388
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 85, No. 3, 19 July 2004
Aoki et al.
p-c isotherm measurement was carried out to 1ϫ10−3 MPa
of hydrogen pressure to dehydrogenate the sample, the dif-
fraction peaks of the CaSiH1.3 phase disappeared, and those
of the CaSi phase appeared with 131 and 200 reflections for
the orthorhombic lattice splitting as indicated in Fig. 3. The
lattice parameters estimated by the Rietveld analysis were
a=4.5336͑7͒ Å, b=10.839͑2͒ Å, and c=3.8913͑6͒ Å. These
changes in the lattice parameters are attributed to the hydro-
gen dissolved in the CaSi phase.
We will systematically investigate the detailed structure
of CaSi hydride by synchrotron radiation x-ray diffraction
and neutron diffraction measurements to understand the hy-
driding and dehydriding properties of CaSi, through an ex-
periment and theoretical discussion.
In conclusion, we found that CaSi reversibly absorbs and
desorbs hydrogen in a temperature range of 473–573 K.
CaSi has the same CrB-type structure as ZrNi and LaNi,
however, it shows different hydriding and dehydriding prop-
erties. Therefore, it is important to investigate the detailed
structure of CaSi for improving its performance as a practical
hydrogen storage material. CaSi is a new hydrogen storage
alloy, and its reversible hydriding and dehydriding properties
suggest great potential of metal silicides for hydrogen stor-
age. We are also investigating the hydriding and dehydriding
properties of other metal silicides.
FIG. 2. van’t Hoff plot of CaSi in the dehydriding process.
of hydride formation calculated using a van’t Hoff plot
(shown in Fig. 2) were −62 kJ/mol H2 and
−116 J/mol H2 K, respectively. This value of the enthalpy,
which is less negative than those of ZrNiH, ZrNiH3, and
LaNiH4,5–9 shows that CaSiH1.3 is unstable as compared with
these hydrides.
Figure 3 shows the XRD profiles of the sample as pre-
pared, after hydrogenation and after dehydrogenation at
473 K in all cases. The sample as prepared was composed of
the CaSi phase and a small quantity of CaO phase. The lat-
tice parameters of the CaSi phase determined by a Rietveld
analysis of the XRD profile were a=4.5589͑1͒ Å, b
=10.7250͑2͒ Å, and c=3.8930͑1͒ Å, which are in agreement
with the values reported in the previous work.17,18 After the
sample was hydrogenated at 9 MPa, the diffraction peaks of
the CaSiH1.3 phase appeared, while those of the CaSi phase
disappeared. The CaSiH1.3 phase was indexed on an ortho-
rhombic lattice with the parameters a=11.217͑1͒ Å, b
=14.615͑2͒ Å, and c=3.8165͑3͒ Å. The diffraction intensi-
ties suggested the space group to be Pbcn (No. 60). Rietveld
refinements based on a metal atom sublattice in the space
group Pbcn converged at Rwp=5.7% and RI=11.4%, where
Rwp and RI are the weighted profile reliability factor and the
reliability factor based on integrated intensities, respectively.
The structure of the CaSiH1.3 phase (space group Pbcn) is
different from those of ZrNiH12 and ZrNiH3.12,15 After the
The authors would like to thank K. Miwa for his valu-
able comments and suggestions regarding this study and Y.
Kondo for conducting the valuable hydrogen analysis.
1H. Zijlstra and F. F. Westendrop, Solid State Commun. 7, 857 (1969).
2J. J. Reilly and R. H. Wiswall, Inorg. Chem. 13, 218 (1974).
3E. Akiba and H. Iba, Intermetallics 6, 461 (1998).
4G. G. Libowitz, H. F. Hayes, and T. R. P. Gibb, Jr., J. Phys. Chem. 62, 76
(1958).
5W. Luo, A. Craft, T. Kuji, H. S. Chung, and T. B. Flanagan, J. Less-
Common Met. 162, 251 (1990).
6P. Dantzer, P. Millet, and T. B. Flanagan, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32A, 29
(2001).
7J. S. Cantrell, R. C. Bowman, Jr., L. A. Wade, S. Luo, J. D. Clewley, and
T. B. Flanagan, J. Alloys Compd. 231, 518 (1995).
8I. E. Nemirovskaya, A. M. Alekseev, and V. V. Lunin, J. Alloys Compd.
177, 1 (1991).
9K. Ensslen, E. Bucher, and H. Oesterreicher, J. Less-Common Met. 92,
343 (1983).
10G. Busch, L. Schlapbach, and T. H. von Waldkirch, J. Less-Common Met.
60, 83 (1978).
11V. A. Yartys’, V. V. Burnasheva, K. N. Semenenko, N. V. Fadeeva, and S.
P. Solov’ev, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 7, 957 (1982).
12D. G. Westlake, H. Shaked, P. R. Mason, B. R. McCart, M. H. Mueller, T.
Matsumoto, and M. Amano, J. Less-Common Met. 88, 17 (1982).
13W. L. Korst, J. Phys. Chem. 66, 370 (1962).
14M. E. Kost, L. N. Padurets, A. A. Chertkov, and V. I. Mikheeva, Russ. J.
Inorg. Chem. 25, 471 (1980).
15D. G. Westlake, J. Less-Common Met. 75, 177 (1980).
16S. W. Peterson, V. N. Sadana, and W. L. Korst, J. Phys. (Paris) 25, 451
(1964).
17P. Manfrinetti, M. L. Fornasini, and A. Palenzona, Intermetallics 8, 223
(2000).
18W. Rieger and E. Parthe, Acta Crystallogr. 22, 919 (1967).
19D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990); K. Laasonen, A. Pas-
quarello, R. Car, C. Lee, and D. Vanderbilt, ibid. 47, 10142 (1993).
20P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964); W. Kohn and
L. J. Sham, ibid. 140, A1133 (1965).
FIG. 3. X-ray diffraction profiles of CaSi (a) as-prepared, (b) after hydro-
genation under 9 MPa of hydrogen pressure, and (c) after dehydrogenation
as the p-c isotherm measurement was carried out to 1ϫ10−3 MPa of hydro-
gen pressure. Both hydrogenation and dehydrogenation were performed at
473 K.
21F. Izumi, in The Rietveld Method, edited by R. A. Young (Oxford Univer-
sity Press, Oxford, UK, 1993), Chap. 13.
On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 09:53:01