Published on Web 08/10/2010
A Healable Supramolecular Polymer Blend Based on Aromatic
π-π Stacking and Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions
Stefano Burattini,† Barnaby W. Greenland,† Daniel Hermida Merino,†
Wengui Weng,‡ Jonathan Seppala,‡ Howard M. Colquhoun,*,† Wayne Hayes,*,†
Michael E. Mackay,‡ Ian W. Hamley,† and Stuart J. Rowan§
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AD, U.K.,
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, UniVersity of Delaware, Newark,
Delaware 19716, and Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western
ReserVe UniVersity, 2100 Adelbert Road, CleVeland, Ohio 44106
Received May 23, 2010; E-mail: h.m.colquhoun@reading.ac.uk; w.c.hayes@reading.ac.uk
Abstract: An elastomeric, healable, supramolecular polymer blend comprising a chain-folding polyimide
and a telechelic polyurethane with pyrenyl end groups is compatibilized by aromatic π-π stacking between
the π-electron-deficient diimide groups and the π-electron-rich pyrenyl units. This interpolymer interaction
is the key to forming a tough, healable, elastomeric material. Variable-temperature FTIR analysis of the
bulk material also conclusively demonstrates the presence of hydrogen bonding, which complements the
π-π stacking interactions. Variable-temperature SAXS analysis shows that the healable polymeric blend
has a nanophase-separated morphology and that the X-ray contrast between the two types of domain
increases with increasing temperature, a feature that is repeatable over several heating and cooling cycles.
A fractured sample of this material reproducibly regains more than 95% of the tensile modulus, 91% of the
elongation to break, and 77% of the modulus of toughness of the pristine material.
1. Introduction
ent monomers in the system can often be precisely controlled
by application of a suitable external stimulus such as heat5 or
light.6 This may in turn enable a specific physical property of
the polymer, such as its tensile strength, to be modulated rapidly.
Upon removal of the external stimulus, the properties of the
material can return to those it possessed in its original state.
This “switchable” behavior of supramolecular polymers has been
demonstrated in applications as diverse as adhesives, coatings,
and most recently, healable materials.7
The large and still-growing range of areas in which supramo-
lecular materials may find application is driven by the wide
range of molecular components from which they may be
constructed. In recent years, supramolecular polymers that
exploit hydrogen bonding,2,4,8 nucleobase stacking,3b metal-ligand
interations,2,9 and hydrophobic effects,10 among others, have
Self-assembled polymeric materials have been developed and
studied intensively over the past decade.1 Such materials
typically comprise low- to medium-molecular-weight species
capable of strong, directed, supramolecular interactions2 that
impart physical properties, such as high solution viscosity and
tensile strength, that are more traditionally associated with
covalently bonded, high-molecular-weight polymers.3 Self-
assembled polymers are typically stimuli-responsive,4 and the
strength of the supramolecular interactions between the constitu-
† University of Reading.
‡ University of Delaware.
§ Case Western Reserve University.
(1) (a) Ciferri, A. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 511–529. (b)
Swiegers, G. F.; Malefetse, T. J. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3483–3538.
(c) Schmuck, C.; Wienand, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4363–
4369. (d) Hofmeier, H.; Schubert, U. S. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33,
373–399. (e) Hoeben, F. J. M.; Jonkheijm, P.; Meijer, E. W.;
Schenning, A. P. H. J. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1491–1546. (f) Perez-
Garcia, L.; Amabilino, D. B. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 941–967. (g)
Fox, J. D.; Rowan, S. J. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6823–6835.
(2) (a) Ciferri, A. Supramolecular Polymers; Marcel Dekker: New York,
2000. (b) Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma,
R. P. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 4071–4097. (c) ten Cate, A. T.; Sijbesma,
R. P. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 1094–1112. (d) Sivakova,
S.; Rowan, S. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2005, 34, 9–21.
(5) (a) Burattini, S.; Colquhoun, H. M.; Fox, J. D.; Friedmann, D.;
Greenland, B. W.; Harris, P. J. F.; Hayes, W.; Mackay, M. E.; Rowan,
S. J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6717–6719. (b) Burattini, S.; Colquhoun,
H. M.; Greenland, B. W.; Hayes, W. Faraday Discuss. 2009, 143,
247–264.
(6) Tomatsu, I.; Hashidzume, A.; Harada, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 2226–2227.
(7) (a) Bergman, S. D.; Wudl, F. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 41–62. (b)
Wu, D. Y.; Meure, S.; Solomon, D. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2008, 33, 479–
522. (c) Wool, R. P. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 400–418. (d) Burattini, S.;
Greenland, B. W.; Chappell, D.; Colquhoun, H. M.; Hayes, W. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2010, 39, 1973–1985.
(3) (a) Sijbesma, R. P.; Beijer, F.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.;
Hirschberg, J. H. K. K.; Lange, R. F. M.; Lowe, J. K. L.; Meijer,
E. W. Science 1997, 278, 1601–1604. (b) Sivakova, S.; Bohnsack,
D. A.; Mackay, M. E.; Suwanmala, P.; Rowan, S. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 18202–18211. (c) Sontjens, S. H. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.;
Van Genderen, M. H. P.; Meijer, E. W. Macromolecules 2001, 34,
3815–3818. (d) Sontjens, S. H. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Genderen,
M. H. P.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7487–7493.
(4) Cordier, P.; Tournilhac, F.; Soulie´-Ziakovic, C.; Leibler, L. Nature
2008, 451, 977–980.
(8) Hirschberg, J. H. K. K.; Brunsveld, L.; Ramzi, A.; Vekemans,
J. A. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W. Nature 2000, 147, 167–
170.
(9) Beck, J. B.; Ineman, J. M.; Rowan, S. J. Macromolecules 2005, 38,
5060–5068.
(10) Kretschmann, O.; Choi, S. W.; Miyauchi, M.; Tomatsu, I.; Harada,
A.; Ritter, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4361–4365.
9
10.1021/ja104446r 2010 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2010, 132, 12051–12058 12051