that are part of the promoters of hormone responsive genes
and activate gene expression in a ligand-dependent manner.
A diverse class of human genetic diseases is associated
with mutations to NHRs, including androgen insensitivity
syndrome (androgen receptor), resistance to thyroid hormone
(RTH, thyroid hormone receptor), diabetes mellitus (peroxi-
some proliferator activated receptor), rickets (VDR), Cush-
ings disease (glucocorticoid receptor), and certain forms of
prostate and breast cancer (androgen and estrogen recep-
tors).7,8 Many of these disease-associated mutations involve
amino acids that lie in and around the hormone binding
pocket and directly affect hormone binding and hormone-
dependent transactivation function.
Recent work from our lab has demonstrated that rational
molecular design can be used to generate a potent and
selective thyroid hormone analogue, which selectively
activates an RTH-associated mutant of TRâ over its R
subtype (TRR), which is associated with cardiac function.9
Efforts to complement other RTH-associated mutations of
TR mutations are currently ongoing. In this study we explore
the generality of our structure-based design approach to
complement mutations in a related NHR family member.
In response to 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3),
the nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) regulates genes
associated with phosphate and calcium homeostasis and bone
maintenance.10,11 Several studies have also demonstrated the
presence of a second membrane-associated 1,25(OH)2D3
receptor, which is responsible for rapid hormone-dependent
responses including stimulating cellular calcium influx and
activation of PKC.12
nuclear receptor mediated 1,25(OH)2D3 responsive pathways.
We envisioned that the recently reported VDR-1,25(OH)2D3
cocrystal structure could provide a basis to rationally design
1,25(OH)2D3 analogues capable of selectively complementing
rickets-associated mutations such as VDR(R274L).14
Very recently, Gardezi et al. have shown that JK-1626-
2, a known 1,25(OH)2D3 analogue, partially restores activity
to VDR(R274L) with 5% of the potency of 1,25(OH)2D3
with VDR(wt).4 This analogue was previously identified as
a potent stimulator of PKC, a membrane receptor associated
response of 1,25(OH)2D3.15
In this study we explore the use of structure-based design
to rationally design 1,25(OH)2D3 analogues which are potent
and selective activators of the rickets-associated mutant
VDR(R274L). To provide insight into the binding mode of
1,25(OH)2D3 in the rickets-associated mutant, a computa-
tional site model representing the VDR(R274L) binding
pocket was constructed in FLO/QXP,16 based on the pub-
lished X-ray coordinates of Moras et al. (Figure 1).14 The
Human Vitamin D-Resistant Rickets (VDRR) is associated
with mutations to the nuclear VDR, which result in high
serum 1,25(OH)2D3 levels and severe bone underdevelop-
ment and alopecia. Presently, over 20 VDR mutations
associated with VDRR have been reported.13 Two of these
mutations, Arg274fLeu and His305fGln, involve residues
that directly contact 1,25(OH)2D3 in the normal ligand-
receptor complex. The Arg274fLeu mutation results in a
net loss of a hydrogen bond to the 1R-hydroxyl of 1,25-
(OH)2D3 and a greater than 1000-fold decrease in hormone-
responsive transactivation compared to “wild-type” receptor,
VDR(wt) (EC50VDR(wt) ) 2nM, EC50VDR(R274L) )
>2000 nM). Patients with weakly refractory forms of
hVDRR are sometimes treatable with supraphysiological
doses of 1,25(OH)2D3; however, very high doses of 1,25-
(OH)2D3 cannot be tolerated clinically, presumably because
they will disrupt the normal homeostatic balance of non-
Figure 1. Comparison of the modeled structure of 1,25(OH)2D3
in VDR(R274L) with the wild-type ligand-receptor complex. (A)
Structure of VDR(wt) with 1,25(OH)2D3 based on cocrystal
structure. (B) Modeled structure of VDR(R274L) with 1,25(OH)2D3.
Arg274fLeu mutation results in the loss of a critical
hydrogen bond that normally exists between the 1R-OH and
the guanidine of Arg274 and opens a substantial hydrophobic
“hole” within the ligand-receptor interface, adjacent to the
position of the 1R-hydroxyl (Figure 1B).
The VDR(R274L) model suggests that hydrophobic func-
tionality in the vicinity of the 1R-OH of 1,25(OH)2D3 may
serve to replace the lost ligand-receptor hydrogen bond with
a favorable “hydrophobic bond”. Twenty candidate com-
pounds were identified as having hydrophobic functionality
of approximately the same size as the hole created by the
ArgfLeu substitution and which could be easily derived
(7) Tenbaum, S.; Baniahmad, A. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997, 29,
1325-1341.
(8) Maslen, G. L.; Williams, T. D.; Lewis, H.; Schafer, A. J.; Chatterjee,
V. K.; O’Rahilly, S. Nature 1999, 402, 880-882.
(9) Ye, H. F.; O’Reilly, K. E.; Koh, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
1521-1522.
(10) Spiess, Y. H.; Price, P. A.; Deftos, J. L.; Manolagas, S. C.
Endcorinology 1986, 18, 1340-1346.
(11) Chen, T. C.; Castillo, L.; Korycka-Dahl, M.; Deluca, H, F. J. Nutr.
1974, 104, 1056-1060.
(14) Rochel, N.; Wurtz, J. M.; Mitschler, A.; Klaholz, B.; Moras, D.
Mol. Cell 2000, 5, 173-179.
(15) Greising, D. M.; Schwartz, Z.; Posner, G. H.; Sylvia, V. L.; Dean,
D. D.; Boyan, B. D. J. Cell Physiol. 1996, 171, 357-367.
(16) McMartin, C.; Bohacek, R. J. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997,
11, 333-344.
(12) Farach-Carson, M. C.; Ridall, A. L. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1998, 31,
729-742.
(13) Malloy, P. J.; Pike, J. W.; Feldman, D. Endocr. ReV. 1999, 20, 156-
188.
3864
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 22, 2002