C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
the one observed in the solid state for the cluster after grinding (λmax
)
580 nm) compared to the crystalline one (λmax ) 530 nm) and which
shows a similar luminescence thermochromic behavior to that of the
crushed solid. Thus, the mechanochromism luminescence observed
in this study seems to be related to cuprophilic interactions. This is
not surprising since most of the mechanochromic luminescent transi-
tion-metal complexes reported in the literature involve modulation of
7-11
aurophilic interactions.
4 4
In order to explain the origin of the modification of the [Cu I ]
core and thus of the Cu-Cu interactions, the crystalline structure
of the pristine powder has been analyzed in detail. However, no
intermolecular interactions directly involving the [Cu I ] core are
4 4
observed. Despite the presence of numerous phenyl groups in the
crystal structure, no typical π-π stacking interactions exist either.
Only several short CH · · ·H contacts involving the allyl groups of
ligands are detected (2.85 Å in Figure S7). This suggests that the
mechanical constraints induced by the grinding modify these
interligand interactions leading to a different cluster packing in the
crushed compound. These local distortions allow the relaxation of
Figure 4. Solid-state luminescence spectra of (a) uncrushed and (b) crushed
Cu (PPh (CH CHdCH )) ] recorded between 275 and 8 K.
[
I
4 4
2
2
2
4
the crystalline phase is also present in the spectrum of the crushed
compound at low temperature, in accordance with the remaining
crystalline cluster shown by the PXRD analysis.
4 4 2 2 2 4
Thus, the [Cu I (PPh (CH CHdCH )) ] cluster presents two
emission bands (LE and HE) with temperature dependent intensities,
particularly evident for the crushed compound. For the crystalline
cluster, it appears that the LE emission is somehow quenched as
its intensity is very low and does not increase upon heating. In this
case, the two different excited states (XLCT and CC) seem to be
not coupled anymore with independent population of the two states.
However, upon grinding, the LE emission is no longer quenched
and a thermal activated mechanism seems to be recovered with
possible energy transfer between the two excited states (this is even
more evident when luminescence spectra are recorded at λex ) 315
nm as shown in Figure S6). By exhibiting the typical thermochromic
luminescence of copper iodide clusters, this study constitutes another
4 4
the [Cu I ] core, which is probably sterically constrained in the
crystalline phase, and drastically modify the luminescence proper-
ties. This phenomenon clearly appears as a competition between
the crystalline cohesion and the intracluster interactions. Note that
this copper cluster is the first compound presenting both mecha-
nochromic and thermochromic luminescence, and further photo-
physical studies combined with structural analysis are currently in
progress to confirm our mechanism assumption.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank C. Roch (Institut Lavoisier
de Versailles UMR 8180 CNRS-Universit e´ de Versailles Saint-
Quentin en Yvelines) for the DSC measurements.
confirmation of the preservation of the [Cu
in the yellow emissive crushed compound.
4 4 4
I L ] cubane structure
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
the cluster synthesis, characterization data, and single crystal X-ray
diffraction crystallographic file (CIF format). This material is available
free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Table 1. Luminescence Properties of [Cu
4
I
4
(PPh
2
(CH
2
2 4
CHdCH )) ]
a
before and after Grinding
em
λ
max (nm)
ex
4 4 2 2 2 4
[Cu I (PPh (CH CHdCH )) ]
HE
LE
λ
max (nm)
References
uncrushed
crushed
8 K
440 (1)
-
470 (1)
-
-
360
360-315
360-315-270
360-315
(1) Fernandez-Moreira, V.; Thorp-Greenwood, F. L.; Coogan, M. P. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 186–202.
2
75 K
8 K
75 K
530 (0.04)
580 (0.4)
580 (1.1)
(2) Kamtekar, K. T.; Monkman, A. P.; Bryce, M. R. AdV. Mater. 2010, 22,
5
72–582.
2
(
3) Beyer, M. K.; Clausen-Schaumann, H. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2921–2948.
(
4) Bouas-Laurent, H.; Durr, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 639–665.
a
For each compound, the relative intensities for the HE and LE
emission bands are reported in brackets.
(5) Sagara, Y.; Kato, T. Nature Chem. 2009, 1, 605–610.
(6) Balch, A. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2641–2644. and references
therein.
(
7) Ito, H.; Saito, T.; Oshima, N.; Kitamura, N.; Ishizaka, S.; Hinatsu, Y.;
Wakeshima, M.; Kato, M.; Tsuge, K.; Sawamura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 10044–10045.
Cu-Cu interactions have been reported as influencing the lumi-
nescence properties of the cooper iodide clusters and particularly the
LE emission band. Indeed, the position of the LE band has been
directly related to the Cu-Cu distances in [Cu
DFT calculations, the Cu-Cu interactions in the excited state (LUMO)
are of bonding character. As the Cu-Cu distances become shorter,
the bonding character increases, the energy level is lowered, and thus
the LE emission band shifts to a longer wavelength. This effect is
observed in our case, with λem ) 530 nm for the crystalline cluster
and 580 nm for the crushed one. This shift suggests that in the crushed
state the cluster has shorter Cu-Cu distances. This hypothesis is
supported by the surprising long Cu-Cu distances observed in the
molecular structure of the cluster which can originate from packing
18
(8) Lee, Y.-A.; Eisenberg, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7778–7779.
(9) Schneider, J.; Lee, Y.-A.; P e´ rez, J.; Brennessel, W. W.; Flaschenriem, C.;
20
4 4
I
] derivatives. From
Eisenberg, R. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47 (3), 957–968.
(
10) Catalano, V. J.; Horner, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42 (25), 8430–8438.
11) Assefa, Z.; A. Omary, M.; McBurnett, B. G.; Mohamed, A. A.; Patterson,
H. H.; Staples, R. J.; Fackler, J. P. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41 (24), 6274–
(
6
280.
(
(
(
12) Laguna, A.; Lasanta, T.; Lopez-de-Luzuriaga, J. M.; Monge, M.; Naumov,
P.; Olmos, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 456–457.
13) Mizukami, S.; Houjou, H.; Sugaya, K.; Koyama, E.; Tokuhisa, H.; Sasaki,
T.; Kanesato, M. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 50–56.
14) Tsukuda, T.; Kawase, M.; Dairiki, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Tsubomura, T. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 1905–1907.
(
(
15) Abe, T.; Itakura, T.; Ikeda, N.; Shinozaki, K. Dalton Trans. 2009, 711–715.
16) Tard, C.; Perruchas, S.; Maron, S.; Le Goff, X. F.; Guillen, F.; Garcia, A.;
Vigneron, J.; Etcheberry, A.; Gacoin, T.; Boilot, J.-P. Chem. Mater. 2008,
2
0, 7010–7016.
4 4
constraints. Thus, after grinding, some clusters could present [Cu I ]
cores with shorter Cu-Cu distances, allowing the recovery of the
(
17) Hardt, H. D.; Pierre, A. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1973, 402, 107–112.
(18) Ford, P. C.; Cariati, E.; Bourasssa, J. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 3625–3647.
(
(
19) Vega, A.; Saillard, J.-Y. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 4012–4018.
20) Kim, T. H.; Shin, Y. W.; Jung, J. H.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 685–688.
typical thermochromic luminescence properties observed for this cluster
21
family. The ‘relaxation’ of the Cu-Cu interactions in the crushed
compound is also suggested by the cluster emission in solution (λmax
(
21) Radjaipour, M.; Oelkrug, D. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1978, 82, 159–163.
)
615 nm in Figure S5) which takes place at a wavelength closer to
JA103431D
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 32, 2010 10969