The different resins were added to a stock solution of 7
containing 4 equiv of binding sites relative to the amount of
7. After 2 h of shaking, the resins were filtrated and the
concentration of 7 in the filtrate was determined using UV
measurements. The results are summarized in Table 1. The
Table 1. Initial Complexation Studiesa
Figure 1. Principle of recycling by hydrogen bonds.
(UPy) group. This self-complementary UPy tag displays a
remarkably high dimerization constant of >107 in chloro-
form.7 We envisioned that functionalization of a solid support
with a UPy tag, in combination with a complementary UPy-
tagged catalyst, should give rise to a distinct affinity, leading
to a reversible binding as described above.
Initially, an optimal AT-equipped resin system had to be
developed. Therefore, both a flexible Merrifield resin (2a,
2% cross-linked) and a highly cross-linked, rigid ArgoPore
resin (2b) were functionalized with different ATs and their
complexation efficiency was evaluated. These complexation
studies with the UV-active UPy-tagged compound 78 were
performed to determine which resin would be most suited
to bind tagged compounds from a solution.
a Conditions: 4 equiv of binding sites on the resin (relative to the amount
of 7) in 1,2-dichloropropane, 2 h, room temperature.
Merrifield resin. b: ArgoPore resin.
b a: 2% cross-linked
(2) See, for example: (a) Cornejo, A.; Fraile, J. M.; Garc´ıa, J. I.; Gil,
M. J.; Luis, S. V.; Mart´ınez-Merino, V.; Mayoral, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 70, 5536-5544. (b) Kobayashi, S.; Akiyama, R. Chem. Commun.
2003, 4, 449-460. (c) Nagayama, S.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2000, 39 567-569. (d) Annis, D. A.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 4147-4154.
high amounts of unbound substrate using Merrifield resins
3a and 4a (entries 3 and 5) led us to conclude that
homodimerization on the solid support was a significant
problem. Conceivably, the relatively flexible linker allowed
the resin-bound ATs to dimerize, making binding of substrate
molecules more difficult. This problem was partially solved
by using a rigid ArgoPore resin with a low degree of
functionalization (0.28 mmol of endgroups/g). In this case,
the substrate was bound somewhat more efficiently, with a
clear difference between the linker-bound UPy moiety (3b,
entry 4) and the UPy that was directly attached to the resin
(4b, entry 6). This observation confirmed the hypothesis of
homodimerization on the resin. Finally, the best results were
obtained using the same highly cross-linked ArgoPore resin
in combination with alkyl-functionalized UPy moieties
(5a,b). Because the side group on these UPy moieties did
not have a large influence on the complexation, i.e., resins
5b and 6b performed equally well in binding substrate 7
(entries 7 and 8), the commercially available isocytosine (R
) Me) was selected as the AT of choice for the catalyst
recycling process. The functionalization procedure involved
(3) For reviews, see: (a) de Wolf, E.; van Koten, G.; Deelman, B. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 1999, 28, 37-41. (b) Curran, D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998,
37, 1175-1196. For some recent examples, see, e.g.: (a) Matsugi, M.;
Curran, D. P. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1636-1642. (b) Dinh, L. V.; Gladysz,
J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4095-4097.
(4) For a review, see: Dijkstra, H. P.; van Klink, G. P. M.; van Koten,
G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 798-810. Recent examples: (a) Witte, P.
T.; Chowdhury, S. R.; ten Elshof, J. E.; Sloboda-Rozner, D.; Neumann,
R.; Alsters, P. L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 9, 1206-1208. (b) Aerts, S.;
Weyten, H.; Buekenhoudt, A.; Gevers, L. E. M.; Vankelecom, I. F. J.;
Jacobs, P. A. Chem. Commun. 2004, 6, 710-711. (c) De Smet, K.; Pleysier,
A.; Vankelecom, I. F. J.; Jacobs, P. A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 334-338.
(5) For covalent examples, see, e.g.: (a) Belser, T.; Sto¨hr, M.; Pfaltz,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8720-8731. (b) Dai, L.-X. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 41, 5726-5729. (c) Bra¨se, S.; Dahmen, S.; Lauterwasser,
F.; Leadbeater, N. E.; Sharp, E. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12,
1849-1851. (d) Pugin, B. J. Mol. Catal. A 1996, 107, 273-279. For a
noncovalent example, see: Chen, R.; Bronger, R. P. J.; Kamer, P. C. J.;
van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Reek, J. N. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
14557-14566.
(6) For a separation tag based on H-bonding, see: Zhang, K.; Fukase,
M.; Izumi, Y.; Fukase, S.; Kusumoto Synlett 2001, 590.
(7) (a) Folmer, B. J. B.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Versteegen, R. M.; van der
Rijt, J. A. J.; Meijer, E. W. AdV. Mater. 2000, 12, 874-878. (b) Beijer, F.
H.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 6761-6769.
(8) So¨ntjens, S. H. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Genderen, M. H. P.; Meijer,
E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7487-7493.
3164
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 15, 2006