4
R. Teodoro et al. / Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters xxx (2018) xxx–xxx
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) Trimethylorthoformate, H2SO4 (cat.), MeOH, 14 d, 22 °C (10a, 57% [from 6a]); (b) Pd2(dba)3, r-BINAP, Cs2CO3, 7a, toluene, 90 °C, 24 h
(11a, 76%); (c) MeOH/H2O, HCl, 22 °C, 10 min (8a, 99%); (d) Cs2CO3, 7a, toluene, 90–100 °C, 30 h (12a, 78% [from 6a], 12, 38% [from 6d]); (e), Cs2CO3, 7a (2.6 eq), Pd2(dba)3, r-
BINAP, (2h after start of reaction), toluene, 90–100 °C, 48 h (13, 40% [from 6a]).
precursors 9a and 9c for radiofluorination were synthesized using
Buchwald-Hartwig coupling of 5a and 5c with the 1,4-diazabicyclo
[3.2.2]nonane 7a in 58% and 56% yields, respectively.
The incorporation of fluorine in o-, m- and p-positions (8a-c)
resulted in a 4b2 nAChR selectivity ratio over 1000. Whilst the
proposed changes in the cationic center were reported to positively
contribute to the selectivity towards the
4b2 subtype12 as herein
a
In order to assess the effect of the o-substitution on binding
affinities, compounds 12, 12a and 13 were synthesized (Scheme 3).
Although 12a and 13 could be already detected by TLC during the
synthesis of the o-fluorofluoren-9-one 8a, their syntheses were
scaled up to enable binding affinity measurements. Compound
12, which is regioisomeric to 8, was prepared from 6d in 38% yield
and compound 12a from 6a in 38% yield by exploiting the above-
mentioned reactivity of the fluorine at the ortho-position to the
carbonyl group. The 1,7-dihalofluorenone 6d was reacted with
amine 7a under Pd-catalyzed Buchwald-Hartwig conditions to give
the disubstituted derivative 13 in 40% yield.
a
exhibited by 8d (Ki 4b2 ꢁ 10000 nM), the diminished binding affin-
a
ity towards the a7 subtype led to the exclusion of this derivative
for further 18F-labelling.
An overlap in the receptor expression of a7 and a3b4 nAChRs, in
particular within autonomic neurons21,22 makes the investigation
of the selectivity of potential ligands towards this receptor subtype
necessary. As summarized in Table 1, compound 8, 8a-c showed
only a modest Ki 7/Ki selectivity ratio of about 24. The
a3b4
a
a3b4
nAChR binding affinities remained in the same order of magnitude
for the fluoren-9-one 8 (Ki 3b4 = 45.6 3.69 nM) compared to the
a
The a7 nAChR binding affinity and selectivity towards the off-
corresponding non-fluorinated dibenzothiophene (Ki 3b4 = 49.6
a
target receptors
a4b2 and
a
3b4 as well as 5-HT3 is depicted in Table 1
14.7 nM12, Fig. 1B). However, insertion of fluorine (8a-c) resulted
(for methodology see supporting information). The
a
7 nAChR bind-
in an increased a3b4 nAChR affinity in comparison, for example,
ing affinity of the lead 8 (Ki 7 = 1.91 0.01 nM) was sevenfold lower
with their bioisosteres DBT10 and ASEM. Interestingly, for com-
a
than the previously reported by Schrimpf et al. (Ki 7 = 0.28 nM).10
pound 8d (Ki 3b4 = 307 11.30 nM) the deshielded N-methyl group
a
a
Although these values cannot be directly compared due to the pre-
viously discussed impact of assay-related differences on binding
affinities (e.g., radioligand, tissue),13 our findings confirmed the
potential of this tricyclic pharmacophore as a7 nAChR agent. The
of the cationic center greatly contributed to the selectivity towards
the a3b4 subtype in comparison to 8a-c.
The in vitro binding affinity to 5-HT3 was investigated by mea-
suring the percentage of inhibition of binding of [3H]GR65630 at
100 nM test compound. This analysis was performed only for com-
sulfonyl (SO2, Ki 7 = 0.51 0.32 nM)12 to carbonyl (CO) exchange
a
resulted in an approximately fourfold diminished affinity of the
pounds possessing the highest a7 nAChR binding affinity and good
lead 8 (Ki 7 = 1.91 0.01 nM), which is less pronounced than the
nAChR off-target selectivity (8, 8a-c). With the exception of the m-
fluoro substituted derivative 8b (23%), the lead 8 and the fluoro
isomers 8a and 8c exhibited percentages of inhibition in the range
of 50%. These values are in the same order of magnitude as for
ASEM. It is worth noticing that the neither non-specific binding
nor undesirable pharmacological effects due to 5-HT3 binding were
reported in pre-clinical15 and in clinical trials with [18F]ASEM.8,14So
we assume that the likelihood of potential 5-HT3 cross-target
issues for the corresponding radioligands of the fluoren-9-one
derivatives 8a and 8c are rather small.
a
tenfold difference reported for the same matched pair under the
same assay conditions (B vs C, Fig. 1).10 Equivalent binding affinities
(Ki in the range of 1.18–2.09 nM) were found for the o-, m- and
a
7
p-fluoro substituted derivatives 8a-c in comparison to the lead 8.
So we can conclude that the introduction of a fluorine atom at this
part of the molecule does not affect the a7 nAChR binding affinity as
it is for the corresponding dibenzothiophene analogs ASEM
and DBT10. The decrease in binding affinity obtained for 8d
(Ki 7 = 15.4 0.35 nM), where we introduced an azatropane ring
a
instead of the 1,4-diazabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane, corresponds also to
In summary, based on the pronounced a7 nAChR binding affin-
the dibenzothiophene bioisosteres.12
ity and sufficient off-target selectivity the fluoren-9-one deriva-
For compound 12, the isomer of 8, in which the 1,4-diazabicyclo
[3.2.2]nonane is substituted at the o-position, we observed a
tives 8a and 8c were selected for further 18F-labelling.
To directly compare the radiofluorination efficiency of the fluo-
ren-9-ones 8a and 8c with the corresponding bioisosteric diben-
zothiophenes ASEM and DBT10, equivalent reaction conditions to
those applied for the radiosynthesis of [18F]DBT10 were investi-
gated (Table S.1, supporting information).12 The initial screening
was performed with regard to the solvent and the heating mode
(conventional vs microwave) at 120 °C using minimal amount of
the nitro precursors for radiolabeling (9a or 9c ffi 0.8 mg).12,23 The
radiochemical yields were determined via radio-TLC and radio-
HPLC analysis of aliquots taken from the crude reaction mixture
at different time points (up to 15 min) unless stated otherwise.
remarkable loss in binding affinity (Ki 7 = 466 nM). We hypothe-
a
size that this decline could be addressed to a steric hindrance
caused by the proximity of the cationic center to the carbonyl
group which act as hydrogen bond acceptor on the tricyclic phar-
macophore.20 The presence of an electron withdrawing group at
the C-7 position of the tricyclic pharmacophore as in 12a did not
improve the affinity. However, as expected, restoring the 1,4-diaz-
abicyclo[3.2.2]nonane as cationic center at the C-7 (meta-) position
(compound 13) of the tricyclic fluoren-9-one yielded a pronounced
increase in binding affinity (Ki 7 = 16.6 8.41 nM).
a