VISIBLE-LIGHT-DRIVEN PHOTOCATALYSIS of Gd-DOPED ZnO
1601
served as an efficient scavenger to trap photo-gener- source. All the XPS spectra were calibrated w.r.t. a C
ated electrons [16].
1s electron peak at 285.1 eV.
The photocatalytic activities of the as-synthesized
ZnO and Gd-doped ZnO samples with different con-
tents of Gd dopant were monitored by measuring the
photodegradation of methylene blue (MB) solution
under visible light radiation of a Xe lamp. Each 200 mg of
In this work, Gd-doped ZnO samples with differ-
ent concentrations of Gd dopant were synthesized by
the tartaric acid assisted precipitation method. The
structure, morphology and atomic vibration of pure
ZnO and Gd-doped ZnO samples were studied by
X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, transmis-
sion electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photo-
electron spectroscopy (XPS). The photocatalytic
properties of pure ZnO and Gd-doped ZnO samples
were investigated by photodegradation of methylene
blue (MB) under visible light of Xe lamp.
–5
the photocatalysts was suspended in 200 mL 1 × 10
M
MB solutions. The suspended solutions were stirred in
the dark condition for 30 min to stabilize the adsorp-
tion-desorption equilibrium of MB on the surface of
photocatalyst. Then, a visible light of Xe lamp was
turned on to irradiate on the suspended solution with
keeping the light on until 45 min completion. The
photodegradation of MB was examined for analytical
samples taken out from the photoreactor at regular
time intervals, centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min to
remove photocatalyst. The concentration of MB solu-
EXPERIMENTAL
Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO ) · 6H O), gad- tion was measured by PerkinElmer, Lambda 25 UV-
3
2
2
olinium nitrate hexahydrate (Gd(NO ) · 6H O) as visible spectrometer at λ of 664 nm wavelength. The
3
3
2
max
zinc and gadolinium sources, tartaric acid (C H O ) decolorization efficiency (%) of MB by the photocat-
4
6
6
and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were purchased from alyst was calculated by
Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Corporation and used with-
out further purification.
C − C
0
t
Decolorization efficiency
( )
%
=
×100, (1)
C0
Each 0.01ꢀmol Zn(NO ) · 6H O and 0–5 wt %
3
2
2
where C and C are the absorbance of MB solutions
Gd(NO ) · 6H O were dissolved in 50 mL C H OH
0
t
3
3
2
2
5
before and after visible light irradiation. In the end, the
degraded products of the photocatalytic system were
investigated by direct mass spectrometry (Agilent
G6545A Q-TOF LC/MS) using an electrospray ion-
solutions with 30ꢀmin stirring and mixed together
under continued stirring. Subsequently, 0.0100 mole
tartaric acid solution in 50 mL C H OH solvent was
2
5
added to the mixed solution at room temperature, and
followed by 20 mL of 1 M NaOH solution adding with
continued stirring for 30 min. The as-synthesized
white precipitates were filtered, washed by distilled
water and ethanol several times, dried at 80°C for 24ꢀh
and ground into fine powder. The 2.00 g fine powder
was put in an alumina crucible and calcined in air at
+
ization operating in the positive (ESI ) mode for the
treated MB. At the end of photocatalysis, the mass to
charge (m/z) ratio of the degraded products was also
investigated by mass spectroscopy.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
600°C for 2ꢀh.
The degree of crystallinity and phase of as-pre-
pared ZnO and Gd-doped ZnO samples were studied
by XRD as the results shown in Fig. 1. The XRD pat-
tern of pure ZnO without Gd dopant revealed five dif-
fraction peaks at 2θ of 31.78°, 34.42°, 36.27°, 47.55°
and 56.60° which were assigned to the (100), (002),
Phase and structure of ZnO and Gd-doped ZnO
samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction
(
XRD) on a Rigaku SmartLab X-ray diffractometer
equipped with CuK radiation ranging from 20° to 60°
α
at a scanning rate of 0.005 deg/s. The morphology of
ZnO and Gd-doped ZnO samples was recorded by
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on a JEOL,
(
101), (102) and (110) planes of wurtzite hexagonal
ZnO (JCPDS no. 36-1451 [18]). The sharp diffraction
peaks in the XRD pattern of ZnO sample indicated
JEM 2010 TEM with LaB as electron gun at an accel-
6
eration voltage of 200 kV. The molecular vibration was that ZnO was highly crystallized in nature. Neverthe-
measured by Raman spectroscopy and Fourier trans- less, the XRD patterns of as-prepared 1, 3 and 5 wt %
form infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Raman spectra Gd-doped ZnO samples were still the same diffraction
–1
were operated in the wavenumber of 100–800 cm
patterns as the pattern of ZnO sample. The impurity
, Gd(OH) were not detected in
Yvon Raman spectrometer using a 50 mW and 514.5 nm these XRD patterns, indicating that Gd ions were
–1
with 0.1 cm resolution on a T64000 HORIBA Jobin phases such as Gd
O
2
3
3
3+
2+
wavelength Ar green laser. FTIR spectra were operated
uniformly substituted for Zn ions. The addition of
–1
in the wavenumber of 400–4000 cm on Bruker Ten- Gd ions to ZnO matrix had no effect in shifting the
sor 27 using KBr as a diluting agent. X-ray photoelec- XRD peaks of ZnO [15, 19]. They can be seen that the
tron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out by an Axis increasing content of Gd dopant in ZnO matrix, the
Ultra DLD│Kratos–Kratos Analytical with a mono- diffraction peaks of Gd-doped ZnO were broadened.
chromatic AlK radiation (1486.6 eV) as a providing These led to reduce the particle size of Gd-doped ZnO
α
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 64 No. 12 2019