2974
F. Mazué et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 2972e2980
The known compounds 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 were synthesized as
2.4. Biological methods
previously reported, based on an Arbuzov rearrangement followed
by the HornereEmmonseWadsworth reaction [20]. Compound 4
was prepared by the classic Wittig reaction: 4-methoxybenzyl-
triphosfonium chloride was reacted with 3,5-dimethox-
ybenzaldehyde and BuLi in THF to afford 4. Spectral data of the
known compounds are in perfect agreement with those obtained
previously [20]. Calculated log D values were obtained with ACD/
labs Log D program version 11.
2.4.1. Proliferation and cytotoxicity assays
The human colon carcinoma cell line SW480 was cultured in
RPMI-Medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics.
Proliferation inhibition assays were performed in 24-well plates in
triplicate, and each experiment was conducted three times. In all,
30,000 cells were seeded per well and after 24 h were treated with
media containing either 0.1% dimethylsulfoxide with (E)-resvera-
trol, or with resveratrol derivatives, or with 0.1% dimethylsulfoxide
as control. After 24, 48, and 72 h, adherent cells collected by
trypsinization and detached cells were labeled in 1 mL medium
2.2. Photo-isomerization
containing 1 mg/mL of propidium iodide. Cells were counted using
Irradiation experiments were conducted in a 200-mL quartz
a Cyflow green flow cytometer (Partec, Münster). Dead cells were
distinguished from viable cells by incorporation of propidium
iodide. Subsequently, 48h IC50 values were determined by per-
vessel using a Rayonet photochemical reactor equipped with
a variable number of “black light” phosphor lamps with emission in
the 310 to 390nm range and a maximum at 350 nm. The fluence
forming 1 nMe100
mM treatments and the IC50 values were
ꢀ2
rate at the irradiation position was measured to be 5 mW$cm . A
obtained after parametric regressions on the percentages of viable
cells versus the control.
ꢀ
4
2
ꢁ 10 M solution (200 mL) of each compound (1, 3, 7, and 11) in
ethanol was irradiated in the reactor for 10 min under nitrogen
bubbling. The irradiated solution was then reduced to a small
volume under vacuum and charged onto the appropriate silica gel
column to separate the (Z)-product from the residual (E)-isomer. All
photo-isomerizations were obtained with 78e82% conversion,
2.4.2. Cell cycle and DNA content analysis and microscopic
examination of cell nuclei morphology
See the techniques previously used in [12e14].
1
based on H NMR measurements. Spectral data of the 2, 4, 8, and 12
2.5. Computational docking studies
compounds obtained are in perfect agreement with those previ-
ously reported [17,21e23].
In view of the structural similarities of (Z)-polymethoxy stil-
benes with combretastatin, we also investigated the binding model
of all (E)- and (Z)-isomers 1e14 in comparison with combretastatin
A-4 to delineate their structureeactivity relationships (SARs). Thus,
given that the cytotoxicity mechanism of combretastatin and
related structures has been shown to involve the inhibition of
tubulin polymerization by binding tubulin at the colchicine binding
site [25], we conducted molecular docking simulations of all stil-
bene analogs into this pocket [26]. The reported 3D structure of the
code 1SAO), but it has a resolution of only 3.58 Å and therefore
requires considerable computational effort before models derived
from it can be considered “all-atom” [27]. Thus, the stathmin-like
domain, the C and D subunits, and the DAMA-colchicine were
removed from the model, the missing atoms on chain A residues
Gln 35, Asp 47, Thr 51, Glu 55, Thr 56, Glu 77, Arg 221, Gln 285, Arg
308, Ile 335, Lys 336, Lys 338, Arg 339, Gln 342, and chain B residues
His 37, Asn 59, Lys 124, Ser 126, Arg 215, Lys 218, Leu 219, Arg 322,
Lys 326, Lys 338, Arg 369, Lys 372, Asp 437 were added and locally
optimized. Then, using the MolProbity Web server [28], the
hydrogen atoms were added and the orientations of the hydroxyl
hydrogens from the Ser, Thr, and Tyr, the sulfhydryl orientations of
Cys, and the methyls of Met amino acids were optimized; at the
same time the positions of hydrogens on histidine, asparagine, and
glutamine residues were assigned, ensuring suitable ionization
states. Finally, the GasteigereMarsili charges [29] were assigned
and the whole protein, with the combretastatin A-4 positioned in
the place of the DAMA-colchicine ligand and aligned with the A-
ring, and the tree methoxyl groups were optimized to an energy
gradient of 0.005 kcal-Å/mol with amber 96 force field [30].
