of Sc3+ does not decay completely at 180 ms after the laser
excitation (gray line in Fig. 3(c)). The residual absorption
corresponds to that due to the CS state, decaying at prolonged
reaction time as shown in Fig. 3(d). The first-order decay rate
constant of the fast component in the presence of Sc3+ agrees with
the value in the absence of Sc3+ (3.2 6 104 s21) as shown in the
first-order plots (the inset of Fig. 3(c)). This indicates that no ET
Notes and references
1 L. Echegoyen, F. Diederich and L. E. Echegoyen, Fullerenes, Chemistry,
Physics, and Technology, ed. K. M. Kadish and R. S. Ruoff, Wiley-
Interscience, New York, 2000, pp. 1–51.
2 (a) K. Ohkubo, J. Shao, Z. Ou, K. M. Kadish, G. Li, R. K. Pandey,
M. Fujitsuka, O. Ito, H. Imahori and S. Fukuzumi, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2004, 43, 853; (b) S. Fukuzumi, K. Ohkubo, H. Imahori, J. Shao,
Z. Ou, G. Zheng, Y. Chen, R. K. Pandey, M. Fujitsuka, O. Ito and
K. M. Kadish, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 10676.
3 H. Imahori, D. M. Guldi, K. Tamaki, Y. Yoshida, C. Luo, Y. Sakata
and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 6617.
4 (a) D. Gust, T. A. Moore and A. L. Moore, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34,
40; (b) G. Kodis, Y. Terazono, P. A. Liddell, J. Andreasson, V. Garg,
M. Hambourger, T. A. Moore, A. L. Moore and D. Gust, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 1818.
5 S. Fukuzumi and D. M. Guldi, Electron Transfer in Chemistry, ed.
V. Balzani, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 270–337.
6 Q. Xie, F. Arias and L. Echegoyen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 9818.
7 (a) C. A. Reed and R. D. Bolskar, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1075; (b)
C. A. Reed, K.-C. Kim, R. D. Bolskar and L. J. Mueller, Science, 2000,
289, 101.
8 For intermolecular photoinduced ET oxidation of C60, see: (a) G. Lem,
D. I. Schuster, S. H. Courtney, Q. Lu and S. R. Wilson, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1995, 117, 554; (b) I. G. Safonov, S. H. Courtney and D. I. Schuster,
Res. Chem. Intermed., 1997, 23, 541; (c) C. Siedschlag, H. Luftmann,
C. Wolff and J. Mattay, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 7805.
9 S. Fukuzumi, H. Mori, H. Imahori, T. Suenobu, Y. Araki, O. Ito and
K. M. Kadish, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 12458.
10 S. Fukuzumi and S. Itoh, Adv. Photochem., 1998, 25, 107.
11 S. Fukuzumi, Electron Transfer in Chemistry, ed. V. Balzani, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 4, pp. 3–67.
3
from C60* to the TNF moiety occurs in both the absence and
3
presence of Sc3+. In the absence of Sc3+, ET from C60* to the
TNF is highly endergonic and thereby energetically impossible as
3
mentioned above (Scheme 1). The ET from C60* to TNF in the
presence of Sc3+ becomes exergonic (20.08 eV in Scheme 1), but
the ET rate, which requires intermolecular ET activation by Sc3+
,
may be much slower than the decay of 3C60* because of the small
ET driving force.
On the other hand, ET from 1C60* to TNF is still energetically
impossible, but the ET becomes highly exergonic (20.27 eV) by
the addition of 30 mmol dm23 Sc(OTf)3. Femtosecond laser
excitation (l = 430 nm) of C60–TNF in deaerated PhCN results in
formation of the 1C60* at 3 ps after laser excitation. The transient
absorption of 1C60* is completely changed to 3C60* at 3000 ps (see
3
ESI,{ S3). The formation rate constant of C60* at 700 nm is
determined to be 9.0 6 108 s21. The addition of Sc(OTf)3
(30 mmol dm23) to a PhCN solution of C60–TNF also results in
formation of C60 + overlapped with the shoulder of absorption of
?
3C60*, since the absorption change at 700 nm in the presence of
Sc3+ is larger than that in the absence of Sc3+ (see ESI,{ S2). The
formation rate in the presence of Sc3+ is also determined as 9.0 6
108 s21, which is same as in the absence of Sc3+. Thus, the CS state
12 (a) K. Okamoto, Y. Araki, O. Ito and S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 56; (b) K. Okamoto, Y. Mori, H. Yamada, H. Imahori and
S. Fukuzumi, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 474.
13 S. Fukuzumi, K. Ohkubo, J. Ortiz, A. M. Gutie´rrez, F. Ferna´ndez-
´
La´zaro and A. Sastre-Santos, Chem. Commun., 2005, 3814.
