Q. Li et al. / Catalysis Communications 42 (2013) 68–72
69
F127 (1.0 g) was dissolved in absolute ethanol (20 mL). The resol
precursor solution (20 wt% in ethanol, 6 mL) was added and stirred
for 10 min. Then a solution of Al(NO ) ·9H O (0.75 g) dissolved in
3 3 2
concentration for the Pt/Al
the asymmetric hydrogenation of EOPB. Herein, we used the same
concentration of CD for the Pt/xAM catalysts. Typically, 0.1 g of catalyst,
2
O
3
[21] and Pt/mesoporous carbon [22] in
ethanol (6 mL) was dropped slowly into the above mixture.
Subsequently, acetyl acetone (acac) (0.61 mL) was added (the
molar ratio of acac/Al is 3/1). The mixture was cast onto Petri dishes
after further stirring for 40 min. After the evaporation of the solvent
2
10 mg of CD, 1 mL of EOPB, 25 mL of solvent, 5 MPa of H and a stirring
speed of 700 rpm were used for the reaction. The reaction was
terminated after 1 h and then the products were analyzed by gas
chromatography (Agilent 6890) equipped with capillary chiral column
(CP-ChiraSil-DEX CB 25×0.25 Agilent). The pure (R)-(+)-EHPB was
used as the marker, and external standard method was used for
identifying the major product. The optical yield was expressed as ee
value: ee (%) = ([R] − [S]) / ([R] + [S]) × 100.
After the reaction, the catalyst was separated and washed with fresh
acetic acid. Fresh reactant, CD and acetic acid were added to the reactor
together with the recovered catalyst to carry out the next cycle reaction.
(
6–10 h) at room temperature, the resulting sticky film was
subjected to thermocuring at 373 K for 24 h. The obtained composite
film was scrapped off and cut into pieces, followed by pyrolysis in
tube furnace at 873 K for 3 h under N
ramp rate was 1 K/min). The resulting composite was ground into
powders. A series of samples with different Al -contents were
synthesized and designated as xAl –MC (MC is the abbreviation
of mesoporous carbon, x refers to Al weight content (wt %) in
the Al –MC), which were denoted hereafter as xAM.
2
atmosphere (the temperature
2 3
O
2 3
O
2 3
O
2
O
3
3. Results and discussion
The 5 wt% Pt/xAM catalysts were prepared by impregnation method:
xAM was impregnated with an aqueous solution of platinum precursor
3.1. XRD
2 6
(H PtCl ) and stirred for 5 h. Then the mixture was evaporated to
remove excess water, followed by drying at 373 K for 12 h. The catalyst
precursors were reduced at 873 K in a hydrogen atmosphere before use.
Fig. 2 exhibited the low-angle and wide-angle XRD patterns of the
xAMs and Pt/xAMs. Low-angle XRD patterns of xAMs (Fig. 2a) showed
a resolved diffraction peak at 2θ = 0.6–1.0°, which could be indexed
to the (110) reflection of a 2-D p6mm hexagonal mesostructure.
2
.2. Characterization
Along with the increase in Al
diffraction intensities decreased obviously, suggesting that excess incor-
poration of Al deteriorated the structure regularity of mesoporous
2 3
O content from 5 to 25 wt%, the
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained in a
Panalytical X'Pert-Pro powder X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα
radiation (40 kV, 40 mA). N adsorption–desorption isotherms were
2 3
O
2
carbon. That the very weak diffraction intensity at 2θ = 1.0° of MC
attributed to the shrinkage and collapse of the mesopores after the
removal of F127. In the wide-angle XRD patterns of xAMs (Fig. 2b),
two weak and broad diffraction peaks centered at 22.5° and 43.5°
characteristic of amorphous carbon appeared [23]. No distinct diffrac-
tion peaks assigned to the crystalline alumina phases were observed
from all the curves, indicating that the alumina was of low crystallinity
and highly dispersed in the mesoporous carbon. This probably attribut-
recorded on a Micrometitics ASAP 2020M+C analyzer at 77 K. The
BET method was adopted to calculate the special surface areas using
adsorption data in a relative pressure range from 0.05 to 0.20. The
pore size distributions were derived from the adsorption branches of
isotherms using the BJH model. Transmission electronic microscopy
(
TEM) images were taken on a HITACHI H-7650 electronic microscope
with an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. The exact Pt contents of the
catalysts were measured with an Optima 7000 DV inductively coupled
plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES).
x
ed to the high melting point of Al(acac) (468 K), which decomposed to
2 3
Al O during pyrolysis at 873 K [24]. Without the addition of acac,
aluminum species in the resol could readily migrate, aggregate and
grow during both thermosetting and pyrolysis treatment because of
the low melting point of aluminum nitrate (346 K). As for the decreased
intensity of (100) diffraction peak after Pt loading and reduction at high
temperature of the catalyst (Fig. 2c), it could be attributed to three
points: First, Pt loading led to pore-filling effects that reduce the scatter-
ing contrast between the pores and the framework [25]; Second, high
temperature catalyst reduction somewhat destroyed the mesoporous
2
.3. Catalytic tests
The catalytic properties of Pt/xAM catalysts for asymmetric hydroge-
nation of EOPB to (R)-(+)-ethyl 2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutyrate ((R)-
+)-EHPB) were evaluated in a 100-mL stainless-steel stirred pressure
(
reactor at room temperature. Based on some precedents, about 10 wt%
cinchonidine (CD, relative to the Pt supported catalyst) was the optimal
Fig. 1. Preparation of alumina-carbon composites and 5 wt % Pt/alumina-carbon catalysts.