is bound to the OCH2CO2H group
side of 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD. Job’s plot for 1H NMR signals of 2,3-
diCO2H-ꢀ-CD revealed the formation of a 1:1 complex. The
binding constant (K) for complexation of PyS with 2,3-
diCO2H-ꢀ-CD was determined from 1H NMR titration to be
2300 ꢁ 100 Mꢂ1 in D2O containing 0.1 M NaCl at pD 2.0
(DCl) and 25 ꢃC. 2,3-diCO2H-ꢀ-CD poured out PyS as increas-
ing pD as shown in Figure 2, where changes in the chemical shift
of the proton at the 2-position of PyS are shown as a function of
pD. The chemical shift at pD > 6:0 was the same as that of PyS
5
6
Analytical data for 2,3-diCO2Na-ꢀ-CD: IR (KBr): 3418,
2932, 1607, 1427, 1331, 1030 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (400 MHz,
.
D2O, TSP) ꢁ 3.586 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 9:0 and 3.0 Hz), 3.794–
3.979 (m, 4H), 4.360 (dd, 2H, J ¼ 33 and 17 Hz), 4.719
(dd, 2H, J ¼ 77 and 16 Hz). Anal. Calcd. for
.
C70H77O63Na14 18H2O: C, 32.59; H, 4.69%. Found: C,
32.38; H, 4.48%.
M. V. Rekharsky and Y. Inoue, Chem. Rev., 98, 1875 (1998).
7
Published on the web (Advance View) July 26, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.1086