+
1
(C60 –TNF 2/Sc3+) may be formed via ET from C60* to TNF
?
?
´
14 J. Ortiz, F. Ferna´ndez-La´zaro, A. Sastre-Santos, J. A. Quintana,
and the subsequent strong binding of TNF with Sc3+, which
2
?
J. M. Villalvilla, P. Boj, M. D´ıaz-Garc´ıa, J. A. Rivera, S. E. Stepleton,
C. T. Cox, Jr. and L. Echegoyen, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 5021.
15 PhCN was carefully distilled over P2O5 to remove the impurity.
16 The interaction between the neutral TNF and Sc(OTf)3 (30 mmol dm23
makes the CS process possible (Scheme 1).
The slow decay component (Fig. 3(d)) results from the charge-
recombination process. The lifetime of CS state is determined as
23 ¡ 4 ms in PhCN at 298 K from the first-order plot in the inset
of Fig. 3(d). The CS lifetime remains the same irrespective of
difference in concentrations of Sc3+ (1–30 mmol dm23).25
The activation enthalpy for the intramolecular back ET (BET)
was determined from the slope of the Eyring plot as 24 kJ mol21
(see ESI,{ S3). Such a large temperature dependence of the BET
rate indicates that the intramolecular BET process with the driving
force of 1.48 eV is deeply in the Marcus inverted region, since the
reorganization energy of BET is determined as 0.67 eV from the
activation enthalpy using the Marcus theory.26 No intermolecular
BET of the CS state was observed because the intermolecular BET
process is also slowed down in the Marcus inverted region as
reported previously for the intermolecular ET oxidation of C60.27
In summary, C60 has successfully been used as an electron donor
that is linked with an electron acceptor in the presence of Sc3+ to
attain the longest CS lifetime at 298 K (23 ¡ 4 ms) ever reported
for electron donor–acceptor linked systems.
)
is negligible, which is confirmed by UV-vis titration. See: S. Fukuzumi,
N. Satoh, T. Okamoto, K. Yasui, T. Suenobu, Y. Seko, M. Fujitsuka
and O. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 123, 7756.
17 The maximum solubility of Sc(OTf)3 to PhCN is 30 mmol dm23
.
18 C. S. Foote, Top. Curr. Chem., 1994, 169, 347.
19 S. Fukuzumi, T. Suenobu, M. Patz, T. Hirasaka, S. Itoh, M. Fujitsuka
and O. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8060.
20 The quantum yield of the CS state was determined using the
comparative method. In particular, the triplet–triplet absorption of
C60 (e740 = 18 800 mol21 dm3 cm21; Wtriplet = 0.98) served as a probe
to obtain the quantum yield for the CS state, especially for C60 (e =
11 000 mol21 dm3 cm21)9.
21 R. D. Webster and G. A. Heath, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3,
2588.
22 (a) F. D. Lewis, A. M. Bedell, R. E. Dykstra, J. E. Elbert, I. R. Gould
and S. Farid, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 8055; (b) M. Hara,
S. Samori, C. Xichen, M. Fujitsuka and T. Majima, J. Org. Chem.,
2005, 70, 4370; (c) T. Shida, Electronic Absorption Spectra of Radical
Ions, Elsevier, New York, 1988.
23 The one-electron oxidation potential was determined by second-
harmonic ac voltammetry in deaerated PhCN containing 0.1 mol dm23
Bu4NClO4.
+
?
24 S. Fukuzumi, J. Yuasa, N. Satoh and T. Suenobu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 7585.
25 Stable fullerene radical cation has been reported by means of a decrease
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid (Nos.
16205020, 17750039) from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology, Japan and by Grants BQU2002-
04513-C02-01 and MAT2005-07369-C03-02 from the Spanish
Government CICYT. Prof. Osamu Ito (Tohoku University,
Japan) is gratefully acknowledged for fruitful discussions of the
results.
+
of the interaction between C60 and counter anion.7 There is little
?
+
interaction between C60 and TNF 2 in the CS state. This may be the
?
?
reason why C60 + is long-lived in the present case.
?
26 R. A. Marcus and N. Sutin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1985, 811, 265.
27 S. Fukuzumi, K. Ohkubo, H. Imahori and D. M. Guldi, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2003, 9, 1585.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 589–591 | 591