sociation, and orientation of azinomycin B on its duplex
DNA receptor.7 We now provide further mechanistic clari-
fication on the critical role that the naphthoate and N16
carboxamide play in sequence selective DNA alkylation in
a series of partial structures, and we demonstrate a strong
correlation between the extent of covalent modification of
DNA and in vitro cytotoxicity. We find that the naphthoate
and the carboxamide increase alkylation yields and sequence
selectivity and that both are important for effective cytotoxic
activity.
Figure 3. DNA sequences.
Armstrong and co-workers reported that azinomycin B
cross-links duplex DNA in the major groove at the N7-
positions of 5′-disposed purine bases in the sequence
5′-PuNPy-3′.3c Saito and co-workers confirmed this result
and provided evidence of the orientation of the agent on the
DNA duplex.3b Modeling studies by Alcaro and Coleman8
and experimental work by Coleman and co-workers7 pro-
vided evidence that aziridine C10 alkylates the 5′ guanine
in a GGC strand in the initial monoalkylation, and cross-
linking ensues by epoxide C21 alkylation of the guanine in
the CCG strand. Computational work was consistent with
either an intercalative or non-intercalative binding mode for
the naphthoate, and experimental work by Zang and Gates
indicated that naphthoate-bearing fragments were weak
intercalating agents.3a Our studies on azinomycin B point to
a non-intercalative binding mode.7 Shipman and co-workers
provided the first evidence that the epoxide was important
for cytotoxic activity.2a We now demonstrate a strong
correlation between the alkylating ability of a series of
epoxide-bearing partial structures (Figure 2) and in vitro
cytotoxicity.
stranded and double-stranded forms of these oligodeoxy-
nucleotides.
Alkylation of GGC-strand 7 in duplex 7‚8 by azinomycin
partial structure 3 was highly effective (86%, Table 1) and
Table 1. Yield of Covalent Adduct Formationa between
Epoxyamide 3 and DNA Oligomers 7-10b
GGC (7)
CCG (8)
CGG (9)
GCC (10)
ds
ss
86%
23%
36%
17%
42%
28%
52%
12%
a Yields are the average of three measurements. Yields reported for
double-stranded oligomers represent the results obtained when that oligomer
was 32P end labeled. b Reactions were run at 8 °C for 20 h using 100 equiv
of 3 per oligodeoxynucleotides duplex.
occurred with 4:1 selectivity for the more nucleophilic 5′
guanine.9 The yield was lower with the CCG strand 8 (36%),
in accord with consideration of base nucleophilicity. (Com-
bined yields for duplex 7‚8 are greater than 100% because
of double alkylation.) With duplex 9‚10 containing an
inverted azinomycin recognition triplet where the guanine
bases are 3′-disposed, the CGG strand 9 underwent modestly
effective alkylation with 3 (42%), again with 4:1 selectivity
for the more nucleophilic 5′ guanine. The complementary
GCC strand 10 was alkylated to a similar extent by 3 (52%).
These results indicate that the partial structure 3 must interact
with duplex DNA by multiple binding modes and with
altered sequence selectivity from the natural product. In
duplexes 7‚8 and 9‚10, all guanine bases are alkylated to a
significant but differential extent by 3; azinomycin B reacts
selectively at the two distal 5′-disposed guanines in this triplet
by an apparently well-defined binding mode.7 In the duplex
7‚8, the extent of alkylation by the epoxide of 3 correlated
well with guanine nucleophilicity, but with the inverted
duplex 9‚10, the less reactive guanine in the GCC strand 10
underwent more efficient alkylation.
Figure 2. Azinomycin partial structures.
Using synthetic DNA oligomers containing the azinomycin
recognition sequence GGC‚CCG,7 and the inverted sequence
CGG‚GCC, wherein both triplets were embedded within an
unreactive A‚T tract (Figure 3), we examined the ability of
compounds 2-6 to alkylate guanine bases in both single-
Alkylation yields dropped significantly in single-stranded
oligomers, being slightly higher for 7 than 8, and similarly
for 9 compared to 10. With the GGC strand 7 and CGG
strand 9, there was no sequence selectivity for alkylation of
the two guanines (1:1) when these oligomers were single-
stranded. There was no sequence recognition of single-
stranded DNA by 3, although it is instructive to compare
the alkylation yields for single- versus double-stranded
(6) For a review of the azinomycins, see: Hodgkinson, T. J.; Shipman,
M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4467. For a review on the synthesis of DNA
cross-linking agents, see: Coleman, R. S. Curr. Opin. Drug DiscoVery DeV.
2001, 4, 435. For a review on DNA cross-linking agents, see: Rajski, S.
R.; Williams, R. M. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2723. For a review of agents
that covalently modify DNA, see: Gates K. S. Covalent Modification of
DNA by Natural Products. In ComprehensiVe Natural Products Chemistry;
Barton, D., Nakanishi, K., Meth-Cohn, O., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Elsevier
Science, Oxford, U.K., 1999; p 491.
(7) Coleman, R. S.; Perez, R. J.; Burk, C. H.; Navarro, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, in press.
(8) Alcaro, S.; Coleman, R. S. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2783. Alcaro,
S.; Ortuso, F.; Coleman, R. S. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 861.
(9) Sugiyama, H.; Saito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7063.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 20, 2002
3546