2.3. Chemical procedure of hydroxylation
The compounds 6, 10, and 14 were synthesized as follow:
a solution of m-CPBA in CH
a stirred solution of the substrate in CH
room temperature. The reaction mixtures were then washed with
a NaHSO solution and subsequently with saturated aqueous
NaHCO . The organic layer was dried (Na SO ), filtered, and
2
Cl
2
(0.150 mmol/mL) was added to
2
2
Cl (0.105 mmol/mL) at
3
3
2
4
concentrated in vacuo; the residues were submitted to flash-chro-
matography on a 3 ꢁ 25 cm silica gel column, eluted with EtOAc in
n-hexane (from 0% to 30%).
0
(
Z)-2-Hydroxy-3,5,4 -trimethoxystilbene (6): EI-MS m/z 285
ꢀ
1
0
[
M-H] ; H NMR (CDCl
3
):
d
3.53 (s, 3H, 4 -OCH
); 5.35 (s, 1H, OH); 6.33 (d, 1H, J ¼ 2.0 Hz,
); 6.61
); 6.75 (d, 2H, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, H-3 and H-5 ); 7.23 (d,
3
); 3.77 (s, 3H, 5-
OCH ); 3.86 (s, 3H, 3-OCH
3
3
H-4); 6.38 (d, 1H, J ¼ 2.0 Hz, H-6); 6.57 (d, 1H, J ¼ 12.0 Hz, H-
a
0
0
(
2
1
5
d,1H, J ¼ 12 Hz, H-
b
0
0
13
H, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, H-2 and H-6 ). C NMR (CDCl
3
): d 158.7, 152.4, 147.0,
37.6, 130.4, 128.6, 127.4, 123.5, 122.9, 114.2, 100.5, 98.8, 56.2, 55.9,
5.5.
Z)-2-Hydroxy-3,5,3 ,5 -tetramethoxystilbene (10): EI-MS m/z
0
0
(
ꢀ
1
3
3
6
15 [M-H] ; H NMR (CDCl
); 3.86 (s, 3H, 3-OCH
.33 (s, 1H, H-6); 6.37 (s, 1H, H-4); 6.47 (s, 2H, H-2 and H-6 ); 6.60
3
):
d
3.52 (s, 3H, 5-OCH
3
); 3.65 (s, 6H,
0
0
0
,5 -OCH
3
3
); 5.38 (s,1H, OH); 6.31 (s,1H, H-4 );
0
0
13
(
(
1
d, 1H, J ¼ 12.5 Hz, H-
CDCl ): 159.8, 153.9, 146.9, 139.2, 137.2, 131.0, 123.9, 122.5, 104.2,
00.0, 99.1, 56.1, 55.7, 55.4.
a
); 6.71 (d, 1H, J ¼ 12.5 Hz, H-
b). C NMR
3
d
0 0
Z)-2-Hydroxy-3,5,3 ,4 -tetramethoxystilbene (14): EI-MS m/z
(
ꢀ
1
0
0
3
); 3.63 (s, 3H, 3 -
3
15 [M-H] ; H NMR (CDCl
3
):
d
3.35 (s, 3H, 4 OCH
OCH ); 3.85 (s, 6H, 3,5-OCH
3
3
); 5.36 (s, 1H, OH); 6.35 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 2.5 Hz, H-4); 6.38 (d, 1H, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, H-6); 6.59 (bs, 2H, H-
a
and
3. Results
0
H-b
); 6.74 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, H-3); 6.85 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.5, H-2 ) over-
0
13
lapped with 6.74 (d, 1H, J ¼ 2 Hz, H-6 ). C NMR (CDCl
50.1, 149.8, 148.2, 137.6, 130.6, 129.9, 123.7, 122.1, 121.1, 111.7, 110.7,
04.3, 98.9, 56.2, 55.7, 55.5, 55.4.
The spectral data of already published resveratrol analogs are in
agreement with those reported in the literature [24].
3
):
d
151.9,
We compared the potency of resveratrol synthetic analogs
toward the human colorectal tumor cell line SW480 by comparing
two reference natural molecules, i.e., (E)-3,5,4 -Trihydroxystilbene
(1) and (Z)-3,5,4 -Trihydroxystilbene (2) (Fig. 1); the (E)- and (Z)-
isomers of the 3,5,4 -Trimethoxystilbene (3 and 4, respectively),
1
1
0
0
0