152
D.J. Thompson et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 424 (2015) 150–155
Table 1
O
S
O
O
Sulfide substrates catalyzed by C with 8 equivalents H2O2.
S
H2O2
S
+
Substrate
BPS
Entry
Hours
% RSR0
% RSOR0
% RSO2R0
TOFa
Catalyst
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0.33
2.0
5.0
24
0.33
2.0
24
0.33
2.0
24
0.33
2.0
24
15
0
0
82
82
76
63
50
72
93
97
93
80
92
86
50
1
17
22
37
0
0
3
1
7
19
0
13
49
255
58
24
6
150
36
4
300
54
5
280
56
6
MPS
MPSO
MPSO2
0
Scheme 1. Conversion of methyl phenyl sulfide to sulfoxide and sulfone.
PPS
4BT
PTE
50
27
4
0
0
0
7
0
0
It is clear from Fig. 2 that the reaction catalyzed by A has no
observable induction period. It is also obvious that the conversion
of sulfoxide to sulfone becomes concurrent with the conversion of
sulfide to sulfoxide after an appreciable amount of sulfoxide (ca.
40%) is formed. At 60 min, the reaction has resulted in the disap-
pearance of 96% of sulfide with the formation of 85% sulfoxide
and 11% sulfone.
a
Turnover frequency (hourꢀ1) = {[RSOR0] + 2[RSO2R0]}/[Cat]*time (hour).
Slightly different from that of A, the reaction with catalyst B dis-
plays a short induction period (the first 2 min) followed by rapid
conversion of sulfide to sulfoxide (Fig. 3). Yet, the reaction pro-
ceeded much faster than that with A and is step-wise: conversion
of MPS to MPSO completed in 6 min with almost no MPSO2, and
88% of MPSO2 was present at 60 min.
As shown in Fig. 4, the reaction catalyzed by C displayed an
induction period similar to that observed for B. The conversion of
sulfide to sulfoxide completed in 15 min, slower than that with B
but faster than that with A. On the other hand, the sulfoxide to sul-
fone conversion is very slow with C and only 3% of sulfone was
detected at 60 min. Thus C proceeds not only in a stepwise progres-
sion but is rather selective for sulfoxide formation.
There are two notable features in the activity of catalysts A, B
and C. First, MPS is fully consumed in 6 and 15 min. with B and
C, respectively, whereas 5% of MPS remains with A in 60 min. Sec-
ond, reactions with B and C are stepwise: there is no production of
sulfone till the complete consumption of sulfide. On the other
hand, sulfone started appearing around 15 min while a substantial
amount of sulfide (>40%) was still present in the reaction with A. It
is well established that while the oxygenation of sulfide can be
accomplished through either electrophilic or nucleophilic attack,
the oxygenation of sulfoxide is accomplished through nucleophilic
attack [29]. The insignificant sulfone production seems to indicate
that the active species derived from C is significantly more electro-
philic than these derived from both A and B. The structural differ-
ences among the three compounds may play a role in selectivity as
well. The large difference in steric bulk from the relatively unhin-
dered A to the bulkier B and C may also explain some of the latter’s
preference for the sulfoxide formation since the sulfur center in
sulfide is easier to access than that in sulfoxide.
were investigated under conditions similar to the MPS reactions in
Section 2.2. Product yields were assessed with gas chromatogra-
phy. The results of these experiments are summarized in Table 1.
The reaction with the bulky BPS yielded 82% conversion to sulf-
oxide, 1% to sulfone and 14% residual sulfide at 20 min, corre-
sponding to a TOF of 255 hꢀ1, and 82% sulfoxide and 17% sulfone
at 2 h. The reaction with bulkier and less electron rich PPS resulted
in only 50% sulfoxide and no sulfone at 20 min (TOF of 150 hꢀ1),
and 72% of sulfoxide and 27% of unreacted sulfide at 2 h. The reac-
tion with 4BT yielded similar results to that with MPS: 97% sulfox-
ide, 1% sulfone and no detectable sulfide (TOF: 300 hꢀ1) at 20 min,
and 93% sulfoxide and 7% sulfone at 2 h. Similarly, the reaction
with PTE resulted in 92% sulfoxide and 7% sulfide at 20 min, and
86% sulfoxide and 13% sulfone at 2 h. It is clear from these reactiv-
ity data that catalyst C favors the fast and selective formation of
sulfoxide, while it is much slower in the conversion to sulfone.
Also, the reaction with the most sterically hindered and electron
deficient PPS is substantially slower than the other three
substrates.
2.4. Rate dependence on [H2O2]
The efficacy of catalysts A, B and C in activating H2O2 for sulfide
oxygenation encourages further study of the reaction kinetics,
which is largely based on the initial rates method by monitoring
of the disappearance of MPS at 290 nm that has been used effec-
tively in analysis of MPS oxygenation [20,21,30–32]. First analyzed
was the rate dependence on [H2O2].
For each catalyst the dependence on hydrogen peroxide con-
centration was investigated using 5–50 equiv of hydrogen perox-
ide with respect to the substrate (2.0 mM). The ln(Abs290) versus
time plots during the first 15 min were consistent with pseudo-
first order kinetics. The kobs obtained were plotted against the
equiv of H2O2 in Fig. 5 with catalysts A, B and C. For all three cat-
alysts, the rate dependence followed a pseudo-first order pattern
until reaching saturation.
2.3. Catalytic oxygenation of other sulfides C
Because of both the fast turnover and selectivity in producing
sulfoxide with catalyst C, additional sulfide substrates (Scheme 2)
The [H2O2] needed to reach saturation was found to be similar
between catalysts A and B at 30 equiv and 25 equiv, respectively.
However, catalyst C reaches saturation at the significantly lower
[H2O2] of 15 equiv, which is consistent with C being more electro-
philic than A and B. For all three catalysts krel[H2O2] was found
from the linear regression of the pseudo-first order region of the
equivalents H2O2 versus kobs plots. In all three cases the linear fit
was forced through the origin as there is no conversion of sulfide
to sulfoxide in the presence of catalyst without hydrogen peroxide.
The resulting krel data are in the order of C > B > A, with that of C
S
S
Benzyl phenyl sulfide (BPS)
Phenyl sulfide (PPS)
S
S
OH
Br
4-Bromo thioanisole (4BT)
Phenyl thioethanol (PTE)
being the highest at 4.3 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 minꢀ1, followed by 3.8 ꢁ 10ꢀ3
-
Scheme 2. Sulfide substrates oxygenated with hydrogen peroxide via catalysis
with C.
minꢀ1 and 2.5 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 minꢀ1 for B and A, respectively. Lastly, it is