ChemComm
Communication
place with only a low enantioselectivity. This low selectivity was
not surprising based on the results found by van Maarseveen and
co-workers for the intermolecular amination with primary aniline
by using Ph-pybox.6
In summary, we have disclosed the copper-catalyzed intra-
molecular propargylic amination of propargylic acetates bear-
ing an amine moiety at a suitable position to give optically
active 1-ethynyl-isoindolines. In the present reaction system,
copper–pybox complexes have been found to work as effective
catalysts toward the propargylic amination (up to 98% ee). We
believe that the present method provides a useful synthetic
approach to the enantioselective preparation of optically active
nitrogen containing heterocyclic compounds with an ethynyl
group at the a-position with a high enantioselectivity as an
application of the copper-catalyzed propargylic amination.
Further studies on the transition metal-catalyzed propargylic
substitution reactions are currently in progress.
Scheme 3
Fig. 2 Copper–allenylidene complex as a key reactive intermediate.
Notes and references
1 For reviews, see: (a) M. Chrzanowska and M. D. Rozwadowska,
Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 3341; (b) Y.-G. Zhou, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007,
40, 1357; (c) S. Anas and H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2009,
20, 2193; (d) M. Ahamed and M. H. Todd, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010,
that the intramolecular amination also proceeds via a similar
reaction pathway. The absolute configuration at the propargylic
position in 2 indicates that the intramolecular attack of an
amino group on the cationic g-carbon in I occurs from the Si
face (Fig. 2).
´
5935; (e) V. Sridharan, P. A. Suryavanshi and J. C. Menendez, Chem.
Rev., 2011, 111, 7157.
The successful results of the intramolecular cyclic amina-
tion prompted us to investigate double propargylic amination
including sequential inter- and intra-molecular amination
(Scheme 4). The reaction of 1,10-(1,2-phenylene)-bis(prop-2-
yne-1,1-diyl) diacetate (3) with aniline in methanol at room
temperature in the presence of 5 mol% of CuOTfꢀ1/2(C6H6) and
10 mol% of L5 proceeded smoothly to give 1,3-di(ethynyl)-2-
phenylisoindoline (4a) in 70% yield as a mixture of two diaster-
eoisomers (meso-isomer/DL-isomer = 5/1) (Scheme 4(a)). The
minor DL-isomer was obtained with 75% ee. On the other hand,
the reaction of 3 with N,N0-diphenylethane-1,2-diamine under the
same reaction conditions afforded 1,6-diethynyl-2,5-diphenyl-
1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydrobenzo[ f ][1,4]diazocine (4b) in 68% yield as
a mixture of two diastereoisomers (meso-isomer/DL-isomer = 8/1)
(Scheme 4(b)). The minor DL-isomer was obtained with 66% ee.
The low selective formation of DL-isomers in the both reaction
systems indicates that the first intermolecular amination of 3 took
2 For enantioselective synthesis of isoindolines, see: (a) Y. Sato,
T. Nishimata and M. Mori, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 6133;
(b) Y. Sato, T. Nishimata and M. Mori, Heterocycles, 1997, 44, 443;
(c) D. Enders, A. A. Narine, F. Toulgoat and T. Bisschops, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 5661; (d) C. Wang, X.-H. Chen, S.-M. Zhou
and L.-Z. Gong, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 1275; (e) S. Takizawa,
N. Inoue, S. Hirata and H. Sasai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010,
´
´
49, 9725; ( f ) R. Moran-Ramallal, V. Gotor-Fernandez, P. Laborda,
F. J. Sayago, C. Cativiela and V. Gotor, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 1696.
3 For our recent reviews, see: (a) Y. Miyake, S. Uemura and
Y. Nishibayashi, ChemCatChem, 2009, 1, 342; (b) Y. Nishibayashi,
Synthesis, 2012, 489.
4 For recent reviews by other research groups, see: (a) R. J. Detz,
H. Hiemstra and J. H. van Maarseveen, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009,
6263; (b) C.-H. Ding and X.-L. Hou, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 1914;
(c) O. Debleds, E. Gayon, E. Vrancken and J.-M. Campagne, Beilstein
J. Org. Chem., 2011, 7, 866; (d) E. B. Bauer, Synthesis, 2012, 1131.
5 For our recent papers of enantioselective propargylic amination,
see: (a) G. Hattori, H. Matsuzawa, Y. Miyake and Y. Nishibayashi,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3781; (b) G. Hattori, A. Yoshida,
Y. Miyake and Y. Nishibayashi, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 7603;
(c) G. Hattori, Y. Miyake and Y. Nishibayashi, ChemCatChem, 2010,
2, 155; (d) G. Hattori, K. Sakata, H. Matsuzawa, Y. Tanabe, Y. Miyake and
Y. Nishibayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 10592; (e) A. Yoshida,
M. Ikeda, G. Hattori, Y. Miyake and Y. Nishibayashi, Org. Lett., 2011,
13, 592; ( f ) A. Yoshida, G. Hattori, Y. Miyake and Y. Nishibayashi, Org.
Lett., 2011, 13, 2460.
6 For recent papers of enantioselective propargylic amination reported
by van Maarseveen and co-workers, see: (a) R. J. Detz,
M. M. E. Delville, H. Hiemstra and J. H. van Maarseveen, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3777; (b) R. J. Detz, Z. Abiri, R. le Griel,
H. Hiemstra and J. H. van Maarseveen, Chem. – Eur. J., 2011, 17, 5921.
7 For recent papers of enantioselective propargylic amination
reported by other research groups, see: (a) C. Zhang, Y.-H. Wang,
X.-H. Hu, Z. Zheng, J. Xu and X.-P. Hu, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2012,
354, 2854; (b) T. Mino, H. Taguchi, M. Hashimoto and M. Sakamoto,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2013, 24, 1520.
8 (R)-Cl-MeO-biphep = (R)-5,50-dichloro-6,60-dimethoxy-2,20-bis(diphenyl-
phosphino)-1,10-biphenyl: (a) R. R. Huddleston, H.-Y. Jang and
M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11488; (b) H.-Y. Jang,
F. W. Hughes, H. Gong, J. Zhang, J. S. Brodbelt and M. J. Krische, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 6174; (c) J. U. Rhee and M. J. Krische, J. Am.
Scheme 4
7876 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 7874--7877
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014