558
D. Pollard et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17 (2006) 554–559
enzymatic reduction using in situ cofactor regeneration
was shown to be an efficient and practical alternative
to existing methods achieving superior selectivity of
>99.9%. The reduction using high substrate concentra-
tion, up to 580 mM, was demonstrated without the need
for additional organic co-solvent. The substrate to cata-
lyst molar ratio for substrate 1 was high at 1,000,000:1
and total turnover numbers for NAD estimated to be
>1000. The ability to use the improved glucose dehydro-
genase 103 for cofactor recycling of either NADH or
NADPH allows the same reaction method to be used
to synthesize either enantiomers of alcohol 2 by simply
switching between the ketoreductase enzyme such as
ADH RE or KRED 101. This biocatalytic method pro-
vides general applicability of chiral alcohol production
for robust manufacturing with effective space time yields
using standard chemical processing equipment.
relative activity % compared to a standard ADH RE
solution 2 U/mL (for 40-chloroacetophenone). The activ-
ity of the NAD dependent FDH and GDH 103 was
determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the
reduction of NAD at 340 nm (E340 = 6.22 mMꢀ1 cmꢀ1
)
in the presence of 150 mM sodium formate for FDH or
150 mM glucose for GDH. Activity of the reaction sam-
ples was expressed as relative activity % compared to a
standard FDH solution or GDH solution 2 U/mol (for
sodium formate and glucose, respectively). Studies of
ADH RE, FDH, and GDH stability were carried out at
a range of pH and temperature conditions at 1 mL scale.
Samples (10 lL) were removed during a 48 h period and
activity measured as described above. The main activity
loss was described by the first order deactivation where
the half life (t1/2) for each pH and temperature condition
with both enzymes was measured from the Ln plot of rel-
ative activity against time.
4. Experimental
4.3. Enzymatic reduction of ketone 1 using formate
dehydrogenase for cofactor regeneration
All solvents and reagents including enzymes were pur-
chased commercially. The ADH RE, formate dehydro-
genase 101 and glucose dehydrogenase 103 were from
Biocatalytics Inc. Enzyme activity was measured spec-
trophotometrically using a Biotek powerwave HT plate
reader. Quantification of ketone to alcohol conversion
was completed using reverse phase HPLC with a Zorbax
extend C18 column. The mobile phase was 40% aceto-
nitrile/60% water with 0.1% TFA. The isocratic flow
rate was 0.75 mL/min at 25 °C with absorbance moni-
toring at 265 nm. Chiral analysis for ee determination
was by normal phase HPLC with Chiralcel OD-H
column using 98% hexanes/2% 2-propanol at 1 mL/
min, 25 °C and monitoring at 265 nm.
Development work was completed at the 4 g scale:
phosphate monobasic buffer (50 mM, pH 7.2) was
added to a Multimax reactor (Mettler Toledo) at a vol-
ume of 40 mL with overhead agitation. NAD (1 g/L) at
160 mg was added followed with sodium formate 6 g
and the two enzymes ADH RE (3 KU/L) and FDH
(2.88 KU/L). The specific activity for ADH RE was
35 U/mg and FDH activity was 4.7 U/mg, calculated
using the activity assays outlined in Section 4.2. Reac-
tions were run at 30 °C with automatic pH control at
7.0 using 2 N sulfuric acid. Ketone 1 was added as a
liquid. The same procedure was used for the 1.1 kg
process using a 20 L glass stirred tank reactor. The
reactions were extracted with two half volumes of hot
heptane when the substrate was shown to be >95% con-
verted. The combined heptane extracts were washed
with a 1/4 volume of water to remove remaining en-
zyme protein residues, then concentrated by distillation
to a 200 g/L concentration. For crystallization the solu-
tion was slowly cooled from 45 to 35 °C. Seeding with
alcohol product with 1 g (0.1% gram/gram of product)
was completed at 35 °C, followed by 1 h of aging and
cooled down to ꢀ10 °C. The crystallization procedure
rejected impurities such as residual ketone and final
purity of >99% was obtained. 1H NMR: d 7.85 (s,
2H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 5.05 (qd, J = 6.5, 3.3, 1H), 2.04
(d, J = 3.3, 1H), 1.56 (d, J = 6.5, 3H). 13C NMR: d
148.44, 131.99 (q, J = 33.2), 125.87 (br q, J = 2.8),
123.58 (q, J = 272.6), 121.53 (septet, J = 3.9), 69.31,
25.79.
4.1. Screening protocol
A total of 40 commercially available ketoreductases
(KRED 101–131) from Biocatalytics Inc. and alcohol
dehydrogenases from Julich Fine Chemicals were used
at 2 g/L in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing
1.2 M equiv of NADPH or NADH for the dependency
of the enzyme. Substrate (20 mM) was delivered to the
reaction in 5% v/v toluene. After overnight incubation
at 30 °C, reactions were extracted with three volumes
of acetonitrile for reverse phase HPLC, then dried and
resuspended in methanol for chiral HPLC analysis.
4.2. Enzyme activity and stability
The activity of the NADH dependent ADH RE was
determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the
oxidation of NADH at 340 nm (E340 = 6.22 mMꢀ1 cmꢀ1
)
The same procedure was followed for the 25 kg pilot
plant batch at the 250 L scale with the inclusion of a
recycle loop in order to monitor pH.
in the presence of 2.5 mM 4-chloroacetophenone. Activ-
ity was measured at 25 °C in 96 well plate format (200 lL)
containing 200 mM potassium phosphate buffer at
pH 7.0 with 5 mM NADH. The reaction was started by
adding the assay mixture to the enzyme sample. The
reaction kinetics were monitored over a 2 min period
and one unit of ADH activity was defined as the amount
of enzyme that converted 1 lmol of NADH per minute.
The activity of the reaction samples was expressed as
4.4. Enzymatic reduction of ketone 1 using glucose
dehydrogenase 103 for cofactor regeneration
Development work was completed at the 8 g scale fol-
lowing the same protocol as Section 4.3, except that
GDH 103 replaced FDH at 5 KU/L. The specific activ-