prevents the occurrence of the initial hydrogen abstraction
step. This is consistent with the fact that no color change
Table 2. Study of DDQ-Assisted C-C Bond-Forming
(indicating no charge-transfer complex was formed) was
Reaction with 5-Alkoxymethyl and
a
observed when DDQ was added to the substrate.
5-Phenoxymethyl-benzo[1,3]dioxole
From the resonance structure, the electron-donating group
at the para position will provide a stronger stabilizing
3
a,8
effect.
The data in Table 1 support this principle. The
reactions of compounds 6c, 6d, and 6e, all possessing a para-
methoxy group, with trimethyl-(1-phenyl-vinyloxy)-silane
worked well to give products 8c, 8d, and 8e, respectively,
in moderate yields. The lower yield obtained for compound
8
b can be attributed to the less reactive starting material 6b
possessing two methoxy groups at the meta position of the
benzene ring. It is interesting to observe that in the case of
5
-methoxymethyl-benzo[1,3]dioxole (6f), the reaction with
DDQ followed by trimethyl-(1-phenyl-vinyloxy)-silane pro-
9
vided product 8f in the highest yield.
The next area that was explored for this C-C bond-
forming reaction concerned the “R” group attached to the
benzylic “O” atom. As shown in Table 2, 5-alkoxymethyl-
benzo[1,3]dioxole was used to study the effect of the “R”
group in this coupling reaction because of the high yield
achieved with this particular substrate. Following the typical
protocol described earlier, the reaction of 5-tert-butoxy-
methyl-benzo[1,3]dioxole (9a) with trimethyl-(1-phenyl-
vinyloxy)-silane did not produce any product 10a. Both
starting materials, however, were consumed, indicating that
the reaction might proceed via a different pathway. Replacing
the tert-butyl group by a cyclohexyl group, as in 5-cyclo-
hexyloxymethyl-benzo[1,3]dioxole 9b, worked very well in
this DDQ-assisted C-C bond-forming reaction and afforded
the coupling product 10b in 85% isolated yield. In a sharp
contrast to these data, the reaction of similar phenyl analogue
a
All reactions were carried out in anhydrous conditions at room
temperature under nitrogen pressure with 0.1 M solution of compound 6 or
in CH2Cl2. Anhydrous dichloromethane purchased from Aldrich in aSure/
Seal bottle was used. Performed with about 0.2-0.5 equiv of LiClO4. All
products were characterized by H NMR, MS, and elemental analysis.
b
9
c
d
1
e
Isolated yield after flash chromatography separation.
9c with the same silyl enol ether 7 did not produce the desired
product 10c.
A plausible mechanism was proposed in trying to explain
the results in Table 2. The DDQ-assisted hydrogen abstrac-
tion from benzyl ether leads to the formation of a cationic
intermediate 11. The relative stability of 11 is critical in
4
The addition of LiClO is important for improving the
efficiency for the coupling reaction. It is postulated that the
-
ClO
4
can undergo exchange of counterion with the charge-
transfer complex 4 to form a new ion pair. Such a new ion
pair usually serves as a better electrophile than the charge-
(
7) (a) Becker, H. In The Chemistry of Quinoid Compounds; Patai, S.,
6
transfer complex 4. Without LiClO
4
additive, the same
Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1974; p 335. (b) Becker, H.; Turner, A. B. In The
Chemistry of Quinoid Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Ed.; Wiley:
New York, 1988; Vol. II, p 1351.
reaction as indicated in Scheme 2 afforded product 8 in lower
chemical yield (45%).
(
8) Oikawa, Y.; Horita, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Tanaka, T.; Yonemitsu, O.
Tetrahedron 1986, 41, 3021-3028.
9) A detailed typical reaction procedure for benzyl ether 6f and silyl
enol ether 7 is as follows: To a stirred solution of compound 6f (404 mg,
To understand the scope of this interesting reaction, we
first tried to probe the electronic effect of the benzyl ring.
Treatment of unsubstituted benzyl methyl ether 6a with DDQ
and followed by addition of silyl enol ether 7 did not yield
any product 8a (Table 1). In this case, the starting material
(
2
4
2
.43 mmol) in 10 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane was added activated
Å molecular sieves (200 mg). After 15 min of stirring, DDQ (662 mg,
.91 mmol) and LiClO4 (55 mg, 0.52 mmol) were added. The stirring was
continued for 60 min, then trimethyl-(1-phenyl-vinyloxy)-silane (561 mg,
2.91 mmol) was added. After 1 h, 5% NaHCO3 solution (25 mL) and
dichloromethane (15 mL) were added. The organic layer was separated,
and the aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 15 mL).
The combined organic layer was dried, filtered, and evaporated. The residue
was purified by flash chromatography to give compound 8f (580 mg, 2.04
mmol) in 84% yield. Compound 8f: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94
6a was fully recovered. It is believed that the initial hydrogen
abstraction from the benzylic position to form the charge-
transfer complex is the rate-limiting step. Electron-donating
substituents such as a methoxy group can stabilize the
benzylic cationic species7,8 and hence will promote the
desired C-C bond-forming process. In the simple benzylic
case, the absence of such a stabilizing substitution group
(
2H, m), 7.53 (1H, m), 7.44 (2H, m), 6.93 (2H, m), 6.84 (1H, d, J ) 8.8
Hz), 4.81 (1H, dd, J ) 8.4, 4.4 Hz), 3.91 (3H, s), 3.88 (3H, s), 3.58 (1H,
1
3
dd, J ) 16.3, 8.4 Hz), 3.24 (3H, s), 3.10 (1H, dd, J ) 16.3, 4.4 Hz);
NMR (CDCl3) δ 197.37 (C), 148.93 (C), 148.34 (C), 136.65 (C), 133.67
CH), 132.82 (C), 133.01 (CH), 128.29 (2 x CH), 127.96 (2 x CH), 118.90
C
(
(
6) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Murakami, M. Chem. Lett. 1984,
(CH), 110.84 (CH), 109.14 (CH), 79.32 (CH), 56.66 (CH3), 55.85 (CH3),
55.81 (CH3), 47.14 (CH); HRMS for C18H20O4 calcd 284.1049, found
284.1055.
1
1
759-1762. (b) Hayashi, Y.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1987, 1811-
814.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 10, 2004
1525