COMMUNICATIONS
(1H NMR), was recorded. The aldol product was used in the
next reaction step without further purification.
Note: Exposure to silica gel chromatography often results
in reduced diastereoselectivity and aldol product yield and
is discouraged.
hexanones (5–8) can be used as starting materials.
Furthermore, we have shown that a non-selective
epimer switch occurs and provides the first reasonable
access to either enantiomeric form of a new relative
stereochemistry for these aldol products. Their con-
version to the corresponding acetonide (four stereo-
genic centers) and lactone (three stereogenic centers)
products represents the first realistic starting point for
their planned use in target-based synthesis. Further-
more, no other approaches, e.g., transition metal-
mediated or enzyme-based, can currently surpass the
organocatalyzed reaction results regardless of the de-
sired stereochemical outcome (type I-IV).
Finally from a catalysis perspective, we have taken
an obscure chemical observation, low yields of type
III aldol product formation,[14b,c] to a level where it
can now be imagined that a selective epimer switch,
at the remote stereogenic center of these aldol prod-
ucts, is within reach via rational catalyst design. This
is significant because there are no known step effi-
cient replacements for the formation of these epimer-
ic products.
Acknowledgements
This work was generously supported by the Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft (German Science Foundation) under
award no. NU 235/6-1, and Jacobs University Bremen. We
are very thankful for low and high resolution MS measure-
ments provided by Professor Dr. Nikolai Kuhnert. IH thanks
the Higher Education Commission and Hazara University
Mansehra, KPK Pakistan for award grant number: F.No.HU/
PQDP/2012/194.
References
[1] a) T. C. Nugent, M. El-Shazly, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010,
352, 753–819; b) M. R. Monaco, G. Pupo, B. List, Syn-
lett 2016, 27, 1027–1040; c) F. Huang, Z. Liu, Z. Yu,
Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 872–885; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2016, 55, 862–875.
Experimental Section
[2] For a broader discussion of site-selectivity, see: P. M.
Tadross, E. N. Jacobsen, Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 963–965.
[3] a) J. Zhou, B. List, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7498–
7499; b) J. Zhou, V. Wakchaure, P. Kraft, B. List,
Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 7677–7886; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7656–7658; c) R. C. Simon, B. Gri-
schek, F. Zepeck, A. Steinreiber, F. Belaj, W. Kroutil,
Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 6817–6820; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6713–6716; d) M. Skoupi, C. Vaxe-
laire, C. Strohmann, M. Christmann, C. M. Niemeyer,
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8701–8705; e) T. C. Nugent,
F. T. Najafian, H. A. E. D. Hussein, I. Hussain, Chem.
Eur. J. 2016, 22, 14342–14348.
[4] A single example of double aldol site-selectivity has
been demonstrated, see Table 2, entry 8, compound 3h
(10 mol% catalyst loading, 67% yield, 9:1 dr, 81% ee)
within: Y. Shimoda, T. Kubo, M. Sugiura, S. Kotani, M.
Nakajima, Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 3545–3548; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3461–3464.
Experimental Details
Altogether112 pages of detailed Supporting Information are
associated with this manuscript.
General Procedure for Aldol Products (9 and 10)
To a dry 2.0-mL screw-cap reaction vial were added dike-
tone (1.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), aldehyde (0.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv.)
and (S)- or (R)-PicAm 1 as a 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic
acid 1:1 salt (MW=550.58 gmolÀ1, 0.05 mmol, 10.0 mol%,
27.5 mg). After stirring for 5 min distilled water (0.50 mL)
was added. This reaction mixture was then stirred and
heated at 458C until a starting material conversion of
ꢀ95% was noted unless otherwise stated. Reaction progress
was monitored by aliquots (1H NMR). Reaction conversion
was determined by integrating the aldehydic resonance (sin-
glet, ꢁ10.0 ppm) versus the combined integration of the
benzylic proton resonance (doublets, both found between
4.50–5.50 ppm) of the syn- and anti-aldol products. Reaction
times ranged from 25–69 h, see the individual descriptions
for the specific reaction time.
Note: Extending the reaction time often results in de-
creased diastereoselectivity through a-keto epimerization.
Reaction work-up: The reaction mixture was transferred
to a separatory funnel containing distilled water (25–35 mL)
by excessive extractive addition of CH2Cl2 (9ꢅ1.5 mL) to
the reaction vessel. After this initial extraction from water,
the water was further extracted with CH2Cl2 (6ꢅ20 mL).
Combined organic extract was dried (Na2SO4), filtered and
concentrated (rotary evaporator bath temperature should
not exceed 288C to minimize the risk of a-keto epimeriza-
tion). The crude aldol product was then exposed to high
vacuum drying and after 2–3 h the dr, anti/syn ratio
[5] Triketone site-selectivity coincidentally represents the
foundation of modern amine catalysis, namely the
Hajos–Parrish–Eder–Sauer–Wiechert
intramolecular
aldol cyclizations under proline catalysis, see: a) U.
Eder, G. Sauer, R. Wiechert, Angew. Chem. 1971, 83,
492; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1971, 10, 496;
b) Z. G. Hajos, D. R. Parrish, J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39,
1615–1621.
[6] For literature overviews of triketones, see: a) S. Mu-
kherjee, J. W. Yang, S. Hoffmann, B. List, Chem. Rev.
2007, 107, 5471–5569; b) B. Bradshaw, J. Bonjoch, Syn-
lett 2012, 23, 337–356.
[7] K. Sakthivel, W. Notz, T. Bui, C. F. Barbas III, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5260–5267.
[8] For the synthesis of the picolyl amine (PicAm) 1, see:
T. C. Nugent, A. Bibi, A. Sadiq, M. Shoaib, M. Umar,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 0000, 000, 0 – 0
7
ꢂ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!