LETTER
Synthesis of TRIP
2191
Both the partial salt and the free acid of TRIP catalyzed of HCl and a base will give the free acid and the salt, re-
the reaction to give the chiral amine with the same enanti- spectively, which can now be used as references. These
omeric excess of 88% (Table 2, entries 1–3). But the free tests can be performed directly in the NMR tube as well.
acid was significantly more active: within 3 hours, essen-
In summary, we have been able to show that the chiral
tially full conversion was reached (Table 2, entry 3) while
phosphoric acid TRIP easily becomes contaminated with
with using the partial salt A, only 31% conversion was
metal impurities during the synthesis, leading to a product
containing phosphate salts. This significantly reduces the
content of free acid in the product which can appreciably
reached within the same time and it took 24 hours for full
conversion (Table 2, entries 1 and 2).
The main source of the metal impurities found in TRIP A hamper the catalytic activity. We found methods to easily
could not unambigously be determined. We presume that judge the quality of TRIP with respect to the salt content,
1
either chromatographic purification on silica gel or the using H NMR spectroscopy or simply pH paper. An im-
various metal-containing reagents during the synthesis are proved synthetic protocol for TRIP was established that
responsible. Nevertheless, we developed an improved reliably produces the free acid.
synthetic method for TRIP that would reliably yield the
free acid (Scheme 1, also see the Supporting Information).
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
http://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/toc/synlett.
i-Pr
MgBr
i)
4
Acknowledgment
Br
i-Pr
i-Pr
Generous support by the Max-Planck-Society, the Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft (Priority Program 1179 Organocatalysis),
and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully acknowled-
ged.
Ni(PPh3)2Cl2 (10 mol%)
Et2O, 6 h, reflux
OMe
OMe
ii) BBr3, CH2Cl2,
24 h, r.t.
45% (2 steps)
Br
3
References and Notes
i-Pr
i-Pr
(1) (a) Akiyama, T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5744. (b) Terada,
M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4097.
i-Pr
OH
OH
i-Pr
POCl3, pyridine,
4 h, reflux,
(
2) (a) Akiyama, T.; Itoh, J.; Yokota, K.; Fuchibe, K. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1566. (b) Uraguchi, D.; Terada, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5356.
1
2
H2O, 3 h, reflux,
CH2Cl2–HCl
9
(3) Adair, G.; Mukherjee, S.; List, B. Aldrichimica Acta 2008,
9%
41, 31.
i-Pr
5
(4) (a) Hoffmann, S.; Seayad, A. M.; List, B. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 7424. (b) Akiyama, T. WO 2004096753,
i-Pr
2
004; Chem. Abstr. 2004, 141, 411087.
5) Hoffmann, S.; Nicoletti, M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
006, 128, 13074.
Scheme 1
(
2
Starting from compound 3, the triisopropylphenyl groups
were introduced by a nickel-catalyzed Kumada coupling
with preformed Grignard reagent 4. Deprotection of the
(6) Zhou, J.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7498.
(7) (a) Seayad, J.; Seayad, A. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
006, 128, 1086. (b) Terada, M.; Sorimachi, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 292. (c) Jia, Y.-X.; Zhong, J.; Zhu,
phenolic hydroxyl groups with BBr gave the diol 5 in
3
S.-F.; Zhang, C.-M.; Zhou, Q.-L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
4
5% yield over two steps. Introduction of the phosphoric
2007, 46, 5565.
acid group was achieved by reaction with phosphoryl
chloride followed by hydrolysis, giving 2 in nearly quan-
titative yield. Key to receiving the free acid in pure form
was a thorough washing of TRIP with hydrochloric acid
after the final step. The product received in this way could
easily be crystallized from acetonitrile in contrast to
batches containing a mixed salt. Thus, we could obtain
single crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography (see the
(
8) (a) Akiyama, T.; Tamura, Y.; Itoh, J.; Morita, H.; Fuchibe,
K. Synlett 2006, 141. (b) Liu, W.-J.; Chen, X.-H.; Gong,
L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5357.
(9) Lacour, J.; Moraleda, D. Chem. Commun. 2009, 7073.
10) Mayer, S.; List, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4193.
11) Wang, X.; List, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1119.
12) (a) Martin, N. J. A.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
(
(
(
13368. (b) Wang, X.; Reisinger, C. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 6070.
2
0
Supporting Information).
(
13) Hamilton, G. L.; Kang, E. J.; Mba, M.; Toste, F. D. Science
2
007, 317, 496.
These findings should be useful for the synthesis of other
strong organic Brønsted acids, too. A quick analysis with
pH paper will give a first estimate whether the product is
mainly the desired acid or has transformed into a salt. A
more precise but still fast analysis can be performed by
NMR: treating a sample of the Brønsted acid with excess
(
(
14) Mukherjee, S.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11336.
15) (a) Komanduri, V.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 16448. (b) Li, C.; Wang, C.; Villa-Marcos, B.; Xiao, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14450. (c) Li, C.; Villa-
Marcos, B.; Xiao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6967.
(d) Klussmann, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7124.
(
e) Liu, X.-Y.; Che, C.-M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4204.
Synlett 2010, No. 14, 2189–2192 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York