Edge Article
Chemical Science
Synthetic Methods, ed. M. H. Todd, Wiley & Sons, New York,
2014, pp. 75–89.
Conflicts of interest
2 Dynamic thermodynamic resolution has been reported by
Beak et al., see: (a) P. Beak, D. R. Anderson, M. D. Curtis,
J. M. Laumer, D. J. Pippel and G. A. Weisenburger, Acc.
Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 715–727; (b) W. K. Lee, Y. S. Park and
P. Beak, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 224–234.
There are no conicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scien-
3 Some catalytic asymmetric reactions may proceed via the KR
pathway for cationic intermediates under equilibrium
conditions between the cations and the achiral reactants.
In most of those cases, it is considered that enantio-
enriched cationic intermediates are formed from the
achiral reactants under the inuence of chiral catalysts.
See: (a) S. E. Denmark, W. E. Kuester and M. T. Burk,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10938–10953; (b) K. Murai
and H. Fujioka, Heterocycles, 2013, 87, 763–805.
tic Research on Innovative Areas “Advanced Molecular
Transformations by Organocatalysts” (No. 23105002
&
26105704) and “Hybrid Catalysis for Enabling Molecular
Synthesis on Demand” (No. JP17H06447) from MEXT, Japan.
We also thank the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences
for the JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (Y. T.).
Notes and references
4 Jacobsen et al. reported the dynamic kinetic resolution of
seleniranium ions, see: H. Zhang, S. Lin and
E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 16485–16488.
5 For seminal studies, see: (a) T. Akiyama, J. Itoh, K. Yokota
and K. Fuchibe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1566–
1568; (b) D. Uraguchi and M. Terada, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 5356–5357.
6 For selected reviews of chiral Brønsted acid catalysis, see: (a)
H. Yamamoto and N. Payette, in Hydrogen Bonding in Organic
Synthesis, ed. P. M. Pihko, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009, pp.
73–140; (b) T. Akiyama, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5744–5758;
(c) M. Terada, Synthesis, 2010, 1929–1982; (d) D. Kampen,
C. M. Reisinger and B. List, Top. Curr. Chem., 2010, 291,
395–456; (e) D. Parmar, E. Sugiono, S. Raja and
M. Rueping, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 9047–9153.
7 For selected reviews of chiral anions in asymmetric catalysis,
see: (a) R. J. Phipps, G. L. Hamilton and F. D. Toste, Nat.
Chem., 2012, 4, 603–614; (b) M. Mahlau and B. List, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 518–533; (c) K. Brak and
E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 534–561.
8 For the enantio-convergent Nicholas reaction catalysed by
chiral phosphoric acids, see: (a) M. Terada, Y. Ota, F. Li,
Y. Toda and A. Kondoh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138,
11038–11043; (b) Y. Ota, A. Kondoh and M. Terada, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 13917–13921.
9 (a) T. Hayashi, in Ferrocenes, ed. A. Togni and T. Hayashi,
VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1995, pp. 105–142; (b) A. Togni,
in Metallocenes, ed. A. Togni and R. L. Halterman, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 685–721. See
also: (c) A. Togni, C. Breutel, A. Schnyder, F. Spindler,
H. Landert and A. Taijani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
4062–4066; (d) P. Vicennati and P. G. Cozzi, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2007, 2248–2253.
§ The acid-catalysed methanol addition to vinylferrocene (5) successfully regen-
erated methyl ether 1 in over 90% yield. See ESI† for details.
{ All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 package.16 Geometrical
optimization of transition states TSs and TSr was conducted at the B3LYP/6-31G*
level17 and characterized using frequency calculations, and the free energies were
computed for the gas phase. Single-point energy calculations for the optimized
transition states (at the B3LYP/6-31G* level) were also evaluated at the M06-2X/6-
311+G** level18 in the solution phase according to the SCRF method based on
CPCM (3 ¼ 2.3741 for toluene).19 The free energies in toluene were calculated from
the sum of the single-point energies in toluene and the value of thermal correction
to Gibbs free energy in the gas phase.
k All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 package.16 The transition
states of the deprotonation step of enantiomeric cations A by chiral conjugate
base (R)-2ꢀ were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G* level17 in the gas phase and
characterized using frequency calculations. Single-point energy calculations for
the optimized transition states were conducted at the M06-2X/6-311+G** level18 in
the solution phase according to the SCRF method based on CPCM (3 ¼ 2.3741 for
toluene).19 The free energies in toluene were calculated from the sum of the single-
point energies in toluene and the value of thermal correction to Gibbs free energy
in the gas phase.
** The reaction in toluene under the same reaction conditions (at room
temperature for 24 h) afforded (S)-4g in 24% yield with 94% ee.
†† In order to enhance the utility of the developed DPKR, we attempted the
reaction of ferrocenyl derivative methyl ether having ethyl substituent, instead of
methyl substituent of 1. Initially, the optimized reaction conditions were applied
to this derivative. However, demethoxylation product, namely, 1-propenylferro-
cene, was formed as the sole product and no desired substitution product was
obtained at all, despite the complete consumption of the starting methyl ether.
Similarly, the use of more nucleophilic TsNH2 (3a) rather than NsNH2 (3g) was
also unsuccessful, affording 1-propenylferrocene quantitatively. These results
indicate that protonation to 1-propenylferrocene became markedly sluggish using
parent CPA (R)-2. Therefore CPAs having strong acidity, such as a triylamide
derivative and a bisphosphoric acid, were further investigated. As expected, these
strong acids gave rise to the corresponding substitution product in moderate
yield, albeit low enantioselectivity. The present intriguing DPKR is established by
the well-balanced system between the deprotonation of cation A and the selective
introduction of a nucleophile to enantiomeric cations A. Hence, to achieve the
efficient DPKR with high enantioselectivity, optimization of CPAs and reaction
conditions would be strictly required for each substrate. See ESI† for details.
10 (a) A. A. Koridze, P. V. Petrovskii, S. P. Gubin, V. I. Sokolov
and A. I. Mokhov, J. Organomet. Chem., 1977, 136, 65–71;
(b) C. Bleiholder, F. Rominger and R. Gleiter,
Organometallics, 2009, 28, 1014–1017.
1 (a) H. B. Kagan and J. C. Fiaud, in Topics in Stereochemistry,
ed. E. L. Eliel, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988, vol. 18, pp.
249–330; (b) A. H. Hoveyda and M. T. Didiuk, Curr. Org.
Chem., 1998, 2, 489–526; (c) J. M. Kieth, J. F. Larrow and 11 For the enantioselective substitution reaction with nitrogen
E. N. Jacobsen, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2001, 1, 5–26; (d)
E. Vedejs and M. Jure, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44,
3974–4001; (e) H. Pellissier, in Separation of Enantiomers:
nucleophile using chiral phosphoric acids, see: (a)
M. Rueping, U. Uria, M.-Y. Lin and I. Atodiresei, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3732–3735; (b) P.-S. Wang,
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry
Chem. Sci., 2021, 12, 10306–10312 | 10311